Amazon
Avaya
Cisco
CompTIA
CrowdStrike
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
Google
ISC
ISC2
ITIL
Juniper
Microsoft
NVIDIA
Okta
Palo Alto Networks
Salesforce
SAP
ServiceNow
All Vendors
  1. Home
  2. PECB
  3. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer

PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Questions in PDF

Free PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Dumps Questions (page: 3)

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer PDF — 215 Questions

HealthGenic is a Swedish pharmaceutical company that specializes in developing human therapeutics. The development process of human therapeutics requires analyzing the medical history of many patients. As the company handles sensitive information of millions of patients, an information security management system (ISMS) was critical to ensure the protection of their assets and improve their information security.
HealthGenic has had an ISMS in place for the past two years. Once the ISMS was implemented, HealthGenic changed its approach from correcting to preventing information security incidents. Since no issues were faced during the last two years, the top management of HealthGenic decided not to conduct a management review, nor did they appoint a team to perform the internal audits as planned. In addition, the IT team totally neglected the regular monitoring and measurement and performance evaluation processes.
Just before the recertification audit, the company asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years. This left the production sector with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Emma, HealthGenic's information security officer, was assigned by the top management to conduct the internal audit. As an employee of the company, Emma had access to all offices and documentation of HealthGenic. With hundreds of report pages written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever. Emma concluded that HealthGenic must have a better plan on monitoring the progress of their ISMS. In addition, she concluded that monitoring and measurement, performance evaluation, and management reviews should be conducted at planned intervals. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations.

If an organization wants to monitor operations in real time and notify users about deviations, which type of dashboard should be used?

  1. Strategic dashboard
  2. Tactical dashboard
  3. Operational dashboard

Answer(s): C




HealthGenic is a Swedish pharmaceutical company that specializes in developing human therapeutics. The development process of human therapeutics requires analyzing the medical history of many patients. As the company handles sensitive information of millions of patients, an information security management system (ISMS) was critical to ensure the protection of their assets and improve their information security.
HealthGenic has had an ISMS in place for the past two years. Once the ISMS was implemented, HealthGenic changed its approach from correcting to preventing information security incidents. Since no issues were faced during the last two years, the top management of HealthGenic decided not to conduct a management review, nor did they appoint a team to perform the internal audits as planned. In addition, the IT team totally neglected the regular monitoring and measurement and performance evaluation processes.
Just before the recertification audit, the company asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years. This left the production sector with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Emma, HealthGenic's information security officer, was assigned by the top management to conduct the internal audit. As an employee of the company, Emma had access to all offices and documentation of HealthGenic. With hundreds of report pages written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever. Emma concluded that HealthGenic must have a better plan on monitoring the progress of their ISMS. In addition, she concluded that monitoring and measurement, performance evaluation, and management reviews should be conducted at planned intervals. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations.

Who should verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee after an internal audit?

  1. An independent auditor should be contracted to perform this evaluation
  2. The internal auditor
  3. The information security manager

Answer(s): B




HealthGenic is a Swedish pharmaceutical company that specializes in developing human therapeutics. The development process of human therapeutics requires analyzing the medical history of many patients. As the company handles sensitive information of millions of patients, an information security management system (ISMS) was critical to ensure the protection of their assets and improve their information security.
HealthGenic has had an ISMS in place for the past two years. Once the ISMS was implemented, HealthGenic changed its approach from correcting to preventing information security incidents. Since no issues were faced during the last two years, the top management of HealthGenic decided not to conduct a management review, nor did they appoint a team to perform the internal audits as planned. In addition, the IT team totally neglected the regular monitoring and measurement and performance evaluation processes.
Just before the recertification audit, the company asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years. This left the production sector with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Emma, HealthGenic's information security officer, was assigned by the top management to conduct the internal audit. As an employee of the company, Emma had access to all offices and documentation of HealthGenic. With hundreds of report pages written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever. Emma concluded that HealthGenic must have a better plan on monitoring the progress of their ISMS. In addition, she concluded that monitoring and measurement, performance evaluation, and management reviews should be conducted at planned intervals. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations.

Company X restricted the access of the internal auditor to some of its documentation taking into account its confidentiality. Is this acceptable?

  1. Yes, it is up to the company to determine what an internal auditor can access
  2. Yes, confidential information should not be accessed by internal auditors
  3. No, restricting the internal auditor s access to offices and documentation can negatively affect the internal audit process

Answer(s): C




Texas H&H Inc. is a multinational corporation headquartered in Boston, MA, which provides professional electronics, gaming, and entertainment services. The company decided to utilize cloud storage services which best suited its needs, due to the large amount of data that the company processes daily. Recently, Texas H&H Inc. learned that the cloud storage provider that it uses has been publicly compromised.
Being aware of the high risk of data exposure, the security administrators of Texas H&H Inc. decided to undertake actions that could prevent a potential attack. In the absence of an information security incident management policy, their response was based on their knowledge gained from previous incidents. They tested their systems for any malicious activity or violation and checked if the cloud-based email settings were changed. By quickly responding to the exploited vulnerability that was found, the team was able to prevent the attack.
Once they made sure that the attackers do not have access in their system, the security administrators decided to proceed with the forensic analysis. They concluded that their access security system was not designed for threat detection, including the detection of malicious files which could be the cause of possible future attacks
Based on these findings, Texas H&H Inc. decided to modify its access security system to avoid future incidents and integrate an incident management policy in their information security policy that could serve as guidance for employees on how to respond to similar incidents.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Texas H&H Inc. decided to integrate the incident management policy to the existent information security policy. How do you define this situation?

  1. Acceptable, the incident management policy may be integrated into the overall information security policy of the organization
  2. Acceptable, but only if the incident management policy addresses environmental, or health and safety issues
  3. Unacceptable, the incident management policy should be drafted as a separate document in order to be clear and effective

Answer(s): A




Texas H&H Inc. is a multinational corporation headquartered in Boston, MA, which provides professional electronics, gaming, and entertainment services. The company decided to utilize cloud storage services which best suited its needs, due to the large amount of data that the company processes daily. Recently, Texas H&H Inc. learned that the cloud storage provider that it uses has been publicly compromised.
Being aware of the high risk of data exposure, the security administrators of Texas H&H Inc. decided to undertake actions that could prevent a potential attack. In the absence of an information security incident management policy, their response was based on their knowledge gained from previous incidents. They tested their systems for any malicious activity or violation and checked if the cloud-based email settings were changed. By quickly responding to the exploited vulnerability that was found, the team was able to prevent the attack.
Once they made sure that the attackers do not have access in their system, the security administrators decided to proceed with the forensic analysis. They concluded that their access security system was not designed for threat detection, including the detection of malicious files which could be the cause of possible future attacks
Based on these findings, Texas H&H Inc. decided to modify its access security system to avoid future incidents and integrate an incident management policy in their information security policy that could serve as guidance for employees on how to respond to similar incidents.

Texas H&H Inc. decided to assign an internal expert for their forensic analysis. Is this acceptable? Refer to scenario 15.

  1. Yes, forensic analysis can be done by either an internal or external expert
  2. Yes, hiring an external expert for forensic analysis is a requirement of the standard
  3. No, the company's forensic analysis should be based on the conclusion of its cloud storage provide investigation

Answer(s): A



Viewing page 3 of 28

Share your comments for PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam with other users:

A
AbedRabbou Alaqabna
12/18/2023 3:10:00 AM

q50: which two functions can be used by an end user when pivoting an interactive report? the correct answer is a, c because we do not have rank in the function pivoting you can check in the apex app

GREECE
R
Rohan Limaye
12/30/2023 8:52:00 AM

best to practice

Anonymous
A
Aparajeeta
10/13/2023 2:42:00 PM

so far it is good

Anonymous
V
Vgf
7/20/2023 3:59:00 PM

please provide me the dump

Anonymous
D
Deno
10/25/2023 1:14:00 AM

i failed the cisa exam today. but i have found all the questions that were on the exam to be on this site.

Anonymous
C
CiscoStudent
11/15/2023 5:29:00 AM

in question 272 the right answer states that an autonomous acces point is "configured and managed by the wlc" but this is not what i have learned in my ccna course. is this a mistake? i understand that lightweight aps are managed by wlc while autonomous work as standalones on the wlan.

Anonymous
P
pankaj
9/28/2023 4:36:00 AM

it was helpful

Anonymous
U
User123
10/8/2023 9:59:00 AM

good question

UNITED STATES
V
vinay
9/4/2023 10:23:00 AM

really nice

Anonymous
U
Usman
8/28/2023 10:07:00 AM

please i need dumps for isc2 cybersecuity

Anonymous
Q
Q44
7/30/2023 11:50:00 AM

ans is coldline i think

UNITED STATES
A
Anuj
12/21/2023 1:30:00 PM

very helpful

Anonymous
G
Giri
9/13/2023 10:31:00 PM

can you please provide dumps so that it helps me more

UNITED STATES
A
Aaron
2/8/2023 12:10:00 AM

thank you for providing me with the updated question and answers. this version has all the questions from the exam. i just saw them in my exam this morning. i passed my exam today.

SOUTH AFRICA
S
Sarwar
12/21/2023 4:54:00 PM

how i can see exam questions?

CANADA
C
Chengchaone
9/11/2023 10:22:00 AM

can you please upload please?

Anonymous
M
Mouli
9/2/2023 7:02:00 AM

question 75: option c is correct answer

Anonymous
J
JugHead
9/27/2023 2:40:00 PM

please add this exam

Anonymous
S
sushant
6/28/2023 4:38:00 AM

please upoad

EUROPEAN UNION
J
John
8/7/2023 12:09:00 AM

has anyone recently attended safe 6.0 certification? is it the samq question from here.

Anonymous
B
Blessious Phiri
8/14/2023 3:49:00 PM

expository experience

Anonymous
C
concerned citizen
12/29/2023 11:31:00 AM

52 should be b&c. controller failure has nothing to do with this type of issue. degraded state tells us its a raid issue, and if the os is missing then the bootable device isnt found. the only other consideration could be data loss but thats somewhat broad whereas b&c show understanding of the specific issues the question is asking about.

UNITED STATES
D
deedee
12/23/2023 5:10:00 PM

great help!!!

UNITED STATES
S
Samir
8/1/2023 3:07:00 PM

very useful tools

UNITED STATES
S
Saeed
11/7/2023 3:14:00 AM

looks a good platform to prepare az-104

Anonymous
M
Matiullah
6/24/2023 7:37:00 AM

want to pass the exam

Anonymous
S
SN
9/5/2023 2:25:00 PM

good resource

UNITED STATES
Z
Zoubeyr
9/8/2023 5:56:00 AM

question 11 : d

FRANCE
U
User
8/29/2023 3:24:00 AM

only the free dumps will be enough for pass, or have to purchase the premium one. please suggest.

Anonymous
C
CW
7/6/2023 7:37:00 PM

good questions. thanks.

Anonymous
F
Farooqi
11/21/2023 1:37:00 AM

good for practice.

INDIA
I
Isaac
10/28/2023 2:30:00 PM

great case study

UNITED STATES
M
Malviya
2/3/2023 9:10:00 AM

the questions in this exam dumps is valid. i passed my test last monday. i only whish they had their pricing in inr instead of usd. but it is still worth it.

INDIA
R
rsmyth
5/18/2023 12:44:00 PM

q40 the answer is not d, why are you giving incorrect answers? snapshot consolidation is used to merge the snapshot delta disk files to the vm base disk

IRELAND
AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!