Forty years ago, hardly anybody thought about going to court to sue somebody. A person could bump a pedestrian with his Chrysler Airflow and the victim would say something like, "No harm done," and walk away. Ipso facto. No filing of codicils, taking of depositions or polling the jury. Attorneys need not apply. Which one of the following sentences most logically continues the above passage?
Answer(s): C
The passage consistently implies a difference between the past and the present, and option [Unfortunately, times have changed.] makes this contrast explicit. Option [Fortunately, this is still the case...] contradicts the implication of the passage, while options [The Chrysler Airflow is no longer the...] and [New legislation affecting the necessity...] narrow the focus unnecessarily, and [But now, as we know, law schools are full of...] is irrelevant.
Forty years ago, hardly anybody thought about going to court to sue somebody. A person could bump a pedestrian with his Chrysler Airflow and the victim would say something like, "No harm done," and walk away. Ipso facto. No filing of codicils, taking of depositions or polling the jury. Attorneys need not apply.Which one of the following details, if true, would most strengthen the above statement?
Answer(s): D
This fact would strengthen the merely impressionistic evidence that lawsuits were less prevalent 40 years ago.It is the only choice dealing directly with the implied subject of the passage - lawsuits.
Tom is test driving a blue car. After driving for a short while he comes to the following conclusion: Since this car is blue, it must not accelerate quickly.The foregoing conclusion can be properly drawn if it is also known that
The given statement tells us only that the car is blue. For us to be assured that it is slow we must know either that every blue car is slow or that no blue car accelerates quickly. Option [all cars that accelerate quickly are red] restricts quick acceleration to red cars.
In 1975, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the federal government has exclusive rights to any oil and gas resources on the Atlantic Outer Shelf beyond the three-mile limit. Which one of the following must be true in order for this ruling to be logical?
Answer(s): B
A ruling on resources must at least presume the possibility that such resources exist; otherwise it is absurd. All other choices are irrelevant to the ruling.
By passing more and more regulations allegedly to protect the environment, the state is driving the manufacturing industry away. And when the employers leave, the workers will follow. The number of new no growth or environmental rules passed each year is increasing by leaps and bounds. Rich environmentalists who think they are sympathetic to workers have no real sympathy for the blue-collar employees are injured by their activities.One major manufacturer has been fined for failing to establish a car-pool plan. Another is accused of polluting the air with industrial emissions, although everyone knows that two thirds of the pollutants come from cars and trucks. No wonder the large manufacturers are moving to states with fewer restrictive laws. And as the manufacturers go, unemployment and the number of workers leaving the state will rise more rapidly than ever before.The author's argument that strict environmental laws will eventually lead to loss of workers in the state will be most weakened if it can be shown that
The passage argues that environmental restrictions will lead to losses of jobs and hence workers, but if workers are already leaving because the environmental quality is poor, the argument is seriously weakened.
By passing more and more regulations allegedly to protect the environment, the state is driving the manufacturing industry away. And when the employers leave, the workers will follow. The number of new no growth or environmental rules passed each year is increasing by leaps and bounds. Rich environmentalists who think they are sympathetic to workers have no real sympathy for the blue-collar employees are injured by their activities.One major manufacturer has been fined for failing to establish a car-pool plan. Another is accused of polluting the air with industrial emissions, although everyone knows that two thirds of the pollutants come from cars and trucks. No wonder the large manufacturers are moving to states with fewer restrictive laws. And as the manufacturers go, unemployment and the number of workers leaving the state will rise more rapidly than ever before. Which one of the following is NOT an argument of this passage?
The passage makes no comment on workers leaving before a manufacturer. It argues that the loss of manufacturers leads to a loss of workers [A rise in unemployment will lead to an increase...].
Unlike most graduates of American high schools, all graduates of high schools in Bermuda have completed four years of advanced mathematics.Which one of the following, if true, would best explain the situation described above?
Answer(s): E
Though choices [Math anxiety is higher in...], [There are far more high schools and...], [More students in America take fulltime...] and [Math programs in American high schools are...] might contribute to increased study of math in Bermuda, option [High Schools in Bermuda require four years of...] leaves no doubt. High schools in Bermuda require four years of advanced math for graduation; high schools in the United States do not.
By refusing to ban smoking in restaurants, the city council has put the financial wellbeing of restaurant owners above the health of the citizens of this city. No doubt, the council would support the restaurants if they decided to use asbestos tablecloths and to barbecue using radioactivity. These devices would be no more risky.The author of this paragraph makes her case by arguing
The passage makes its point by analogy, comparing the dangers of smoking to the dangers of asbestos and radioactivity.
Share your comments for Test Prep LSAT Test exam with other users:
please upload cima e2 managing performance dumps
wonderful questions
i used this site since 2000, still great to support my career
why is the answer to "which of the following is required by scrum?" all of the following stated below since most of them are not mandatory? sprint retrospective. members must be stand up at the daily scrum. sprint burndown chart. release planning.
great job. hope this helps out.
upload please. many thanks!
this is so interesting
great material thanks
anyone who wrote this exam recently
ok they re good
relevant questions
please post
q:42 there has to be a image in the question to choose what does it mean from the options
looking for cphq dumps, where can i find these for free? please and thank you.
@aarun , thanks for the information. it would be great help if you share your email
1z0-1078-23 need this dumps
i gave the microsoft azure az-500 tests and prepared from this site as it has latest mock tests available which helped me evaluate my performance and score 919/1000
i cannot see the button to go to the questions
good questions
q-6 ans-b correct. https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/9-1/pan-os-cli-quick-start/use-the-cli/commit-configuration-changes
very nice very nice
please help us with 1z0-1107-2 dumps
please upload the practice questions
need this dumps
preparing for this exam is overwhelming. you cannot pass without the help of these exam dumps.
new to this site but i feel it is good
the correct answer to q8 is b. explanation since the mule app has a dependency, it is necessary to include project modules and dependencies to make sure the app will run successfully on the runtime on any other machine. source code of the component that the mule app is dependent of does not need to be included in the exported jar file, because the source code is not being used while executing an app. compiled code is being used instead.
Delayed the exam until December 29th.
A and D are True
good one with explanation
This is one of the most useful study guides I have ever used.