Amazon
Anthropic
Avaya
Cisco
CompTIA
CrowdStrike
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
Google
ISC
ISC2
ITIL
Juniper
Microsoft
NVIDIA
Okta
Palo Alto Networks
Salesforce
SAP
All Vendors

PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Dumps in PDF

Free PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Real Questions (page: 3)

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer PDF — 215 Questions

HealthGenic is a Swedish pharmaceutical company that specializes in developing human therapeutics. The development process of human therapeutics requires analyzing the medical history of many patients. As the company handles sensitive information of millions of patients, an information security management system (ISMS) was critical to ensure the protection of their assets and improve their information security.
HealthGenic has had an ISMS in place for the past two years. Once the ISMS was implemented, HealthGenic changed its approach from correcting to preventing information security incidents. Since no issues were faced during the last two years, the top management of HealthGenic decided not to conduct a management review, nor did they appoint a team to perform the internal audits as planned. In addition, the IT team totally neglected the regular monitoring and measurement and performance evaluation processes.
Just before the recertification audit, the company asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years. This left the production sector with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Emma, HealthGenic's information security officer, was assigned by the top management to conduct the internal audit. As an employee of the company, Emma had access to all offices and documentation of HealthGenic. With hundreds of report pages written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever. Emma concluded that HealthGenic must have a better plan on monitoring the progress of their ISMS. In addition, she concluded that monitoring and measurement, performance evaluation, and management reviews should be conducted at planned intervals. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations.

If an organization wants to monitor operations in real time and notify users about deviations, which type of dashboard should be used?

  1. Strategic dashboard
  2. Tactical dashboard
  3. Operational dashboard

Answer(s): C




HealthGenic is a Swedish pharmaceutical company that specializes in developing human therapeutics. The development process of human therapeutics requires analyzing the medical history of many patients. As the company handles sensitive information of millions of patients, an information security management system (ISMS) was critical to ensure the protection of their assets and improve their information security.
HealthGenic has had an ISMS in place for the past two years. Once the ISMS was implemented, HealthGenic changed its approach from correcting to preventing information security incidents. Since no issues were faced during the last two years, the top management of HealthGenic decided not to conduct a management review, nor did they appoint a team to perform the internal audits as planned. In addition, the IT team totally neglected the regular monitoring and measurement and performance evaluation processes.
Just before the recertification audit, the company asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years. This left the production sector with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Emma, HealthGenic's information security officer, was assigned by the top management to conduct the internal audit. As an employee of the company, Emma had access to all offices and documentation of HealthGenic. With hundreds of report pages written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever. Emma concluded that HealthGenic must have a better plan on monitoring the progress of their ISMS. In addition, she concluded that monitoring and measurement, performance evaluation, and management reviews should be conducted at planned intervals. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations.

Who should verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee after an internal audit?

  1. An independent auditor should be contracted to perform this evaluation
  2. The internal auditor
  3. The information security manager

Answer(s): B




HealthGenic is a Swedish pharmaceutical company that specializes in developing human therapeutics. The development process of human therapeutics requires analyzing the medical history of many patients. As the company handles sensitive information of millions of patients, an information security management system (ISMS) was critical to ensure the protection of their assets and improve their information security.
HealthGenic has had an ISMS in place for the past two years. Once the ISMS was implemented, HealthGenic changed its approach from correcting to preventing information security incidents. Since no issues were faced during the last two years, the top management of HealthGenic decided not to conduct a management review, nor did they appoint a team to perform the internal audits as planned. In addition, the IT team totally neglected the regular monitoring and measurement and performance evaluation processes.
Just before the recertification audit, the company asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years. This left the production sector with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Emma, HealthGenic's information security officer, was assigned by the top management to conduct the internal audit. As an employee of the company, Emma had access to all offices and documentation of HealthGenic. With hundreds of report pages written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever. Emma concluded that HealthGenic must have a better plan on monitoring the progress of their ISMS. In addition, she concluded that monitoring and measurement, performance evaluation, and management reviews should be conducted at planned intervals. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations.

Company X restricted the access of the internal auditor to some of its documentation taking into account its confidentiality. Is this acceptable?

  1. Yes, it is up to the company to determine what an internal auditor can access
  2. Yes, confidential information should not be accessed by internal auditors
  3. No, restricting the internal auditor s access to offices and documentation can negatively affect the internal audit process

Answer(s): C




Texas H&H Inc. is a multinational corporation headquartered in Boston, MA, which provides professional electronics, gaming, and entertainment services. The company decided to utilize cloud storage services which best suited its needs, due to the large amount of data that the company processes daily. Recently, Texas H&H Inc. learned that the cloud storage provider that it uses has been publicly compromised.
Being aware of the high risk of data exposure, the security administrators of Texas H&H Inc. decided to undertake actions that could prevent a potential attack. In the absence of an information security incident management policy, their response was based on their knowledge gained from previous incidents. They tested their systems for any malicious activity or violation and checked if the cloud-based email settings were changed. By quickly responding to the exploited vulnerability that was found, the team was able to prevent the attack.
Once they made sure that the attackers do not have access in their system, the security administrators decided to proceed with the forensic analysis. They concluded that their access security system was not designed for threat detection, including the detection of malicious files which could be the cause of possible future attacks
Based on these findings, Texas H&H Inc. decided to modify its access security system to avoid future incidents and integrate an incident management policy in their information security policy that could serve as guidance for employees on how to respond to similar incidents.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Texas H&H Inc. decided to integrate the incident management policy to the existent information security policy. How do you define this situation?

  1. Acceptable, the incident management policy may be integrated into the overall information security policy of the organization
  2. Acceptable, but only if the incident management policy addresses environmental, or health and safety issues
  3. Unacceptable, the incident management policy should be drafted as a separate document in order to be clear and effective

Answer(s): A




Texas H&H Inc. is a multinational corporation headquartered in Boston, MA, which provides professional electronics, gaming, and entertainment services. The company decided to utilize cloud storage services which best suited its needs, due to the large amount of data that the company processes daily. Recently, Texas H&H Inc. learned that the cloud storage provider that it uses has been publicly compromised.
Being aware of the high risk of data exposure, the security administrators of Texas H&H Inc. decided to undertake actions that could prevent a potential attack. In the absence of an information security incident management policy, their response was based on their knowledge gained from previous incidents. They tested their systems for any malicious activity or violation and checked if the cloud-based email settings were changed. By quickly responding to the exploited vulnerability that was found, the team was able to prevent the attack.
Once they made sure that the attackers do not have access in their system, the security administrators decided to proceed with the forensic analysis. They concluded that their access security system was not designed for threat detection, including the detection of malicious files which could be the cause of possible future attacks
Based on these findings, Texas H&H Inc. decided to modify its access security system to avoid future incidents and integrate an incident management policy in their information security policy that could serve as guidance for employees on how to respond to similar incidents.

Texas H&H Inc. decided to assign an internal expert for their forensic analysis. Is this acceptable? Refer to scenario 15.

  1. Yes, forensic analysis can be done by either an internal or external expert
  2. Yes, hiring an external expert for forensic analysis is a requirement of the standard
  3. No, the company's forensic analysis should be based on the conclusion of its cloud storage provide investigation

Answer(s): A



PDF
Viewing page 3 of 28

Share your comments for PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam with other users:

A
Aderonke
10/23/2023 12:53:00 PM

fantastic assessment on psm 1

UNITED KINGDOM
S
SAJI
7/20/2023 2:51:00 AM

56 question correct answer a,b

Anonymous
R
Raj Kumar
10/23/2023 8:52:00 PM

thank you for providing the q bank

CANADA
P
piyush keshari
7/7/2023 9:46:00 PM

true quesstions

Anonymous
B
B.A.J
11/6/2023 7:01:00 AM

i can´t believe ms asks things like this, seems to be only marketing material.

Anonymous
G
Guss
5/23/2023 12:28:00 PM

hi, could you please add the last update of ns0-527

Anonymous
R
Rond65
8/22/2023 4:39:00 PM

question #3 refers to vnet4 and vnet5. however, there is no vnet5 listed in the case study (testlet 2).

UNITED STATES
C
Cheers
12/13/2023 9:55:00 AM

sometimes it may be good some times it may be

GERMANY
S
Sumita Bose
7/21/2023 1:01:00 AM

qs 4 answer seems wrong- please check

AUSTRALIA
A
Amit
9/7/2023 12:53:00 AM

very detailed explanation !

HONG KONG
F
FisherGirl
5/16/2022 10:36:00 PM

the interactive nature of the test engine application makes the preparation process less boring.

NETHERLANDS
C
Chiranthaka
9/20/2023 11:15:00 AM

very useful.

Anonymous
S
SK
7/15/2023 3:51:00 AM

complete question dump should be made available for practice.

Anonymous
G
Gamerrr420
5/25/2022 9:38:00 PM

i just passed my first exam. i got 2 exam dumps as part of the 50% sale. my second exam is under work. once i write that exam i report my result. but so far i am confident.

AUSTRALIA
K
Kudu hgeur
9/21/2023 5:58:00 PM

nice create dewey stefen

CZECH REPUBLIC
A
Anorag
9/6/2023 9:24:00 AM

i just wrote this exam and it is still valid. the questions are exactly the same but there are about 4 or 5 questions that are answered incorrectly. so watch out for those. best of luck with your exam.

CANADA
N
Nathan
1/10/2023 3:54:00 PM

passed my exam today. this is a good start to 2023.

UNITED STATES
1
1
10/28/2023 7:32:00 AM

great sharing

Anonymous
A
Anand
1/20/2024 10:36:00 AM

very helpful

UNITED STATES
K
Kumar
6/23/2023 1:07:00 PM

thanks.. very helpful

FRANCE
U
User random
11/15/2023 3:01:00 AM

i registered for 1z0-1047-23 but dumps qre available for 1z0-1047-22. help me with this...

UNITED STATES
K
kk
1/17/2024 3:00:00 PM

very helpful

UNITED STATES
R
Raj
7/24/2023 10:20:00 AM

please upload oracle 1z0-1110-22 exam pdf

INDIA
B
Blessious Phiri
8/13/2023 11:58:00 AM

becoming interesting on the logical part of the cdbs and pdbs

Anonymous
L
LOL what a joke
9/10/2023 9:09:00 AM

some of the answers are incorrect, i would be wary of using this until an admin goes back and reviews all the answers

UNITED STATES
M
Muhammad Rawish Siddiqui
12/9/2023 7:40:00 AM

question # 267: federated operating model is also correct.

SAUDI ARABIA
M
Mayar
9/22/2023 4:58:00 AM

its helpful alot.

Anonymous
S
Sandeep
7/25/2022 11:58:00 PM

the questiosn from this braindumps are same as in the real exam. my passing mark was 84%.

INDIA
E
Eman Sawalha
6/10/2023 6:09:00 AM

it is an exam that measures your understanding of cloud computing resources provided by aws. these resources are aligned under 6 categories: storage, compute, database, infrastructure, pricing and network. with all of the services and typees of services under each category

GREECE
M
Mars
11/16/2023 1:53:00 AM

good and very useful

TAIWAN PROVINCE OF CHINA
R
ronaldo7
10/24/2023 5:34:00 AM

i cleared the az-104 exam by scoring 930/1000 on the exam. it was all possible due to this platform as it provides premium quality service. thank you!

UNITED STATES
P
Palash Ghosh
9/11/2023 8:30:00 AM

easy questions

Anonymous
N
Noor
10/2/2023 7:48:00 AM

could you please upload ad0-127 dumps

INDIA
K
Kotesh
7/27/2023 2:30:00 AM

good content

Anonymous
AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!