LSAC LSAT Section 1: Logical Reasoning LSAT SECTION 1: LOGICAL REASONING Dumps in PDF

Free LSAC LSAT SECTION 1: LOGICAL REASONING Real Questions (page: 4)

Forty years ago, hardly anybody thought about going to court to sue somebody. A person could bump a pedestrian with his Chrysler Airflow and the victim would say something like, "No harm done," and walk away. Ipso facto. No filing of codicils, taking of depositions or polling the jury. Attorneys need not apply.
Which one of the following sentences most logically continues the above passage?

  1. The Chrysler Airflow is no longer the harmless machine it used to be.
  2. Fortunately, this is still the case.
  3. Unfortunately, times have changed.
  4. New legislation affecting the necessity for codicils is a sign of the times.
  5. But now, as we know, law schools are full of eager young people.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

The passage consistently implies a difference between the past and the present, and option [Unfortunately, times have changed.] makes this contrast explicit. Option [Fortunately, this is still the case...] contradicts the implication of the passage, while options [The Chrysler Airflow is no longer the...] and [New legislation affecting the necessity...] narrow the focus unnecessarily, and [But now, as we know, law schools are full of...] is irrelevant.



Forty years ago, hardly anybody thought about going to court to sue somebody. A person could bump a pedestrian with his Chrysler Airflow and the victim would say something like, "No harm done," and walk away. Ipso facto. No filing of codicils, taking of depositions or polling the jury. Attorneys need not apply.

Which one of the following details, if true, would most strengthen the above statement?

  1. There were fewer courthouses then than now.
  2. The marked increase in pedestrian accidents is a relatively recent occurrence.
  3. Most citizens of 40 years ago were not familiar with their legal rights.
  4. The number of lawsuits filed during World War II was extremely low.
  5. Most young attorneys were in the armed forces 40 years ago.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

This fact would strengthen the merely impressionistic evidence that lawsuits were less prevalent 40 years ago.
It is the only choice dealing directly with the implied subject of the passage - lawsuits.



Tom is test driving a blue car. After driving for a short while he comes to the following conclusion: Since this car is blue, it must not accelerate quickly.
The foregoing conclusion can be properly drawn if it is also known that

  1. all red cars accelerate quickly
  2. there are some slow blue cars
  3. all blue cars may not accelerate slowly
  4. all cars that accelerate quickly are red
  5. all slow cars are red

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

The given statement tells us only that the car is blue. For us to be assured that it is slow we must know either that every blue car is slow or that no blue car accelerates quickly. Option [all cars that accelerate quickly are red] restricts quick acceleration to red cars.



In 1975, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the federal government has exclusive rights to any oil and gas resources on the Atlantic Outer Shelf beyond the three-mile limit.
Which one of the following must be true in order for this ruling to be logical?

  1. The U.S. Supreme Court has met recently.
  2. The Atlantic Outer Shelf may possibly contain oil and gas resources.
  3. No oil and gas resources exist within the three-mile limit.
  4. In 1977, the Court reversed this ruling.
  5. Oil and gas on the Atlantic Shelf has not been explored for in the past three years.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

A ruling on resources must at least presume the possibility that such resources exist; otherwise it is absurd. All other choices are irrelevant to the ruling.



By passing more and more regulations allegedly to protect the environment, the state is driving the manufacturing industry away. And when the employers leave, the workers will follow. The number of new no growth or environmental rules passed each year is increasing by leaps and bounds. Rich environmentalists who think they are sympathetic to workers have no real sympathy for the blue-collar employees are injured by their activities.
One major manufacturer has been fined for failing to establish a car-pool plan. Another is accused of polluting the air with industrial emissions, although everyone knows that two thirds of the pollutants come from cars and trucks. No wonder the large manufacturers are moving to states with fewer restrictive laws. And as the manufacturers go, unemployment and the number of workers leaving the state will rise more rapidly than ever before.

The author's argument that strict environmental laws will eventually lead to loss of workers in the state will be most weakened if it can be shown that

  1. so far, the number of manufacturers who have left the state is small
  2. the unemployment rate has climbed steadily in the last three years
  3. the unemployment rate has climbed steadily in the last three years
  4. most workers who leave the state give as their reason for leaving poor environmental quality
  5. several other manufacturing states have strict environmental laws
  6. rich environmentalists are more powerful in many other states

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

The passage argues that environmental restrictions will lead to losses of jobs and hence workers, but if workers are already leaving because the environmental quality is poor, the argument is seriously weakened.



By passing more and more regulations allegedly to protect the environment, the state is driving the manufacturing industry away. And when the employers leave, the workers will follow. The number of new no growth or environmental rules passed each year is increasing by leaps and bounds. Rich environmentalists who think they are sympathetic to workers have no real sympathy for the blue-collar employees are injured by their activities.

One major manufacturer has been fined for failing to establish a car-pool plan. Another is accused of polluting the air with industrial emissions, although everyone knows that two thirds of the pollutants come from cars and trucks. No wonder the large manufacturers are moving to states with fewer restrictive laws. And as the manufacturers go, unemployment and the number of workers leaving the state will rise more rapidly than ever before.
Which one of the following is NOT an argument of this passage?

  1. Environmentalists are responsible for depriving workers of their jobs.
  2. When workers leave a state, it is a sign that manufacturers will follow.
  3. A car-pool law should not be enforced, as cars and trucks are responsible for most air pollution.
  4. Large manufacturers prefer states with fewer restrictions.
  5. A rise in unemployment will lead to an increase in workers leaving the state.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

The passage makes no comment on workers leaving before a manufacturer. It argues that the loss of manufacturers leads to a loss of workers [A rise in unemployment will lead to an increase...].



Unlike most graduates of American high schools, all graduates of high schools in Bermuda have completed four years of advanced mathematics.

Which one of the following, if true, would best explain the situation described above?

  1. Math anxiety is higher in the United States than in Bermuda.
  2. There are far more high schools and high school students in the United States than in Bermuda.
  3. More students in America take fulltime jobs without completing high school.
  4. Math programs in American high schools are frequently understaffed.
  5. High Schools in Bermuda require four years of advanced mathematics for graduation.

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

Though choices [Math anxiety is higher in...], [There are far more high schools and...], [More students in America take fulltime...] and [Math programs in American high schools are...] might contribute to increased study of math in Bermuda, option [High Schools in Bermuda require four years of...] leaves no doubt. High schools in Bermuda require four years of advanced math for graduation; high schools in the United States do not.



By refusing to ban smoking in restaurants, the city council has put the financial wellbeing of restaurant owners above the health of the citizens of this city. No doubt, the council would support the restaurants if they decided to use asbestos tablecloths and to barbecue using radioactivity. These devices would be no more risky.

The author of this paragraph makes her case by arguing

  1. from experience
  2. from example
  3. by authority
  4. from observation
  5. from analogy

Answer(s): E

Explanation:

The passage makes its point by analogy, comparing the dangers of smoking to the dangers of asbestos and radioactivity.



Share your comments for LSAC LSAT SECTION 1: LOGICAL REASONING exam with other users:

R
Ronke
8/18/2023 10:39:00 AM

this is simple but tiugh as well

C
CesarPA
7/12/2023 10:36:00 PM

questão 4, segundo meu compilador local e o site https://www.jdoodle.com/online-java-compiler/, a resposta correta é "c" !

J
Jeya
9/13/2023 7:50:00 AM

its very useful

T
Tracy
10/24/2023 6:28:00 AM

i mastered my skills and aced the comptia 220-1102 exam with a score of 920/1000. i give the credit to for my success.

J
James
8/17/2023 4:33:00 PM

real questions

A
Aderonke
10/23/2023 1:07:00 PM

very helpful assessments

S
Simmi
8/24/2023 7:25:00 AM

hi there, i would like to get dumps for this exam

J
johnson
10/24/2023 5:47:00 AM

i studied for the microsoft azure az-204 exam through it has 100% real questions available for practice along with various mock tests. i scored 900/1000.

M
Manas
9/9/2023 1:48:00 AM

please upload 1z0-1072-23 exam dups

S
SB
9/12/2023 5:15:00 AM

i was hoping if you could please share the pdf as i’m currently preparing to give the exam.

J
Jagjit
8/26/2023 5:01:00 PM

i am looking for oracle 1z0-116 exam

S
S Mallik
11/27/2023 12:32:00 AM

where we can get the answer to the questions

P
PiPi Li
12/12/2023 8:32:00 PM

nice questions

D
Dan
8/10/2023 4:19:00 PM

question 129 is completely wrong.

G
gayathiri
7/6/2023 12:10:00 AM

i need dump

D
Deb
8/15/2023 8:28:00 PM

love the site.

M
Michelle
6/23/2023 4:08:00 AM

can you please upload it back?

A
Ajay
10/3/2023 12:17:00 PM

could you please re-upload this exam? thanks a lot!

H
him
9/30/2023 2:38:00 AM

great about shared quiz

S
San
11/14/2023 12:46:00 AM

goood helping

W
Wang
6/9/2022 10:05:00 PM

pay attention to questions. they are very tricky. i waould say about 80 to 85% of the questions are in this exam dump.

M
Mary
5/16/2023 4:50:00 AM

wish you would allow more free questions

T
thomas
9/12/2023 4:28:00 AM

great simulation

S
Sandhya
12/9/2023 12:57:00 AM

very g inood

A
Agathenta
12/16/2023 1:36:00 PM

q35 should be a

M
MD. SAIFUL ISLAM
6/22/2023 5:21:00 AM

sap c_ts450_2021

S
Satya
7/24/2023 3:18:00 AM

nice questions

S
sk
5/13/2023 2:10:00 AM

ecellent materil for unserstanding

G
Gerard
6/29/2023 11:14:00 AM

good so far

L
Limbo
10/9/2023 3:08:00 AM

this is way too informative

T
Tejasree
8/26/2023 1:46:00 AM

very helpfull

Y
Yolostar Again
10/12/2023 3:02:00 PM

q.189 - answers are incorrect.

S
Shikha Bakra
9/10/2023 5:16:00 PM

awesome job in getting these questions

K
Kevin
10/20/2023 2:01:00 AM

i cant find aws certified practitioner clf-c01 exam in aws website but i found aws certified practitioner clf-c02 exam. can everyone please verify the difference between the two clf-c01 and clf-c02? thank you

AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!