Amazon
Avaya
Checkpoint
Cisco®
CompTIA
CrowdStrike
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
Google
ISC
ISC2
ITIL®
Juniper
Microsoft
Okta
Palo Alto Networks
Salesforce
All Vendors
  1. Home
  2. APMG-International
  3. AgilePM-Practitioner

APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner Exam (page: 5)
APMG-International Agile Project Management (AgilePM) Practitioner
Updated on: 25-Dec-2025

Viewing Page 5 of 28
AgilePM-Practitioner PDF 134 Questions

Overview
Scenario:

Hoy Hall Hotel Refurbishment Project

Note:
Hoy Hall, a historic, timber-framed building dating from the 17th century, was originally the residence of the Lords of the Manor of Hoytown. The building is registered as a Heritage Building of Special Interest and is subject to restrictions in terms of development. Used as a hotel for over a century, it has recently fallen into disrepair, and for two years it has been completely unused, accelerating its deterioration. The local community has formed the Action Group "Hoy for Hoy Hall" to save the building, and wants to be closely involved in its future success.

After much discussion Hoy Hall has been purchased by Architecture Angels (AA), a small company whose directors are experienced hoteliers. Five years ago they decided to move into the property renovation business and have recently restored two other similarly-endangered buildings for use as hotels.

Architecture Angels are keen to both support local businesses and to have local people run their hotels, giving them a significant amount of autonomy to do this. To maintain core consistency, the hotels use Architecture Angels' Head Office services, such as IT operations, accounting, payroll, stocktaking, compliance, human resources and property management. The Head Office is based 80 miles from Hoy Hall.

Recently Architecture Angels commenced an Agile project to renovate Hoy Hall, which has a large downstairs hall and reception area, and 20 potential bedrooms upstairs. The roof requires extensive repairs and the electrical and plumbing installations require complete replacement. The 40 acres of land around the site are overgrown and need to be restored, and the driveway needs re-laying.

In the hotel industry, the trend for direct customer bookings via the internet has had a major impact on the growth of those hotels with this facility. Online booking now accounts for around 80% of room bookings, with only 20% being made via walk-in and telephone enquiries. Before Hoy Hall can open for business, a reservation system must be fully operational.

Architecture Angels use contractors to manage such work and have good relationships with two local companies: Timber Tigers (TT) who will handle the internal works, and Earth Excavations (EE) who will handle the gardens.

A Project Manager, who has since left the company, started the Feasibility phase. This phase has been continued by the Senior Management Team, which consists of the Sales, Marketing, and Finance Directors and the Chief Executive. This was scheduled to take a month and has almost been completed. A Feasibility Assessment has been produced. An Outline Business Case has been completed which assessed the project as being viable.

The Architecture Angels Senior Management Team will be responsible for Steering the project.

The table below shows the appointments planned for the project team and is subject to change.



Additional Information:
The project is approaching the end of Feasibility. The original Project Manager was involved in drafting a Delivery Plan for the project but not in the outline refurbishment options.

The Senior Management Team generated several options for the refurbishment. All the options included a landscaping solution for the gardens and re-laying of the driveway, as the solution will not be acceptable without these. However, the best solution for the refurbishment is still under debate. The new Project Manager has suggested that a Feasibility Prototype could consist of paper-based drawings for each option. The "Hoy for Hoy Hall" Action Group thinks that a physically-built representation is mandatory for a prototype and wants a small-scale model of the recommendation for the building. The time available to produce this, however, is limited.

Contracts for resources have not yet been signed and will be postponed until the chosen outline solution has been agreed.



How should the lack of provision of a fire escape from the upstairs of the building in Timebox B initially be dealt with?

  1. The Solution Development Team should revise the Timebox Plans for Timeboxes B and C.
  2. The Solution Development Team should commence understanding and delivering the new requirement.
  3. The Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator, should escalate the issue to Architecture Angels' Senior Management Team.
  4. The Project Manager should escalate the issue to the Marketing Director, who is in the role of Business Visionary.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

The initial action to deal with the lack of provision of a fire escape from the upstairs of the building in Timebox B should be:
C: The Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator, should escalate the issue to Architecture Angels' Senior Management Team.
This is because the lack of a fire escape is a significant safety concern that could have legal and regulatory implications. It's important that the Senior Management Team is aware of this issue so they can make informed decisions about how to address it. The Architect, in the role of Technical Co- ordinator, is well-positioned to understand the technical implications of this issue and communicate them to the Senior Management Team.
While revising the Timebox Plans (option A) or commencing understanding and delivering the new requirement (option B) could be part of the solution, these actions should be taken after the issue has been escalated and discussed with the Senior Management Team. Escalating the issue to the Marketing Director (option D) may not be the most effective course of action, as this is primarily a technical and safety issue, not a marketing one.




Overview
Scenario:

Hoy Hall Hotel Refurbishment Project

Note:
Hoy Hall, a historic, timber-framed building dating from the 17th century, was originally the residence of the Lords of the Manor of Hoytown. The building is registered as a Heritage Building of Special Interest and is subject to restrictions in terms of development. Used as a hotel for over a century, it has recently fallen into disrepair, and for two years it has been completely unused, accelerating its deterioration. The local community has formed the Action Group "Hoy for Hoy Hall" to save the building, and wants to be closely involved in its future success.

After much discussion Hoy Hall has been purchased by Architecture Angels (AA), a small company whose directors are experienced hoteliers. Five years ago they decided to move into the property renovation business and have recently restored two other similarly-endangered buildings for use as hotels.

Architecture Angels are keen to both support local businesses and to have local people run their hotels, giving them a significant amount of autonomy to do this. To maintain core consistency, the hotels use Architecture Angels' Head Office services, such as IT operations, accounting, payroll, stocktaking, compliance, human resources and property management. The Head Office is based 80 miles from Hoy Hall.

Recently Architecture Angels commenced an Agile project to renovate Hoy Hall, which has a large downstairs hall and reception area, and 20 potential bedrooms upstairs. The roof requires extensive repairs and the electrical and plumbing installations require complete replacement. The 40 acres of land around the site are overgrown and need to be restored, and the driveway needs re-laying.

In the hotel industry, the trend for direct customer bookings via the internet has had a major impact on the growth of those hotels with this facility. Online booking now accounts for around 80% of room bookings, with only 20% being made via walk-in and telephone enquiries. Before Hoy Hall can open for business, a reservation system must be fully operational.

Architecture Angels use contractors to manage such work and have good relationships with two local companies: Timber Tigers (TT) who will handle the internal works, and Earth Excavations (EE) who will handle the gardens.

A Project Manager, who has since left the company, started the Feasibility phase. This phase has been continued by the Senior Management Team, which consists of the Sales, Marketing, and Finance Directors and the Chief Executive. This was scheduled to take a month and has almost been completed. A Feasibility Assessment has been produced. An Outline Business Case has been completed which assessed the project as being viable.

The Architecture Angels Senior Management Team will be responsible for Steering the project.

The table below shows the appointments planned for the project team and is subject to change.



Additional Information:
The project is approaching the end of Feasibility. The original Project Manager was involved in drafting a Delivery Plan for the project but not in the outline refurbishment options.

The Senior Management Team generated several options for the refurbishment. All the options included a landscaping solution for the gardens and re-laying of the driveway, as the solution will not be acceptable without these. However, the best solution for the refurbishment is still under debate. The new Project Manager has suggested that a Feasibility Prototype could consist of paper-based drawings for each option. The "Hoy for Hoy Hall" Action Group thinks that a physically-built representation is mandatory for a prototype and wants a small-scale model of the recommendation for the building. The time available to produce this, however, is limited.

Contracts for resources have not yet been signed and will be postponed until the chosen outline solution has been agreed.



What should be done to allow the requirement for a secondary exit from the upstairs of the building to be changed into a Must Have priority and moved into Timebox B?

  1. The Project Manager should extend the timescale of Timebox B and shorten Timebox C.
  2. The Solution Development Team should change a Must Have requirement into a Should Have in the Prioritised Requirements List.
  3. The Business Visionary, Business Sponsor and Solution Development Team should reassess the Prioritised Requirements List and its priorities.
  4. The Project Manager should move a Must Have requirement from Timebox B into Timebox C.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

C: The Business Visionary, Business Sponsor and Solution Development Team should reassess the Prioritised Requirements List and its priorities.
Rationale:
In Agile Project Management, priorities are often reassessed and reprioritized based on new information or changes in the project's context. The need for a secondary exit due to compliance with fire safety regulations would necessitate such a reassessment. The Business Visionary and Business Sponsor, who provide the vision and funding for the project, together with the Solution Development Team, who are responsible for implementing solutions, should collaboratively review the Prioritised Requirements List to reflect this new priority. This change must be agreed upon by these key stakeholders to ensure that it aligns with the business needs and project goals.




Overview
Scenario:

Hoy Hall Hotel Refurbishment Project

Note:
Hoy Hall, a historic, timber-framed building dating from the 17th century, was originally the residence of the Lords of the Manor of Hoytown. The building is registered as a Heritage Building of Special Interest and is subject to restrictions in terms of development. Used as a hotel for over a century, it has recently fallen into disrepair, and for two years it has been completely unused, accelerating its deterioration. The local community has formed the Action Group "Hoy for Hoy Hall" to save the building, and wants to be closely involved in its future success.

After much discussion Hoy Hall has been purchased by Architecture Angels (AA), a small company whose directors are experienced hoteliers. Five years ago they decided to move into the property renovation business and have recently restored two other similarly-endangered buildings for use as hotels.

Architecture Angels are keen to both support local businesses and to have local people run their hotels, giving them a significant amount of autonomy to do this. To maintain core consistency, the hotels use Architecture Angels' Head Office services, such as IT operations, accounting, payroll, stocktaking, compliance, human resources and property management. The Head Office is based 80 miles from Hoy Hall.

Recently Architecture Angels commenced an Agile project to renovate Hoy Hall, which has a large downstairs hall and reception area, and 20 potential bedrooms upstairs. The roof requires extensive repairs and the electrical and plumbing installations require complete replacement. The 40 acres of land around the site are overgrown and need to be restored, and the driveway needs re-laying.

In the hotel industry, the trend for direct customer bookings via the internet has had a major impact on the growth of those hotels with this facility. Online booking now accounts for around 80% of room bookings, with only 20% being made via walk-in and telephone enquiries. Before Hoy Hall can open for business, a reservation system must be fully operational.

Architecture Angels use contractors to manage such work and have good relationships with two local companies: Timber Tigers (TT) who will handle the internal works, and Earth Excavations (EE) who will handle the gardens.

A Project Manager, who has since left the company, started the Feasibility phase. This phase has been continued by the Senior Management Team, which consists of the Sales, Marketing, and Finance Directors and the Chief Executive. This was scheduled to take a month and has almost been completed. A Feasibility Assessment has been produced. An Outline Business Case has been completed which assessed the project as being viable.

The Architecture Angels Senior Management Team will be responsible for Steering the project.

The table below shows the appointments planned for the project team and is subject to change.



Additional Information:
The project is approaching the end of Feasibility. The original Project Manager was involved in drafting a Delivery Plan for the project but not in the outline refurbishment options.

The Senior Management Team generated several options for the refurbishment. All the options included a landscaping solution for the gardens and re-laying of the driveway, as the solution will not be acceptable without these. However, the best solution for the refurbishment is still under debate. The new Project Manager has suggested that a Feasibility Prototype could consist of paper-based drawings for each option. The "Hoy for Hoy Hall" Action Group thinks that a physically-built representation is mandatory for a prototype and wants a small-scale model of the recommendation for the building. The time available to produce this, however, is limited.

Contracts for resources have not yet been signed and will be postponed until the chosen outline solution has been agreed.



Who is responsible for approving that the change in priority of the requirement for a secondary exit from the upstairs of the building accurately reflects the scope of the project in the Prioritised Requirements List?

  1. Marketing Director, in the role of Business Visionary.
  2. Project Manager and Solution Development Team.
  3. Project Manager and Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator.
  4. Architecture Angels' Senior Management Team.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

The Senior Management Team, which includes the roles of the Sales, Marketing, and Finance Directors, and the Chief Executive, is typically responsible for steering the project and making decisions that reflect the overall scope and objectives of the project. They would be the appropriate body to approve changes in the project scope as represented in the Prioritised Requirements List, especially for a requirement that has legal and safety implications, such as a secondary fire exit. This team would ensure that such a change aligns with the strategic goals and compliance requirements of the project.




Overview
Scenario:

Hoy Hall Hotel Refurbishment Project

Note:
Hoy Hall, a historic, timber-framed building dating from the 17th century, was originally the residence of the Lords of the Manor of Hoytown. The building is registered as a Heritage Building of Special Interest and is subject to restrictions in terms of development. Used as a hotel for over a century, it has recently fallen into disrepair, and for two years it has been completely unused, accelerating its deterioration. The local community has formed the Action Group "Hoy for Hoy Hall" to save the building, and wants to be closely involved in its future success.

After much discussion Hoy Hall has been purchased by Architecture Angels (AA), a small company whose directors are experienced hoteliers. Five years ago they decided to move into the property renovation business and have recently restored two other similarly-endangered buildings for use as hotels.

Architecture Angels are keen to both support local businesses and to have local people run their hotels, giving them a significant amount of autonomy to do this. To maintain core consistency, the hotels use Architecture Angels' Head Office services, such as IT operations, accounting, payroll, stocktaking, compliance, human resources and property management. The Head Office is based 80 miles from Hoy Hall.

Recently Architecture Angels commenced an Agile project to renovate Hoy Hall, which has a large downstairs hall and reception area, and 20 potential bedrooms upstairs. The roof requires extensive repairs and the electrical and plumbing installations require complete replacement. The 40 acres of land around the site are overgrown and need to be restored, and the driveway needs re-laying.

In the hotel industry, the trend for direct customer bookings via the internet has had a major impact on the growth of those hotels with this facility. Online booking now accounts for around 80% of room bookings, with only 20% being made via walk-in and telephone enquiries. Before Hoy Hall can open for business, a reservation system must be fully operational.

Architecture Angels use contractors to manage such work and have good relationships with two local companies: Timber Tigers (TT) who will handle the internal works, and Earth Excavations (EE) who will handle the gardens.

A Project Manager, who has since left the company, started the Feasibility phase. This phase has been continued by the Senior Management Team, which consists of the Sales, Marketing, and Finance Directors and the Chief Executive. This was scheduled to take a month and has almost been completed. A Feasibility Assessment has been produced. An Outline Business Case has been completed which assessed the project as being viable.

The Architecture Angels Senior Management Team will be responsible for Steering the project.

The table below shows the appointments planned for the project team and is subject to change.



Additional Information:
The project is approaching the end of Feasibility. The original Project Manager was involved in drafting a Delivery Plan for the project but not in the outline refurbishment options.

The Senior Management Team generated several options for the refurbishment. All the options included a landscaping solution for the gardens and re-laying of the driveway, as the solution will not be acceptable without these. However, the best solution for the refurbishment is still under debate. The new Project Manager has suggested that a Feasibility Prototype could consist of paper-based drawings for each option. The "Hoy for Hoy Hall" Action Group thinks that a physically-built representation is mandatory for a prototype and wants a small-scale model of the recommendation for the building. The time available to produce this, however, is limited.

Contracts for resources have not yet been signed and will be postponed until the chosen outline solution has been agreed.



Once the change of priority has been approved, who is then responsible for including the requirement for a secondary exit from the upstairs of the building to the Timebox Plan for Timebox B?

  1. Marketing Director, in the role of Business Visionary.
  2. Team Leader.
  3. Project Manager and Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator.
  4. Architecture Angels' Senior Management Team.

Answer(s): B




Overview
Scenario:

Hoy Hall Hotel Refurbishment Project

Note:
Hoy Hall, a historic, timber-framed building dating from the 17th century, was originally the residence of the Lords of the Manor of Hoytown. The building is registered as a Heritage Building of Special Interest and is subject to restrictions in terms of development. Used as a hotel for over a century, it has recently fallen into disrepair, and for two years it has been completely unused, accelerating its deterioration. The local community has formed the Action Group "Hoy for Hoy Hall" to save the building, and wants to be closely involved in its future success.

After much discussion Hoy Hall has been purchased by Architecture Angels (AA), a small company whose directors are experienced hoteliers. Five years ago they decided to move into the property renovation business and have recently restored two other similarly-endangered buildings for use as hotels.

Architecture Angels are keen to both support local businesses and to have local people run their hotels, giving them a significant amount of autonomy to do this. To maintain core consistency, the hotels use Architecture Angels' Head Office services, such as IT operations, accounting, payroll, stocktaking, compliance, human resources and property management. The Head Office is based 80 miles from Hoy Hall.

Recently Architecture Angels commenced an Agile project to renovate Hoy Hall, which has a large downstairs hall and reception area, and 20 potential bedrooms upstairs. The roof requires extensive repairs and the electrical and plumbing installations require complete replacement. The 40 acres of land around the site are overgrown and need to be restored, and the driveway needs re-laying.

In the hotel industry, the trend for direct customer bookings via the internet has had a major impact on the growth of those hotels with this facility. Online booking now accounts for around 80% of room bookings, with only 20% being made via walk-in and telephone enquiries. Before Hoy Hall can open for business, a reservation system must be fully operational.

Architecture Angels use contractors to manage such work and have good relationships with two local companies: Timber Tigers (TT) who will handle the internal works, and Earth Excavations (EE) who will handle the gardens.

A Project Manager, who has since left the company, started the Feasibility phase. This phase has been continued by the Senior Management Team, which consists of the Sales, Marketing, and Finance Directors and the Chief Executive. This was scheduled to take a month and has almost been completed. A Feasibility Assessment has been produced. An Outline Business Case has been completed which assessed the project as being viable.

The Architecture Angels Senior Management Team will be responsible for Steering the project.

The table below shows the appointments planned for the project team and is subject to change.



Additional Information:
The project is approaching the end of Feasibility. The original Project Manager was involved in drafting a Delivery Plan for the project but not in the outline refurbishment options.

The Senior Management Team generated several options for the refurbishment. All the options included a landscaping solution for the gardens and re-laying of the driveway, as the solution will not be acceptable without these. However, the best solution for the refurbishment is still under debate. The new Project Manager has suggested that a Feasibility Prototype could consist of paper-based drawings for each option. The "Hoy for Hoy Hall" Action Group thinks that a physically-built representation is mandatory for a prototype and wants a small-scale model of the recommendation for the building. The time available to produce this, however, is limited.

Contracts for resources have not yet been signed and will be postponed until the chosen outline solution has been agreed.



HOTSPOT (Drag and Drop is not supported)

Using the project timeline given in the Project Scenario, answer the following question about application of Timeboxing on the Hoy Hall project.

Lines 1 to 5 in the table below consist of an assertion statement and a reason statement. For each line identify the appropriate option, from options A to E, that applies. Each option can be used once, more than once or not at all.



Assertion :

1. All internal works to be assigned to Timber Tigers throughout the project should be consolidated into one Structured Timebox.

BECAUSE

The Investigation step within each Structured Timebox requires everyone working within the team to jointly agree how the requirements of the Timebox will be met.

2. Acceptance criteria for the front rooms to be developed in Timebox A should be described in detail and agreed during the Timebox Kick-Off

BECAUSE

The aim of the Investigation step within each Timebox is to complete as much of the development work as possible.

3. It is appropriate that both the Evolutionary Development phase and Deployment phase are shown in the first Project Increment.

BECAUSE

Each Timebox should comprise an Evolutionary Development phase and Deployment phase.

4. It is appropriate that the outputs of Timebox C are scheduled for deployment at the end of the first Project Increment.

BECAUSE

A typical Timebox Plan should provide a schedule of high-level activities for the imminent Project Increment.

5. It is appropriate that Earth Excavations create a detailed plan of activities they will complete during Timebox C.

Reason

BECAUSE

The Solution Development Team is responsible for planning the detail of all the work of each Timebox.



  1. See Explanation section for answer.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

For each line, here is the appropriate option from A to E that applies:
All internal works to be assigned to Timber Tigers throughout the project should be consolidated into one Structured Timebox.
E. False (Assertion) False (Reason)
Rationale: It is not practical or in line with Agile principles to consolidate all internal works into one Structured Timebox, as the work will likely need to be spread over multiple Timeboxes. Additionally, the Investigation step involves agreeing on how to meet the requirements of the Timebox, not necessarily consolidating all work into one.
Acceptance criteria for the front rooms to be developed in Timebox A should be described in detail and agreed during the Timebox Kick-Off
B: True (Assertion) True (Reason) BUT the reason does not explain the assertion Rationale: While it is true that acceptance criteria should be agreed upon during the Timebox Kick- Off, the reason given is incorrect because the aim of the Investigation step is not necessarily to complete as much development work as possible but to plan and understand the work that will be carried out.
It is appropriate that both the Evolutionary Development phase and Deployment phase are shown in the first Project Increment.
A: True (Assertion) True (Reason) AND the reason explains the assertion Rationale: Each Timebox should indeed include both Evolutionary Development and a Deployment phase. This assertion and reason correctly align with the concept of Timeboxing in Agile. It is appropriate that the outputs of Timebox C are scheduled for deployment at the end of the first Project Increment.

A: True (Assertion) True (Reason) AND the reason explains the assertion Rationale: The typical Timebox Plan does provide a schedule of high-level activities for the imminent Project Increment, which would include planning for deployment. It is appropriate that Earth Excavations create a detailed plan of activities they will complete during Timebox C.
C: True (Assertion) False (Reason)
Rationale: While it is true that Earth Excavations should create a detailed plan for their activities in Timebox C, the reason is incorrect as the Solution Development Team is not solely responsible for planning all work details within a Timebox. This task would typically be a collaborative effort involving all relevant parties.



Viewing Page 5 of 28



Share your comments for APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner exam with other users:

Anon 10/25/2023 10:48:00 PM

some of the answers seem to be inaccurate. q10 for example shouldnt it be an m custom column?
MALAYSIA


PeterPan 10/18/2023 10:22:00 AM

are the question real or fake?
Anonymous


CW 7/11/2023 3:19:00 PM

thank you for providing such assistance.
UNITED STATES


Mn8300 11/9/2023 8:53:00 AM

nice questions
Anonymous


Nico 4/23/2023 11:41:00 PM

my 3rd purcahse from this site. these exam dumps are helpful. very helpful.
ITALY


Chere 9/15/2023 4:21:00 AM

found it good
Anonymous


Thembelani 5/30/2023 2:47:00 AM

excellent material
Anonymous


vinesh phale 9/11/2023 2:51:00 AM

very helpfull
UNITED STATES


Bhagiii 11/4/2023 7:04:00 AM

well explained.
Anonymous


Rahul 8/8/2023 9:40:00 PM

i need the pdf, please.
CANADA


CW 7/11/2023 2:51:00 PM

a good source for exam preparation
UNITED STATES


Anchal 10/23/2023 4:01:00 PM

nice questions
INDIA


J Nunes 9/29/2023 8:19:00 AM

i need ielts general training audio guide questions
BRAZIL


Ananya 9/14/2023 5:16:00 AM

please make this content available
UNITED STATES


Swathi 6/4/2023 2:18:00 PM

content is good
Anonymous


Leo 7/29/2023 8:45:00 AM

latest dumps please
INDIA


Laolu 2/15/2023 11:04:00 PM

aside from pdf the test engine software is helpful. the interface is user-friendly and intuitive, making it easy to navigate and find the questions.
UNITED STATES


Zaynik 9/17/2023 5:36:00 AM

questions and options are correct, but the answers are wrong sometimes. so please check twice or refer some other platform for the right answer
Anonymous


Massam 6/11/2022 5:55:00 PM

90% of questions was there but i failed the exam, i marked the answers as per the guide but looks like they are not accurate , if not i would have passed the exam given that i saw about 45 of 50 questions from dump
Anonymous


Anonymous 12/27/2023 12:47:00 AM

answer to this question "what administrative safeguards should be implemented to protect the collected data while in use by manasa and her product management team? " it should be (c) for the following reasons: this administrative safeguard involves controlling access to collected data by ensuring that only individuals who need the data for their job responsibilities have access to it. this helps minimize the risk of unauthorized access and potential misuse of sensitive information. while other options such as (a) documenting data flows and (b) conducting a privacy impact assessment (pia) are important steps in data protection, implementing a "need to know" access policy directly addresses the issue of protecting data while in use by limiting access to those who require it for legitimate purposes. (d) is not directly related to safeguarding data during use; it focuses on data transfers and location.
INDIA


Japles 5/23/2023 9:46:00 PM

password lockout being the correct answer for question 37 does not make sense. it should be geofencing.
Anonymous


Faritha 8/10/2023 6:00:00 PM

for question 4, the righr answer is :recover automatically from failures
UNITED STATES


Anonymous 9/14/2023 4:27:00 AM

question number 4s answer is 3, option c. i
UNITED STATES


p das 12/7/2023 11:41:00 PM

very good questions
UNITED STATES


Anna 1/5/2024 1:12:00 AM

i am confused about the answers to the questions. are the answers correct?
KOREA REPUBLIC OF


Bhavya 9/13/2023 10:15:00 AM

very usefull
Anonymous


Rahul Kumar 8/31/2023 12:30:00 PM

need certification.
CANADA


Diran Ole 9/17/2023 5:15:00 PM

great exam prep
CANADA


Venkata Subbarao Bandaru 6/24/2023 8:45:00 AM

i require dump
Anonymous


D 7/15/2023 1:38:00 AM

good morning, could you please upload this exam again,
Anonymous


Ann 9/15/2023 5:39:00 PM

hi can you please upload the dumps for sap contingent module. thanks
AUSTRALIA


Sridhar 1/16/2024 9:19:00 PM

good questions
Anonymous


Summer 10/4/2023 9:57:00 PM

looking forward to the real exam
Anonymous


vv 12/2/2023 2:45:00 PM

good ones for exam preparation
UNITED STATES