What is a key requirement when using an external Identity Provider for Client Management in Anypoint Platform?
Answer(s): C
https://www.folkstalk.com/2019/11/mulesoft-integration-and-platform.htmlCorrect Answer: To invoke OAuth 2.0-protected APIs managed by Anypoint Platform, API clients must submit access tokens issued by that same Identity Provider *****************************************>> It is NOT necessary that single sign-on is required to sign in to Anypoint Platform because we are using an external Identity Provider for Client Management >> It is NOT necessary that all APIs managed by Anypoint Platform must be protected by SAML 2.0 policies because we are using an external Identity Provider for Client Management >> Not TRUE that the application network must include System APIs that interact with the Identity Provider because we are using an external Identity Provider for Client Management Only TRUE statement in the given options is - "To invoke OAuth 2.0-protected APIs managed by Anypoint Platform, API clients must submit access tokens issued by that same Identity Provider"
https://docs.mulesoft.com/api-manager/2.x/external-oauth-2.0-token-validation-policy https://blogs.mulesoft.com/dev/api-dev/api-security-ways-to-authenticate-and-authorize/
The responses to some HTTP requests can be cached depending on the HTTP verb used in the request. According to the HTTP specification, for what HTTP verbs is this safe to do?
Answer(s): D
Correct Answer: GET, OPTIONS, HEAD
http://restcookbook.com/HTTP%20Methods/idempotency/
What is the most performant out-of-the-box solution in Anypoint Platform to track transaction state in an asynchronously executing long-running process implemented as a Mule application deployed to multiple CloudHub workers?
Correct Answer: Persistent Object Store*****************************************>> Redis distributed cache is performant but NOT out-of-the-box solution in Anypoint Platform >> File-storage is neither performant nor out-of-the-box solution in Anypoint Platform >> java.util.WeakHashMap needs a completely custom implementation of cache from scratch using Java code and is limited to the JVM where it is running. Which means the state in the cache is not worker aware when running on multiple workers. This type of cache is local to the worker. So, this is neither out-of-the-box nor worker-aware among multiple workers on cloudhub.https://www.baeldung.com/java-weakhashmap>> Persistent Object Store is an out-of-the-box solution provided by Anypoint Platform which is performant as well as worker aware among multiple workers running on CloudHub.https://docs.mulesoft.com/object-store/So, Persistent Object Store is the right answer.
How can the application of a rate limiting API policy be accurately reflected in the RAML definition of an API?
Correct Answer: By refining the response definitions by adding the x-ratelimit-* response headers with description, type, and example*****************************************
https://docs.mulesoft.com/api-manager/2.x/rate-limiting-and-throttling#response-headers https://docs.mulesoft.com/api-manager/2.x/rate-limiting-and-throttling-sla-based- policies#response-headers
An organization has several APIs that accept JSON data over HTTP POST. The APIs are all publicly available and are associated with several mobile applications and web applications. The organization does NOT want to use any authentication or compliance policies for these APIs, but at the same time, is worried that some bad actor could send payloads that could somehow compromise the applications or servers running the API implementations. What out-of-the-box Anypoint Platform policy can address exposure to this threat?
Correct Answer: Apply a JSON threat protection policy to all APIs to detect potential threat vectors*****************************************>> Usually, if the APIs are designed and developed for specific consumers (known consumers/customers) then we would IP Whitelist the same to ensure that traffic only comes from them.>> However, as this scenario states that the APIs are publicly available and being used by so many mobile and web applications, it is NOT possible to identify and blacklist all possible bad actors.>> So, JSON threat protection policy is the best chance to prevent any bad JSON payloads from such bad actors.
Share your comments for MuleSoft MCPA-LEVEL-1-MAINTENANCE exam with other users:
q35 should be a
sap c_ts450_2021
nice questions
ecellent materil for unserstanding
good so far
this is way too informative
very helpfull
q.189 - answers are incorrect.
awesome job in getting these questions
i cant find aws certified practitioner clf-c01 exam in aws website but i found aws certified practitioner clf-c02 exam. can everyone please verify the difference between the two clf-c01 and clf-c02? thank you
grazie mille. i got a satisfactory mark in my exam test today because of this exam dumps. sorry for my english.
some of the answers are incorrect. need to be reviewed.
so far so good
i am really liking it
thanks good stuff
need dump c_tadm_23
next time i will write a full review
first time using this site
please sent me oracle 1z0-1105-22 pdf
very helpful
good info about oml
very useful to practice
this website is very helpful.
good content
so challenging
17 should be d ,for morequery its scale out
nice question
yes.
good mateial
good practice exam
impressivre qustion
questions seem helpful
question 21 answer is alerts
Keeping this site free takes real effort. We constantly battle automated scraping and unauthorized content copying. A quick account helps us protect the community and keep the site free.
To continue studying for your MCPA-LEVEL-1-MAINTENANCE, please sign in or create a free account.