PECB ISO 22301 Lead Implementer Certification ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer Dumps in PDF

Free PECB ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer Real Questions (page: 3)

Scenario 3: Socket Inc. is a telecommunications company offering mainly wireless products and services. It uses MongoDB, a document model database that offers high availability, scalability, and flexibility.
Last month, Socket Inc. reported an information security incident. A group of hackers compromised its MongoDB database, because the database administrators did not change its default settings, leaving it without a password and publicly accessible.
Fortunately, Socket Inc. performed regular information backups in their MongoDB database, so no information was lost during the incident. In addition, a syslog server allowed Socket Inc. to centralize all logs in one server. The company found out that no persistent backdoor was placed and that the attack was not initiated from an employee inside the company by reviewing the event logs that record user faults and exceptions.
To prevent similar incidents in the future, Socket Inc. decided to use an access control system that grants access to authorized personnel only. The company also implemented a control in order to define and implement rules for the effective use of cryptography, including cryptographic key management, to protect the database from unauthorized access. The implementation was based on all relevant agreements, legislation, and regulations, and the information classification scheme. To improve security and reduce the administrative efforts, network segregation using VPNs was proposed.
Lastly, Socket Inc. implemented a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information related to information security threats, and integrate information security into project management.
Socket Inc. has implemented a control for the effective use of cryptography and cryptographic key management. Is this compliant with ISO/IEC 27001? Refer to scenario 3.

  1. No, the control should be implemented only for defining rules for cryptographic key management
  2. Yes, the control for the effective use of the cryptography can include cryptographic key management
  3. No, because the standard provides a separate control for cryptographic key management

Answer(s): B



Scenario 3: Socket Inc. is a telecommunications company offering mainly wireless products and services. It uses MongoDB, a document model database that offers high availability, scalability, and flexibility.
Last month, Socket Inc. reported an information security incident. A group of hackers compromised its MongoDB database, because the database administrators did not change its default settings, leaving it without a password and publicly accessible.
Fortunately, Socket Inc. performed regular information backups in their MongoDB database, so no information was lost during the incident. In addition, a syslog server allowed Socket Inc. to centralize all logs in one server. The company found out that no persistent backdoor was placed and that the attack was not initiated from an employee inside the company by reviewing the event logs that record user faults and exceptions.
To prevent similar incidents in the future, Socket Inc. decided to use an access control system that grants access to authorized personnel only. The company also implemented a control in order to define and implement rules for the effective use of cryptography, including cryptographic key management, to protect the database from unauthorized access. The implementation was based on all relevant agreements, legislation, and regulations, and the information classification scheme. To improve security and reduce the administrative efforts, network segregation using VPNs was proposed.
Lastly, Socket Inc. implemented a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information related to information security threats, and integrate information security into project management.
Can Socket Inc. find out that no persistent backdoor was placed and that the attack was initiated from an employee inside the company by reviewing event logs that record user faults and exceptions? Refer to scenario 3.

  1. Yes, Socket Inc. can find out that no persistent backdoor was placed by only reviewing user faults and exceptions logs
  2. No, Socket Inc. should also have reviewed event logs that record user activities
  3. No, Socket Inc. should have reviewed all the logs on the syslog server

Answer(s): B



Scenario 3: Socket Inc. is a telecommunications company offering mainly wireless products and services. It uses MongoDB, a document model database that offers high availability, scalability, and flexibility.
Last month, Socket Inc. reported an information security incident. A group of hackers compromised its MongoDB database, because the database administrators did not change its default settings, leaving it without a password and publicly accessible.
Fortunately, Socket Inc. performed regular information backups in their MongoDB database, so no information was lost during the incident. In addition, a syslog server allowed Socket Inc. to centralize all logs in one server. The company found out that no persistent backdoor was placed and that the attack was not initiated from an employee inside the company by reviewing the event logs that record user faults and exceptions.
To prevent similar incidents in the future, Socket Inc. decided to use an access control system that grants access to authorized personnel only. The company also implemented a control in order to define and implement rules for the effective use of cryptography, including cryptographic key management, to protect the database from unauthorized access. The implementation was based on all relevant agreements, legislation, and regulations, and the information classification scheme. To improve security and reduce the administrative efforts, network segregation using VPNs was proposed.
Lastly, Socket Inc. implemented a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information related to information security threats, and integrate information security into project management.
Based on scenario 3. what would help Socket Inc. address similar information security incidents in the future?

  1. Using the MongoDB database with the default settings
  2. Using cryptographic keys to protect the database from unauthorized access
  3. Using the access control system to ensure that only authorized personnel is granted access

Answer(s): C



Scenario 3: Socket Inc. is a telecommunications company offering mainly wireless products and services. It uses MongoDB, a document model database that offers high availability, scalability, and flexibility.
Last month, Socket Inc. reported an information security incident. A group of hackers compromised its MongoDB database, because the database administrators did not change its default settings, leaving it without a password and publicly accessible.
Fortunately, Socket Inc. performed regular information backups in their MongoDB database, so no information was lost during the incident. In addition, a syslog server allowed Socket Inc. to centralize all logs in one server. The company found out that no persistent backdoor was placed and that the attack was not initiated from an employee inside the company by reviewing the event logs that record user faults and exceptions.
To prevent similar incidents in the future, Socket Inc. decided to use an access control system that grants access to authorized personnel only. The company also implemented a control in order to define and implement rules for the effective use of cryptography, including cryptographic key management, to protect the database from unauthorized access. The implementation was based on all relevant agreements, legislation, and regulations, and the information classification scheme. To improve security and reduce the administrative efforts, network segregation using VPNs was proposed.
Lastly, Socket Inc. implemented a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information related to information security threats, and integrate information security into project management.
Based on scenario 3, which information security control of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 did Socket Inc. implement by establishing a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information related to information security threats?

  1. Annex A 5.5 Contact with authorities
  2. Annex A 5.7 Threat Intelligence
  3. Annex A 5.13 Labeling of information

Answer(s): B



An organization documented each security control that it implemented by describing their functions in detail. Is this compliant with ISO/IEC 27001?

  1. No, the standard requires to document only the operation of processes and controls, so no description of each security control is needed
  2. No, because the documented information should have a strict format, including the date, version number and author identification
  3. Yes, but documenting each security control and not the process in general will make it difficult to review the documented information

Answer(s): C



Which security controls must be implemented to comply with ISO/IEC 27001?

  1. Those designed by the organization only
  2. Those included in the risk treatment plan
  3. Those listed in Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001, without any exception

Answer(s): B



What is the main purpose of Annex A 7.1 Physical security perimeters of ISO/IEC 27001?

  1. To prevent unauthorized physical access, damage, and interference to the organization’s information and other associated assets
  2. To maintain the confidentiality of information that is accessible by personnel or external parties
  3. To ensure access to information and other associated assets is defined and authorized

Answer(s): A



An organization wants to enable the correlation and analysis of security-related events and other recorded data and to support investigations into information security incidents.
Which control should it implement?

  1. Use of privileged utility programs
  2. Clock synchronization
  3. Installation of software on operational systems

Answer(s): B



Share your comments for PECB ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer exam with other users:

A
AI Tutor Explanation
8/8/2026 9:47:28 AM

Question 26:
Correct answer: C — No, it is the top management’s responsibility to allocate the resources needed for the BCMS.
The answer key shows A, but this appears incorrect.
Under ISO 22301:

  • Top management must demonstrate leadership and commitment to the BCMS.
  • Top management must determine and provide the resources needed to establish, implement, maintain, and continually improve the BCMS.
  • A project manager such as Rebecca may coordinate or distribute resources as part of implementation, but she does not hold the organization’s ultimate responsibility for ensuring those resources are available.

Therefore, Rebecca can perform operational resource allocation, but the formal ISO 22301 responsibility rests with top management.

AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!