You have access to the CLI of an HPE Aruba Networking CX switch. How can you output the switch make, model, and serial number displayed on the session?
Answer(s): D
Why option D is correct show system is the standard Aruba CX CLI command that outputs system-wide information, including the platform (make/model) and the serial number of the device. The output format shows fields such as System Name , Platform , and Serial Number , which directly match the requirement to display the switch make, model, and serial.Why the other options are less suitableA: show support-information – Generates a support bundle for troubleshooting; it includes chassis details but also adds many unrelated diagnostics and is intended for support staff, not for a simple make/model/serial query. B: diag dump basic – Executes basic diagnostic tests (e.g., power-supply, temperature) and returns test results, not system identification data. C: show configuration – Displays the current running configuration (interfaces, VLANs, etc.); it does not contain device identification fields.Conclusion – Only show system reliably and directly returns the required make, model, and serial number in a concise, standardized format, making it the optimal choice.
ArubaOS-CX CLI Command Reference – System Commands: show system –< https://docs.arubanetworks.com/arubaos-cx/10.9.0/ analgesys/arubaos-cx-switches/CLI/CLI_Command_Reference/System_Commands.html> Aruba Support Knowledge Base – Using show system to obtain device information –https://support.arubanetworks.com/s/article/3600465779505
Which firewall port needs to be opened between your Network Monitoring System and CX switches to collect monitoring data using SNMP?
Answer(s): A
Justification: The HP Comware-based CX switches use SNMP for monitoring; the default SNMP agent listens on UDP port 161 for incoming get-requests and traps. Network monitoring systems (e.g., HP OpenView, SolarWinds) send SNMP requests to port 161 and often receive responses from the switch on port 161 as well. Port 1157 is an outdated, deprecated SNMP port used historically by some early implementations and is not supported in modern HP/CX firmware. TCP ports 162 and 1156 are not used for SNMP; they are unrelated to the SNMP protocol stack and would not allow the monitoring system to retrieve data from the CX switches.
HP Comware 5 SNMP Configuration Guide – UDP port 161 used for SNMP traffic. HP Comware 5 Command Reference – Documentation of SNMP service configuration and default ports.
Which protocols can be used to control administrative access to HPE Aruba Networking OS-CX switches? (Choose two.)
Answer(s): A,E
Technical justification (exam-ready)RADIUS (A) – Widely supported on Aruba OS-CX for authenticating and authorizing privileged CLI/SSH/Telnet access. It integrates with external AAA servers (e.g., Microsoft NPS, FreeRADIUS) and can enforce per-user privilege levels, making it suitable for administrative access control.TACACS+ (E) – Also fully supported on OS-CX for management-plane authentication. Unlike RADIUS it encrypts the entire command stream, offers separate authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA) services, and is preferred when detailed command-level control or legacy TACACS+ servers are required.LDAP (B) – Not a native authentication method for OS-CX management access. LDAP can be used indirectly when a RADIUS/TACACS+ server queries an LDAP directory, but the switch does not accept LDAP directly for admin logins.Diameter (C) – While Diameter is employed internally by some RADIUS implementations, OS-CX does not expose Diameter as a standalone protocol for configuring CLI or SSH admin sessions. Access must be performed via RADIUS or TACACS+.SAML (D) – May be used for single-sign-on to the web GUI on certain Aruba platforms, but it is not provided as an option for authenticating to the switch’s command-line or management interfaces.Therefore, the only protocols that can be directly configured to control administrative access to HPE Aruba Networking switches running OS-CX are RADIUS and TACACS+ .
HPE Aruba Documentation – Aruba CX Operating System User Guide (Section “AAA Authentication”): https://docs.hpe.com/en-us/aruba cx/aruba-cx-osi/ HPE Aruba Documentation – Aruba CX Configuration Guide – Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting: https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docLocaleId=1&docId=1000333959/(These links are part of the official HPE Aruba Knowledge Base and are used for verification of the configurations.)
A customer requires a network upgrade to replace their existing core switches. The new solution must support 100G speeds to the aggregation layer, with the ability to scale to a 12U chassis. Which HPE Aruba Networking CX switch model would you initially propose?
Answer(s): B
Technical JustificationCX 10000 is a modular chassis designed for high-performance, scalable aggregation and can comfortably accommodate 100 GbE uplinks. Its 12-U form factor allows dense insertion of line-rate 100 GbE modules, so the customer can meet the required speed to the aggregation layer while planning future expansion in the same chassis. Native support for 100 GbE QSFP+ ports and optional 25/50 GbE breakout modules gives the flexibility needed for a future-proof deployment. The chassis also provides chassis-wide management, redundant power supplies, and fabric redundancy, which are essential for mission-critical core environments. Scalability: Up to 12 U of slots can host additional line cards, allowing the customer to increase port density or add services (e.g., routing, firewall) without replacing the chassis. This aligns directly with the stated requirement to “scale to a 12U chassis.”Why the other models are less suitableCX 6400 – Fixed-configuration switch; it only offers 1/10/25 GbE ports and cannot meet the 100 GbE requirement nor scale to a 12U chassis. CX 9300 – A campus-core switch designed for Ethernet up to 40 GbE; it lacks native 100 GbE ports and does not offer a modular chassis that can grow to 12 U. CX 8325 – Primarily a spine switch for data-center fabrics; it is optimized for fabric interconnects rather than aggregation layer connectivity and does not provide the necessary aggregation ports or 12U scaling capability for this use case.Conclusion – The CX 10000 uniquely satisfies both the 100 GbE aggregation link requirement and the need for a scalable 12U modular chassis, making it the most appropriate initial recommendation.
HPE Aruba CX 10000 Switch Series – Product Overview – https://www.hpe.com/us/en/servers/storage/aruba-cx10000.html Aruba CX 10000 Series Specifications (100 GbE modules and chassis capacity) – https://docs.hpe.com/doclib/cx-series-switches/cx10000/specification/cx10000_specification.pdf
Based on the given output:Which HPE Aruba Networking CX switch can be used to create this configuration?
Answer(s): C
Which statement is true given the IP address 10.64.0.240 and subnet mask 255.255.254.0?
Technical justificationThe subnet mask 255.255.254.0 in binary is 11111111.11111111.11111110.00000000 , which carries 23 network bits ( /23). Consequently, the host portion consists of 9 bits (32 − 23 = 9). Since 9 > 8, statement B (“There are more than 8 bits in the host portion”) is true. The address 10.64.0.240 is not a broadcast address; a broadcast would require all host bits set to 1, yielding 10.64.1.255 . Hence statement A is false. The network portion with a /23 mask spans the first 23 bits, covering 10.64.0.0/23 . Claiming the network portion is simply 10.64. (only two octets) ignores the extra host bit in the third octet, so statement C is inaccurate. The prefix length derived from the mask is /23 , not /25 ; therefore statement D is incorrect.
Cisco Documentation – Understanding IP Subnet Masks: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipaddr_cfg-xml/#ipaddr_cfg_1513m allocate RFC 791 – Internet Protocol; defines subnet mask representation and prefix length: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc791
You are checking the interface details for an Access Point that cannot reach HPE Aruba Networking Central. After reviewing the following output, which statement is true?
A network is configured with two 2930F switches as the aggregation layer. Each 2930F switch has ten connections. The network has twenty 2530 access switches connected to both aggregation switches with 1Gb RJ45. Your task is to replace the aggregation switches with CX 6200 models. In this scenario, which configuration would provide redundancy using two ports on the access switches to the aggregation layer?
Why option A is correctVSF (Virtual Switching Fabric) creates a single logical entity from the two CX 6200 aggregation switches, giving them a shared control plane and MAC-address table. This allows the two physical switches to act as one unit for redundancy and load-balancing. By configuring a LAG that terminates on both CX 6200 members and terminates on the paired 2530 access switches, each access switch uses two ports that belong to the same LAG across the VSF. The LAG provides link-level redundancy; if one physical link to a CX 6200 fails, traffic is automatically shifted to the second member of the LAG without interruption. The combination of VSF (structural redundancy of the aggregation layer) and a LAG (port-level redundancy for each access switch) satisfies the requirement to “use two ports on the access switches to the aggregation layer” while keeping the configuration simple and supported on CX 6200.Why the other choices are less suitableB: Single-domain VSF for CX 6200 and 2530 – VSF can only span like-model switches; mixing CX 6200 with 2530 in the same VSF domain is not supported, so this approach cannot provide the needed redundancy across both switches. C: LAG on the 2530 to both CX 6200 switches – While a LAG on the 2530 can aggregate traffic to the two aggregation switches, it does not address the redundancy of the aggregation layer itself (i.e., no VSF or stacking to ensure the two CX 6200 switches operate as a unified, fail-over-ready fabric). Without VSF, a failure of one CX 6200 would still cause loss of one aggregation path. D: VSF on CX 6200 and stacking with 2530 – 2530 series switches do not support stacking with CX 6200; they can only be connected via LAG or regular trunk links. Introducing “stacking” with 2530 would be technically inaccurate and unsupported, making this option invalid.Implementation brief1. Deploy a Virtual Switching Fabric between the two CX 6200 switches. 2. Create a LAG on each CX 6200 member that includes the two physical ports used by the associated 2530 access switches. 3. Configure the 2530 switches to place the two uplinks into a LAG that terminates on the VSF-joined CX 6200 pair. 4. Verify that spanning-tree and LACP are enabled so that the active/standby state of the LAG adapts automatically to link failures.
HPE CX 6200 Virtual Switching Fabric (VSF) Overview – https://h10075.www1.hpe.com/documents/100071747en-us.pdf HPE 2930F/2530 Link Aggregation and VSF Configuration Guide – https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-a00149572These documents provide the detailed procedures for configuring VSF, forming LAGs across aggregation switches, and verifying redundancy in exactly the scenario described.
Share your comments for HP HPE6-A86 exam with other users:
i gave the amazon dva-c02 tests today and passed. very helpful.
there is an incorrect word in the problem statement. for example, in question 1, there is the word "speci c". this is "specific. in the other question, there is the word "noti cation". this is "notification. these mistakes make this site difficult for me to use.
passed my az-120 certification exam today with 90% marks. studied using the dumps highly recommended to all.
i need it, plz make it available
q47: intrusion prevention system is the correct answer, not patch management. by definition, there are no patches available for a zero-day vulnerability. the way to prevent an attacker from exploiting a zero-day vulnerability is to use an ips.
this is simple but tiugh as well
questão 4, segundo meu compilador local e o site https://www.jdoodle.com/online-java-compiler/, a resposta correta é "c" !
its very useful
i mastered my skills and aced the comptia 220-1102 exam with a score of 920/1000. i give the credit to for my success.
real questions
very helpful assessments
hi there, i would like to get dumps for this exam
i studied for the microsoft azure az-204 exam through it has 100% real questions available for practice along with various mock tests. i scored 900/1000.
please upload 1z0-1072-23 exam dups
i was hoping if you could please share the pdf as i’m currently preparing to give the exam.
i am looking for oracle 1z0-116 exam
where we can get the answer to the questions
nice questions
question 129 is completely wrong.
i need dump
love the site.
can you please upload it back?
could you please re-upload this exam? thanks a lot!
great about shared quiz
goood helping
pay attention to questions. they are very tricky. i waould say about 80 to 85% of the questions are in this exam dump.
wish you would allow more free questions
great simulation
very g inood
q35 should be a
sap c_ts450_2021
ecellent materil for unserstanding
good so far