Amazon
Avaya
Cisco
CompTIA
CrowdStrike
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
Google
ISC
ISC2
ITIL
Juniper
Microsoft
NVIDIA
Okta
Palo Alto Networks
Salesforce
SAP
ServiceNow
All Vendors
  1. Home
  2. PECB
  3. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer

PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Questions in PDF

Free PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Dumps Questions (page: 2)

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer PDF — 215 Questions

HealthGenic is a Swedish pharmaceutical company that specializes in developing human therapeutics. The development process of human therapeutics requires analyzing the medical history of many patients. As the company handles sensitive information of millions of patients, an information security management system (ISMS) was critical to ensure the protection of their assets and improve their information security.
HealthGenic has had an ISMS in place for the past two years. Once the ISMS was implemented, HealthGenic changed its approach from correcting to preventing information security incidents. Since no issues were faced during the last two years, the top management of HealthGenic decided not to conduct a management review, nor did they appoint a team to perform the internal audits as planned. In addition, the IT team totally neglected the regular monitoring and measurement and performance evaluation processes.
Just before the recertification audit, the company asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years. This left the production sector with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Emma, HealthGenic's information security officer, was assigned by the top management to conduct the internal audit. As an employee of the company, Emma had access to all offices and documentation of HealthGenic. With hundreds of report pages written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever. Emma concluded that HealthGenic must have a better plan on monitoring the progress of their ISMS. In addition, she concluded that monitoring and measurement, performance evaluation, and management reviews should be conducted at planned intervals. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
What caused HealthGenic's workforce disruption?

  1. The voluminous written reports and neglecting of the internal audit and monitoring and measurement at planned intervals
  2. The inconsistency of reports written by different employees
  3. The appointment of Emma as the internal auditor

Answer(s): A




HealthGenic is a Swedish pharmaceutical company that specializes in developing human therapeutics. The development process of human therapeutics requires analyzing the medical history of many patients. As the company handles sensitive information of millions of patients, an information security management system (ISMS) was critical to ensure the protection of their assets and improve their information security.
HealthGenic has had an ISMS in place for the past two years. Once the ISMS was implemented, HealthGenic changed its approach from correcting to preventing information security incidents. Since no issues were faced during the last two years, the top management of HealthGenic decided not to conduct a management review, nor did they appoint a team to perform the internal audits as planned. In addition, the IT team totally neglected the regular monitoring and measurement and performance evaluation processes.
Just before the recertification audit, the company asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years. This left the production sector with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Emma, HealthGenic's information security officer, was assigned by the top management to conduct the internal audit. As an employee of the company, Emma had access to all offices and documentation of HealthGenic. With hundreds of report pages written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever. Emma concluded that HealthGenic must have a better plan on monitoring the progress of their ISMS. In addition, she concluded that monitoring and measurement, performance evaluation, and management reviews should be conducted at planned intervals. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations.

Based on scenario 16, did the nonconformity report include all the necessary aspects?

  1. Yes, the report included all the necessary aspects
  2. No, the report must also specify the root cause of the nonconformity
  3. No, the report must also specify the audit criteria

Answer(s): B




HealthGenic is a Swedish pharmaceutical company that specializes in developing human therapeutics. The development process of human therapeutics requires analyzing the medical history of many patients. As the company handles sensitive information of millions of patients, an information security management system (ISMS) was critical to ensure the protection of their assets and improve their information security.
HealthGenic has had an ISMS in place for the past two years. Once the ISMS was implemented, HealthGenic changed its approach from correcting to preventing information security incidents. Since no issues were faced during the last two years, the top management of HealthGenic decided not to conduct a management review, nor did they appoint a team to perform the internal audits as planned. In addition, the IT team totally neglected the regular monitoring and measurement and performance evaluation processes.
Just before the recertification audit, the company asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years. This left the production sector with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Emma, HealthGenic's information security officer, was assigned by the top management to conduct the internal audit. As an employee of the company, Emma had access to all offices and documentation of HealthGenic. With hundreds of report pages written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever. Emma concluded that HealthGenic must have a better plan on monitoring the progress of their ISMS. In addition, she concluded that monitoring and measurement, performance evaluation, and management reviews should be conducted at planned intervals. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations.

Based on scenario 16, how does the HealthGenic's negligence affect the ISMS certificate?

  1. HealthGenic will be able to renew the ISMS certificate, as they did not detect any information security incident in the past two years
  2. HealthGenic might not be able to renew the ISMS certificate, as it has not conducted management reviews at planned intervals
  3. HealthGenic might not be able to renew the ISMS certificate, as the internal audit lasted longer than planned

Answer(s): B




HealthGenic is a Swedish pharmaceutical company that specializes in developing human therapeutics. The development process of human therapeutics requires analyzing the medical history of many patients. As the company handles sensitive information of millions of patients, an information security management system (ISMS) was critical to ensure the protection of their assets and improve their information security.
HealthGenic has had an ISMS in place for the past two years. Once the ISMS was implemented, HealthGenic changed its approach from correcting to preventing information security incidents. Since no issues were faced during the last two years, the top management of HealthGenic decided not to conduct a management review, nor did they appoint a team to perform the internal audits as planned. In addition, the IT team totally neglected the regular monitoring and measurement and performance evaluation processes.
Just before the recertification audit, the company asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years. This left the production sector with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Emma, HealthGenic's information security officer, was assigned by the top management to conduct the internal audit. As an employee of the company, Emma had access to all offices and documentation of HealthGenic. With hundreds of report pages written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever. Emma concluded that HealthGenic must have a better plan on monitoring the progress of their ISMS. In addition, she concluded that monitoring and measurement, performance evaluation, and management reviews should be conducted at planned intervals. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations.

Does HealthGenic comply with the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001 regarding the monitoring and measurement process? Refer to scenario 16.

  1. Yes, because the standard does not indicate when the monitoring and measurement should be performed
  2. Yes, because the standard indicates that the monitoring and measurement must be conducted every two years
  3. No, because even though the standard does not imply when such a process should be performed, the company must have a monitoring and measurement process in place

Answer(s): A




HealthGenic is a Swedish pharmaceutical company that specializes in developing human therapeutics. The development process of human therapeutics requires analyzing the medical history of many patients. As the company handles sensitive information of millions of patients, an information security management system (ISMS) was critical to ensure the protection of their assets and improve their information security.
HealthGenic has had an ISMS in place for the past two years. Once the ISMS was implemented, HealthGenic changed its approach from correcting to preventing information security incidents. Since no issues were faced during the last two years, the top management of HealthGenic decided not to conduct a management review, nor did they appoint a team to perform the internal audits as planned. In addition, the IT team totally neglected the regular monitoring and measurement and performance evaluation processes.
Just before the recertification audit, the company asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years. This left the production sector with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Emma, HealthGenic's information security officer, was assigned by the top management to conduct the internal audit. As an employee of the company, Emma had access to all offices and documentation of HealthGenic. With hundreds of report pages written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever. Emma concluded that HealthGenic must have a better plan on monitoring the progress of their ISMS. In addition, she concluded that monitoring and measurement, performance evaluation, and management reviews should be conducted at planned intervals. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations.

Which situation presented in scenario 16 is not in compliance with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements?

  1. Emma has an operational role in the HealthGenic's management system
  2. The recertification audit is planned to be conducted two years after HealthGenic implemented the ISMS
  3. Emma had access to all offices and documentation of HealthGenic

Answer(s): A



Viewing page 2 of 28

Share your comments for PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam with other users:

A
Anonymous
12/27/2023 12:47:00 AM

answer to this question "what administrative safeguards should be implemented to protect the collected data while in use by manasa and her product management team? " it should be (c) for the following reasons: this administrative safeguard involves controlling access to collected data by ensuring that only individuals who need the data for their job responsibilities have access to it. this helps minimize the risk of unauthorized access and potential misuse of sensitive information. while other options such as (a) documenting data flows and (b) conducting a privacy impact assessment (pia) are important steps in data protection, implementing a "need to know" access policy directly addresses the issue of protecting data while in use by limiting access to those who require it for legitimate purposes. (d) is not directly related to safeguarding data during use; it focuses on data transfers and location.

INDIA
J
Japles
5/23/2023 9:46:00 PM

password lockout being the correct answer for question 37 does not make sense. it should be geofencing.

Anonymous
F
Faritha
8/10/2023 6:00:00 PM

for question 4, the righr answer is :recover automatically from failures

UNITED STATES
A
Anonymous
9/14/2023 4:27:00 AM

question number 4s answer is 3, option c. i

UNITED STATES
P
p das
12/7/2023 11:41:00 PM

very good questions

UNITED STATES
A
Anna
1/5/2024 1:12:00 AM

i am confused about the answers to the questions. are the answers correct?

KOREA REPUBLIC OF
B
Bhavya
9/13/2023 10:15:00 AM

very usefull

Anonymous
R
Rahul Kumar
8/31/2023 12:30:00 PM

need certification.

CANADA
D
Diran Ole
9/17/2023 5:15:00 PM

great exam prep

CANADA
V
Venkata Subbarao Bandaru
6/24/2023 8:45:00 AM

i require dump

Anonymous
D
D
7/15/2023 1:38:00 AM

good morning, could you please upload this exam again,

Anonymous
A
Ann
9/15/2023 5:39:00 PM

hi can you please upload the dumps for sap contingent module. thanks

AUSTRALIA
S
Sridhar
1/16/2024 9:19:00 PM

good questions

Anonymous
S
Summer
10/4/2023 9:57:00 PM

looking forward to the real exam

Anonymous
V
vv
12/2/2023 2:45:00 PM

good ones for exam preparation

UNITED STATES
D
Danny Zas
9/15/2023 4:45:00 AM

this is a good experience

UNITED STATES
S
SM 1211
10/12/2023 10:06:00 PM

hi everyone

UNITED STATES
A
A
10/2/2023 6:08:00 PM

waiting for the dump. please upload.

UNITED STATES
A
Anonymous
7/16/2023 11:05:00 AM

upload cks exam questions

Anonymous
J
Johan
12/13/2023 8:16:00 AM

awesome training material

NETHERLANDS
P
PC
7/28/2023 3:49:00 PM

where is dump

Anonymous
Y
YoloStar Yoloing
10/22/2023 9:58:00 PM

q. 289 - the correct answer should be b not d, since the question asks for the most secure way to provide access to a s3 bucket (a single one), and by principle of the least privilege you should not be giving access to all buckets.

Anonymous
Z
Zelalem Nega
5/14/2023 12:45:00 PM

please i need if possible h12-831,

UNITED KINGDOM
U
unknown-R
11/23/2023 7:36:00 AM

good collection of questions and solution for pl500 certification

UNITED STATES
S
Swaminathan
5/11/2023 9:59:00 AM

i would like to appear the exam.

Anonymous
V
Veenu
10/24/2023 6:26:00 AM

i am very happy as i cleared my comptia a+ 220-1101 exam. i studied from as it has all exam dumps and mock tests available. i got 91% on the test.

Anonymous
K
Karan
5/17/2023 4:26:00 AM

need this dump

Anonymous
R
Ramesh Kutumbaka
12/30/2023 11:17:00 PM

its really good to eventuate knowledge before appearing for the actual exam.

Anonymous
A
anonymous
7/20/2023 10:31:00 PM

this is great

CANADA
X
Xenofon
6/26/2023 9:35:00 AM

please i want the questions to pass the exam

UNITED STATES
D
Diego
1/21/2024 8:21:00 PM

i need to pass exam

Anonymous
V
Vichhai
12/25/2023 3:25:00 AM

great, i appreciate it.

AUSTRALIA
P
P Simon
8/25/2023 2:39:00 AM

please could you upload (isc)2 certified in cybersecurity (cc) exam questions

SOUTH AFRICA
K
Karim
10/8/2023 8:34:00 PM

good questions, wrong answers

Anonymous
AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!