ISC SSCP Exam (page: 25)
ISC SSCP System Security Certified Practitioner (SSCP)
Updated on: 16-Feb-2026

Viewing Page 25 of 216

Which access model is most appropriate for companies with a high employee turnover?

  1. Role-based access control
  2. Mandatory access control
  3. Lattice-based access control
  4. Discretionary access control

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The underlying problem for a company with a lot of turnover is assuring that new employees are assigned the correct access permissions and that those permissions are removed when they leave the company.
Selecting the best answer requires one to think about the access control options in the context of a company with a lot of flux in the employee population. RBAC simplifies the task of assigning
permissions because the permissions are assigned to roles which do not change based on who belongs to them. As employees join the company, it is simply a matter of assigning them to the appropriate roles and their permissions derive from their assigned role. They will implicitely inherit the permissions of the role or roles they have been assigned to. When they leave the company or change jobs, their role assignment is revoked/changed appropriately.
Mandatory access control is incorrect. While controlling access based on the clearence level of employees and the sensitivity of obects is a better choice than some of the other incorrect answers, it is not the best choice when RBAC is an option and you are looking for the best solution for a high number of employees constantly leaving or joining the company.
Lattice-based access control is incorrect. The lattice is really a mathematical concept that is used in formally modeling information flow (Bell-Lapadula, Biba, etc). In the context of the question, an abstract model of information flow is not an appropriate choice. CBK, pp. 324-325.
Discretionary access control is incorrect. When an employee joins or leaves the company, the object owner must grant or revoke access for that employee on all the objects they own. Problems would also arise when the owner of an object leaves the company. The complexity of assuring that the permissions are added and removed correctly makes this the least desirable solution in this situation.


Reference:

Alll in One, third edition page 165
RBAC is discussed on pp. 189 through 191 of the ISC(2) guide.



What can be defined as a list of subjects along with their access rights that are authorized to access a specific object?

  1. A capability table
  2. An access control list
  3. An access control matrix
  4. A role-based matrix

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

"It [ACL] specifies a list of users [subjects] who are allowed access to each object" CBK, p. 188
A capability table is incorrect. "Capability tables are used to track, manage and apply controls based on the object and rights, or capabilities of a subject. For example, a table identifies the object, specifies access rights allowed for a subject, and permits access based on the user's posession of a capability (or ticket) for the object." CBK, pp. 191-192. The distinction that makes this an incorrect choice is that access is based on posession of a capability by the subject.
To put it another way, as noted in AIO3 on p. 169, "A capabiltiy table is different from an ACL because the subject is bound to the capability table, whereas the object is bound to the ACL."
An access control matrix is incorrect. The access control matrix is a way of describing the rules for an access control strategy. The matrix lists the users, groups and roles down the left side and the resources and functions across the top. The cells of the matrix can either indicate that access is allowed or indicate the type of access. CBK pp 317 - 318.
AIO3, p. 169 describes it as a table if subjects and objects specifying the access rights a certain subject possesses pertaining to specific objects.
In either case, the matrix is a way of analyzing the access control needed by a population of subjects to a population of objects. This access control can be applied using rules, ACL's, capability tables, etc.
A role-based matrix is incorrect. Again, a matrix of roles vs objects could be used as a tool for thinking about the access control to be applied to a set of objects. The results of the analysis could then be implemented using RBAC.


Reference:

CBK, Domain 2: Access Control.
AIO3, Chapter 4: Access Control



What is the difference between Access Control Lists (ACLs) and Capability Tables?

  1. Access control lists are related/attached to a subject whereas capability tables are related/attached to an object.
  2. Access control lists are related/attached to an object whereas capability tables are related/attached to a subject.
  3. Capability tables are used for objects whereas access control lists are used for users.
  4. They are basically the same.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Capability tables are used to track, manage and apply controls based on the object and rights, or capabilities of a subject. For example, a table identifies the object, specifies access rights allowed for a subject, and permits access based on the user's posession of a capability (or ticket) for the object. It is a row within the matrix.
To put it another way, A capabiltiy table is different from an ACL because the subject is bound to the capability table, whereas the object is bound to the ACL.
CLEMENT NOTE:
If we wish to express this very simply:
Capabilities are attached to a subject and it describe what access the subject has to each of the objects on the row that matches with the subject within the matrix. It is a row within the matrix. ACL's are attached to objects, it describe who has access to the object and what type of access they have. It is a column within the matrix.
The following are incorrect answers:
"Access control lists are subject-based whereas capability tables are object-based" is incorrect. "Capability tables are used for objects whereas access control lists are used for users" is incorrect.
"They are basically the same" is incorrect.
References used for this question:
CBK, pp. 191 - 192
AIO3 p. 169



What can be defined as a table of subjects and objects indicating what actions individual subjects can take upon individual objects?

  1. A capacity table
  2. An access control list
  3. An access control matrix
  4. A capability table

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

The matrix lists the users, groups and roles down the left side and the resources and functions across the top. The cells of the matrix can either indicate that access is allowed or indicate the type of access. CBK pp 317 - 318.
AIO3, p. 169 describes it as a table if subjects and objects specifying the access rights a certain subject possesses pertaining to specific objects.
In either case, the matrix is a way of analyzing the access control needed by a population of subjects to a population of objects. This access control can be applied using rules, ACL's, capability tables, etc.
"A capacity table" is incorrect.
This answer is a trap for the unwary -- it sounds a little like "capability table" but is just there to distract you.
"An access control list" is incorrect.
"It [ACL] specifies a list of users [subjects] who are allowed access to each object" CBK, p. 188 Access control lists (ACL) could be used to implement the rules identified by an access control matrix but is different from the matrix itself.
"A capability table" is incorrect.
"Capability tables are used to track, manage and apply controls based on the object and rights, or capabilities of a subject. For example, a table identifies the object, specifies access rights allowed for a subject, and permits access based on the user's posession of a capability (or ticket) for the object." CBK, pp. 191-192. To put it another way, as noted in AIO3 on p. 169, "A capabiltiy table is different from an ACL because the subject is bound to the capability table, whereas the object is bound to the ACL."
Again, a capability table could be used to implement the rules identified by an access control matrix but is different from the matrix itself.


Reference:

CBK pp. 191-192, 317-318
AIO3, p. 169



Which access control model is best suited in an environment where a high security level is required and where it is desired that only the administrator grants access control?

  1. DAC
  2. MAC
  3. Access control matrix
  4. TACACS

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

MAC provides high security by regulating access based on the clearance of individual users and sensitivity labels for each object. Clearance levels and sensitivity levels cannot be modified by individual users -- for example, user Joe (SECRET clearance) cannot reclassify the "Presidential Doughnut Recipe" from "SECRET" to "CONFIDENTIAL" so that his friend Jane (CONFIDENTIAL clearance) can read it. The administrator is ultimately responsible for configuring this protection in accordance with security policy and directives from the Data Owner.
DAC is incorrect. In DAC, the data owner is responsible for controlling access to the object.
Access control matrix is incorrect. The access control matrix is a way of thinking about the access control needed by a population of subjects to a population of objects. This access control can be applied using rules, ACL's, capability tables, etc.
TACACS is incorrect. TACACS is a tool for performing user authentication.


Reference:

CBK, p. 187, Domain 2: Access Control.
AIO3, Chapter 4, Access Control.



Viewing Page 25 of 216



Share your comments for ISC SSCP exam with other users:

Naveed 8/28/2023 2:48:00 AM

good questions with simple explanation
UNITED STATES


cert 9/24/2023 4:53:00 PM

admin guide (windows) respond to malicious causality chains. when the cortex xdr agent identifies a remote network connection that attempts to perform malicious activity—such as encrypting endpoint files—the agent can automatically block the ip address to close all existing communication and block new connections from this ip address to the endpoint. when cortex xdrblocks an ip address per endpoint, that address remains blocked throughout all agent profiles and policies, including any host-firewall policy rules. you can view the list of all blocked ip addresses per endpoint from the action center, as well as unblock them to re-enable communication as appropriate. this module is supported with cortex xdr agent 7.3.0 and later. select the action mode to take when the cortex xdr agent detects remote malicious causality chains: enabled (default)—terminate connection and block ip address of the remote connection. disabled—do not block remote ip addresses. to allow specific and known s
Anonymous


Yves 8/29/2023 8:46:00 PM

very inciting
Anonymous


Miguel 10/16/2023 11:18:00 AM

question 5, it seems a instead of d, because: - care plan = case - patient = person account - product = product2;
SPAIN


Byset 9/25/2023 12:49:00 AM

it look like real one
Anonymous


Debabrata Das 8/28/2023 8:42:00 AM

i am taking oracle fcc certification test next two days, pls share question dumps
Anonymous


nITA KALE 8/22/2023 1:57:00 AM

i need dumps
Anonymous


CV 9/9/2023 1:54:00 PM

its time to comptia sec+
GREECE


SkepticReader 8/1/2023 8:51:00 AM

question 35 has an answer for a different question. i believe the answer is "a" because it shut off the firewall. "0" in registry data means that its false (aka off).
UNITED STATES


Nabin 10/16/2023 4:58:00 AM

helpful content
MALAYSIA


Blessious Phiri 8/15/2023 3:19:00 PM

oracle 19c is complex db
Anonymous


Sreenivas 10/24/2023 12:59:00 AM

helpful for practice
Anonymous


Liz 9/11/2022 11:27:00 PM

support team is fast and deeply knowledgeable. i appreciate that a lot.
UNITED STATES


Namrata 7/15/2023 2:22:00 AM

helpful questions
Anonymous


lipsa 11/8/2023 12:54:00 PM

thanks for question
Anonymous


Eli 6/18/2023 11:27:00 PM

the software is provided for free so this is a big change. all other sites are charging for that. also that fucking examtopic site that says free is not free at all. you are hit with a pay-wall.
EUROPEAN UNION


open2exam 10/29/2023 1:14:00 PM

i need exam questions nca 6.5 any help please ?
Anonymous


Gerald 9/11/2023 12:22:00 PM

just took the comptia cybersecurity analyst (cysa+) - wished id seeing this before my exam
UNITED STATES


ryo 9/10/2023 2:27:00 PM

very helpful
MEXICO


Jamshed 6/20/2023 4:32:00 AM

i need this exam
PAKISTAN


Roberto Capra 6/14/2023 12:04:00 PM

nice questions... are these questions the same of the exam?
Anonymous


Synt 5/23/2023 9:33:00 PM

need to view
UNITED STATES


Vey 5/27/2023 12:06:00 AM

highly appreciate for your sharing.
CAMBODIA


Tshepang 8/18/2023 4:41:00 AM

kindly share this dump. thank you
Anonymous


Jay 9/26/2023 8:00:00 AM

link plz for download
UNITED STATES


Leo 10/30/2023 1:11:00 PM

data quality oecd
Anonymous


Blessious Phiri 8/13/2023 9:35:00 AM

rman is one good recovery technology
Anonymous


DiligentSam 9/30/2023 10:26:00 AM

need it thx
Anonymous


Vani 8/10/2023 8:11:00 PM

good questions
NEW ZEALAND


Fares 9/11/2023 5:00:00 AM

good one nice revision
Anonymous


Lingaraj 10/26/2023 1:27:00 AM

i love this thank you i need
Anonymous


Muhammad Rawish Siddiqui 12/5/2023 12:38:00 PM

question # 142: data governance is not one of the deliverables in the document and content management context diagram.
SAUDI ARABIA


al 6/7/2023 10:25:00 AM

most answers not correct here
Anonymous


Bano 1/19/2024 2:29:00 AM

what % of questions do we get in the real exam?
UNITED STATES