2V0-13.24 Exam dumps PDF | Exam-Dumps.net (Page: 3)

QUESTION: 11

As part of a new VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) deployment, a customer is planning to implement vSphere IaaS control plane.
What component could be installed and enabled to implement the solution?

Aria Automation
NSX Edge networking
Storage DRS
Aria Operations

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The vSphere IaaS (Infrastructure-as-a-Service) control plane in VCF 5.2 enables self-service provisioning and automation of virtualized resources, integrating with vSphere's Supervisor Cluster for cloud-like functionality. Option A, "Aria Automation" (formerly vRealize Automation), is the correct component, providing orchestration, cloud templates, and self-service portals to manage IaaS workloads in VCF. It integrates with vSphere and NSX to deliver this capability. Option B, "NSX Edge networking," focuses on networking, not IaaS control. Option C, "Storage DRS," optimizes storage but isn't a control plane. Option D, "Aria Operations," is for monitoring, not provisioning. VMware's documentation confirms Aria Automation's role in VCF IaaS.

Reference:

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architekt Study Guide, Chapter 6: Automation and

Orchestration; VMware Aria Automation 8.10 Product Documentation, vSphere IaaS Integration.

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 12

An architect is preparing a VI Workload Domain design with a dedicated NSX instance. The workload domain is planned to grow up to 300 ESXi hosts within the next six months.
Which is the minimum NSX Manager form factor that should be recommended by the architect for this VI Workload Domain to support the forecasted growth?

Large
Medium
Extra Small
Small

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

NSX Manager in VCF 5.2 comes in form factors (Small, Medium, Large) with capacity limits based on managed objects (hosts, VMs, etc.). A VI Workload Domain with a dedicated NSX instance growing to 300 ESXi hosts requires a form factor supporting this scale. Per NSX-T 3.2 sizing guidelines (used in VCF 5.2), the Large form factor supports up to 1,024 hosts, 12,000 VMs, and extensive networking objects, making it suitable for 300 hosts and future growth. Medium supports up to 256 hosts, which is close but risks being exceeded with additional VMs or objects. Small (64 hosts) and Extra Small (lab use) are insufficient. The architect must recommend "Large" (A) to ensure scalability and performance for this VI domain.

Reference:

NSX-T 3.2 Reference Design Guide (VCF 5.2 compatible), Section on NSX Manager Sizing; VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Deployment Guide, Workload Domain Sizing.

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 13

A customer is deploying VCF at a new datacenter location. They will migrate their workloads from the existing datacenter to the new VCF platform over six months. Both datacenters will run simultaneously for six months during the migration.
Which of the following should be a documented risk?

Six months may not be enough time to complete the migration.
There will be connectivity between the two locations.
Bandwidth between the two locations is sufficient to accommodate the workload migration.
Workloads will be powered off during migration.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

In VCF design, risks are potential issues that could jeopardize project success, documented to prompt mitigation planning. Option A, "Six months may not be enough time to complete the migration," is a valid risk because workload migration complexity (e.g., application dependencies, data volume, testing) could exceed the timeline, a common challenge in VCF deployments. Option B (connectivity) is a fact, not a risk, unless qualified as unreliable. Option C (sufficient bandwidth) is an assumption or requirement, not a risk unless proven inadequate. Option D (powering off workloads) is a design choice, not an inherent risk without evidence. VCF migration planning emphasizes timeline risks, making A the best choice.

Reference:

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide, Chapter 5: Risk Assessment; VMware Migration Best Practices for VCF.

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 14

An architect had gathered the following requirements and constraints for a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) deployment.

Requirements:

* User interface (UI) SSL certificates must have a maximum validity of 6 months.

* Have the least possible administrative time to install and renew certificates.

* Each certificate must be created on a per VCF component basis.

Constraints:

* Limited administrative skillsets on SSL certificate administration

* Limited operational expenditure budget for SSL certificates

Which design decision should be made to satisfy the stated requirement(s) and constraint(s)?

Use wildcard certificates
Use and configure integration with a certificate vendor such as DigiCert
Disable the use of SSL certificates for user interfaces
Use and configure integration with Microsoft Certificate Authority (CA)

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

The requirements demand per-component certificates with 6-month validity and minimal admin effort, while constraints limit skills and budget. Option D, "Use and configure integration with Microsoft Certificate Authority (CA)," meets all criteria: Microsoft CA (integrated via SDDC Manager in VCF 5.2) supports individual certificates per component (e.g., vCenter, NSX), allows short validity periods, automates renewal (reducing effort), and leverages existing infrastructure (low cost, skill- friendly). Option A (wildcard certificates) violates per-component needs. Option B (DigiCert) incurs higher costs and requires more skill. Option C (disabling SSL) compromises security, failing compliance. Microsoft CA aligns with VCF's certificate management capabilities.

Reference:

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide, Section on Certificate Management with Microsoft CA; VMware Validated Design 6.2, Certificate Authority Integration.

Reveal Solution Next Question

QUESTION: 15

A design requirement has been specified for a new VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) instance. All managed workload resources must be lifecycle managed with the following criteria:

* Development resources must be automatically reclaimed after two weeks

* Production resources will be reviewed yearly for reclamation

* Resources identified for reclamation must allow time for review and possible extension

What capability will satisfy the requirements?

Aria Suite Lifecycle Content Management
Aria Operations Rightsizing Recommendations
Aria Automation Lease Policy
Aria Automation Project Membership

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Lifecycle management of resources in VCF 5.2 involves automation tools like Aria Automation. Option C, "Aria Automation Lease Policy," allows setting expiration dates for resources (e.g., 2 weeks for dev, 1 year for prod), automatically reclaiming them unless extended during a review period, directly meeting all criteria. Option A (Aria Suite Lifecycle) manages software deployment, not resource lifecycles. Option B (Aria Operations Rightsizing) provides sizing insights, not reclamation automation. Option D (Project Membership) controls access, not lifecycles. Aria Automation's lease policies are designed for this exact purpose in VCF, integrating with cloud zones and projects.

Reference:

VMware Aria Automation 8.10 Administration Guide, Section on Lease Policies; VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Study Guide, Automation Features.

Reveal Solution Next Question

VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam (page: 3) VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Updated on: 29-Mar-2026

QUESTION: 11

Explanation:

Reference:

QUESTION: 12

Explanation:

Reference:

QUESTION: 13

Explanation:

Reference:

QUESTION: 14

Explanation:

Reference:

QUESTION: 15

Explanation:

Reference:

VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam (page: 3)
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect
Updated on: 29-Mar-2026