What is the minimum time a newly created Deduplication storage policy takes to apply to the VMs in the container?
Answer(s): C
https://portal.nutanix.com/page/documents/details?targetId=Prism-Central-Guide- vpc_2023_3:mul-cluster-storage-policy-pc-c.html
Refer to the exhibit.An administrator is adding a new node to a cluster. The node has been imaged to the same versions of AHV and AOS that the cluster running, configured with appropriate IP addresses, and br0-up has been configured the same the existing uplink bondsWhen attempting to add the node to the cluster with the Expand Cluster function in Prism , the cluster is unable to find the new node.Based on the above output from the new node, what is most likely the cause of this issue?
Answer(s): B
The correct answer is B. The existing and the expansion node are on different VLANs.The output shows that the new node has a br0-up bond with four interfaces: eth0, eth1, eth2, and eth. The bond is configured with LACP active and LACP fallback set to false. This means that the bond will only work if the upstream switch supports LACP and is configured to form an LACP group with the four interfaces. However, the output also shows that the bond has no IP address assigned to it, which indicates that the bond is not operational. One possible reason for this is that the existing and the expansion node are on different VLANs, and the upstream switch is not configured to allow the VLAN traffic on the LACP group. This would prevent the new node from communicating with the cluster and being discovered by the Expand Cluster function in Prism.To verify this, the administrator can check the VLAN configuration on the upstream switch and compare it with the existing nodes. Alternatively, the administrator can use the "manage_ovs show_uplinks" command on an existing node and compare the output with the new node. If there is a VLAN mismatch, the administrator can either change the VLAN configuration on the switch or on the new node to match the existing nodes.
Multicloud Infrastructure (NCP-MCI) v6.5 - Nutanix
Refer to the exhibit.An administrator is trying to implement the solution that is shown in the exhibit, but has been unsuccessful.Based on the diagram, what is causing the issue?
The correct answer is C. Network latency.The diagram shows a solution that uses synchronous replication between two remote protection domains, cluster site A and cluster site B. Synchronous replication is a feature that allows near-zero RPO (recovery point objective) by replicating data to the remote site before acknowledging writes to the local site. However, synchronous replication has some requirements and limitations that must be met for it to work properly. One of these requirements is that the network latency between the two sites must be less than or equal to 5 ms. If the network latency is higher than 5 ms, the synchronous replication will fail and the protection policy will be suspended.Therefore, based on the diagram, the most likely cause of the issue is that the network latency between cluster site A and cluster site B is higher than 5 ms, which prevents the synchronous replication from working. To verify this, the administrator can use the "ncli cluster ping" command to measure the network latency between the two sites. If the network latency is indeed higher than 5 ms, the administrator can either improve the network performance or switch to a different replication mode, such as near-synchronous or asynchronous.
Synchronous Replication Requirements
The administrator recently had a node fail in an AHV Nutanix cluster. All of the VMs restarted on other nodes in the cluster, but they discovered that the VMs that make up a SQL cluster were running on the failed host. The administrator has been asked to take measures to prevent a SQL outage in the future.What affinity option will prevent the SQL VMs from running on the same hos?
Answer(s): A
Answer(s): A. VM-VM anti-Affinity policyA VM-VM anti-Affinity policy is a rule that ensures that two or more VMs don't run on the same AHV host. It's useful when an application provides HA and an AHV host can't be an application's single point of failure. In this case, the SQL cluster VMs should have a VM-VM anti-Affinity policy configured to prevent them from running on the same host and causing an outage if that host fails. A VM-VM anti-Affinity policy can be created using the aCLI commands. The other options are not relevant for this scenario.
1: Affinity Policies - Nutanix Support & Insights 2: Affinity Policies Help | Nutanix Community
After logging into Prism Element, an administrator presses the letter A on the Keyboard.What is the expected outcome of this input?
Answer(s): D
API Explorer page will launch when an administrator presses the letter A on the keyboard after logging into Prism Element. This is one of the keyboard shortcuts that Prism Element provides for accessibility and ease of use. API Explorer is a tool that allows users to explore and test Nutanix REST APIs within Prism Element.https://www.nutanixbible.com/3b-book-of-prism-navigation.html
Share your comments for Nutanix NCP-MCI exam with other users:
so far it is good
please provide me the dump
i failed the cisa exam today. but i have found all the questions that were on the exam to be on this site.
in question 272 the right answer states that an autonomous acces point is "configured and managed by the wlc" but this is not what i have learned in my ccna course. is this a mistake? i understand that lightweight aps are managed by wlc while autonomous work as standalones on the wlan.
it was helpful
good question
really nice
please i need dumps for isc2 cybersecuity
ans is coldline i think
very helpful
can you please provide dumps so that it helps me more
thank you for providing me with the updated question and answers. this version has all the questions from the exam. i just saw them in my exam this morning. i passed my exam today.
how i can see exam questions?
can you please upload please?
question 75: option c is correct answer
please add this exam
please upoad
has anyone recently attended safe 6.0 certification? is it the samq question from here.
expository experience
52 should be b&c. controller failure has nothing to do with this type of issue. degraded state tells us its a raid issue, and if the os is missing then the bootable device isnt found. the only other consideration could be data loss but thats somewhat broad whereas b&c show understanding of the specific issues the question is asking about.
great help!!!
very useful tools
looks a good platform to prepare az-104
want to pass the exam
good resource
question 11 : d
only the free dumps will be enough for pass, or have to purchase the premium one. please suggest.
good questions. thanks.
good for practice.
great case study
the questions in this exam dumps is valid. i passed my test last monday. i only whish they had their pricing in inr instead of usd. but it is still worth it.
q40 the answer is not d, why are you giving incorrect answers? snapshot consolidation is used to merge the snapshot delta disk files to the vm base disk
thanks, very relevant
wrong answer. it is true not false.