Test Prep CFA® Level III Chartered Financial Analyst CFA® Level 3 Dumps in PDF

Free Test Prep CFA® Level 3 Real Questions (page: 7)

Hilda Olson covers the chemical industry for Bern Securities. Based on conversations with two executives of InterChem, a major producer of synthetic fabrics, she issues a generalized sector report claiming that "according to a survey of industry executives, rayon feedstocks will be in short supply for at least the next 12 months." In addition, Olson recommends Han Chemical, a major producer of rayon, which has routinely reported higher profits than its competitors and should be well positioned to gain further from reduced supply. In her efforts to learn more about Han Chemical and support her recommendation, Olson scrambles to compile a research report on the firm. She reproduces financial data provided in a research report by Standard & Poor's (S&P) and the Bank of Korea (BOK), the Korean government's central bank. She also obtains two research reports from brokerage firms with operations in Korea, and incorporates portions of the text and charts from these reports into her research report.
Olson describes Han Chemical in her research report as "low risk," even though she knows that the operating risk of the chemical industry is above average and that Han has a higher debt-to-equity ratio than its average competitor. She justifies this to her supervisor by saying that since the market for rayon feedstocks is tight, an investment in Han has a very low risk of suffering a loss in the near term. Olson's supervisor accepts her explanation as valid and the report is issued to the firm's clients.
Shortly after issuing her research report, Olson visited Han Chemical's operations in New Jersey. During her conversation with the firm's vice president of operations, who is also one of Bern's personal trust clients, she was told in confidence that Han Chemical's profit margins are higher than its competitors, partly because they routinely discharge untreated chemical waste into the Delaware River in order to reduce production costs. Such action is a direct violation of U.S. environmental laws.
When Olson returns from her trip to New Jersey, Wolfgang Hundt, director of research at Bern Securities, requests a meeting. Hundt has developed a compliance procedure and has provided relevant written information to employees. Every quarter, he issues written reminders regarding the program to Olson and her peers, so when Olson tells Hundt of Han's chemical dumping, he immediately begins an investigation into the violation.
With regard to the statement concerning rayon feedstocks, Olson has:

  1. not violated CFA Institute Standards.
  2. violated CFA Institute Standards since she has failed to use reasonable judgment in gathering her information.
  3. violated CFA Institute Standards since she is not permitted to project supply and demand conditions in the industry.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Olson has failed to exercise due diligence and form a reasonable basis for her statement regarding rayon feedstocks. She has used information from two executives at one company in the industry to draw conclusions about the overall market. This does not reflect the thoroughness required by Standard V(A) Diligence and Reasonable Basis and thus Olson has violated the Standard. In addition, she may have violated Standard V(B) Communication with Clients and Prospective Clients by failing to distinguish between opinion and fact in her research report. (Study Session 1, LOS I.b)



Hilda Olson covers the chemical industry for Bern Securities. Based on conversations with two executives of InterChem, a major producer of synthetic fabrics, she issues a generalized sector report claiming that "according to a survey of industry executives, rayon feedstocks will be in short supply for at least the next 12 months." In addition, Olson recommends Han Chemical, a major producer of rayon, which has routinely reported higher profits than its competitors and should be well positioned to gain further from reduced supply. In her efforts to learn more about Han Chemical and support her recommendation, Olson scrambles to compile a research report on the firm. She reproduces financial data provided in a research report by Standard & Poor's (S&P) and the Bank of Korea (BOK), the Korean government's central bank. She also obtains two research reports from brokerage firms with operations in Korea, and incorporates portions of the text and charts from these reports into her research report.
Olson describes Han Chemical in her research report as "low risk," even though she knows that the operating risk of the chemical industry is above average and that Han has a higher debt-to-equity ratio than its average competitor. She justifies this to her supervisor by saying that since the market for rayon feedstocks is tight, an investment in Han has a very low risk of suffering a loss in the near term. Olson's supervisor accepts her explanation as valid and the report is issued to the firm's clients.
Shortly after issuing her research report, Olson visited Han Chemical's operations in New Jersey. During her conversation with the firm's vice president of operations, who is also one of Bern's personal trust clients, she was told in confidence that Han Chemical's profit margins are higher than its competitors, partly because they routinely discharge untreated chemical waste into the Delaware River in order to reduce production costs. Such action is a direct violation of U.S. environmental laws.
When Olson returns from her trip to New Jersey, Wolfgang Hundt, director of research at Bern Securities, requests a meeting. Hundt has developed a compliance procedure and has provided relevant written information to employees. Every quarter, he issues written reminders regarding the program to Olson and her peers, so when Olson tells Hundt of Han's chemical dumping, he immediately begins an investigation into the violation.
In her report on Han Chemical, Olson has utilized data from S&P and the BOK. With regard to this data, Olson is allowed to use:

  1. both sources of data, but must acknowledge the sources of the data.
  2. both sources of data, and need not acknowledge the sources of the data.
  3. the S&P data, but not the BOK data, and she must acknowledge the source.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

According to CFA Institute Standard 1(C) Misrepresentation, members and candidates are allowed to utilize factual information and data published by well-known entities that report financial and statistical information or other sources that are similar without providing citations of these sources. Widely published data from S&P and the central bank of the Korean government would fall into this category. (Study Session 1, LOS l.b)



Hilda Olson covers the chemical industry for Bern Securities. Based on conversations with two executives of InterChem, a major producer of synthetic fabrics, she issues a generalized sector report claiming that "according to a survey of industry executives, rayon feedstocks will be in short supply for at least the next 12 months." In addition, Olson recommends Han Chemical, a major producer of rayon, which has routinely reported higher profits than its competitors and should be well positioned to gain further from reduced supply. In her efforts to learn more about Han Chemical and support her recommendation, Olson scrambles to compile a research report on the firm. She reproduces financial data provided in a research report by Standard & Poor's (S&P) and the Bank of Korea (BOK), the Korean government's central bank. She also obtains two research reports from brokerage firms with operations in Korea, and incorporates portions of the text and charts from these reports into her research report.
Olson describes Han Chemical in her research report as "low risk," even though she knows that the operating risk of the chemical industry is above average and that Han has a higher debt-to-equity ratio than its average competitor. She justifies this to her supervisor by saying that since the market for rayon feedstocks is tight, an investment in Han has a very low risk of suffering a loss in the near term. Olson's supervisor accepts her explanation as valid and the report is issued to the firm's clients.
Shortly after issuing her research report, Olson visited Han Chemical's operations in New Jersey. During her conversation with the firm's vice president of operations, who is also one of Bern's personal trust clients, she was told in confidence that Han Chemical's profit margins are higher than its competitors, partly because they routinely discharge untreated chemical waste into the Delaware River in order to reduce production costs. Such action is a direct violation of U.S. environmental laws.
When Olson returns from her trip to New Jersey, Wolfgang Hundt, director of research at Bern Securities, requests a meeting. Hundt has developed a compliance procedure and has provided relevant written information to employees. Every quarter, he issues written reminders regarding the program to Olson and her peers, so when Olson tells Hundt of Han's chemical dumping, he immediately begins an investigation into the violation.
In her report on Han Chemical, Olson has also utilized two brokerage firms' reports. With regard to these sources, Olson is:

  1. allowed to use the text and charts, but must acknowledge the sources.
  2. allowed to use the text and charts, and need not acknowledge the sources.
  3. not allowed to use the text and charts from other reports.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Under CFA Institute Standard 1(C) Misrepresentation, members and candidates are required to acknowledge the sources of information that they incorporate into their own work that do not originate from a recognized financial/statistical reporting service. Therefore, Olson must properly cite the information obtained from the brokerage reports in order to comply with Standard 1(C). (Study Session 1, LOS l.b)



Hilda Olson covers the chemical industry for Bern Securities. Based on conversations with two executives of InterChem, a major producer of synthetic fabrics, she issues a generalized sector report claiming that "according to a survey of industry executives, rayon feedstocks will be in short supply for at least the next 12 months." In addition, Olson recommends Han Chemical, a major producer of rayon, which has routinely reported higher profits than its competitors and should be well positioned to gain further from reduced supply. In her efforts to learn more about Han Chemical and support her recommendation, Olson scrambles to compile a research report on the firm. She reproduces financial data provided in a research report by Standard & Poor's (S&P) and the Bank of Korea (BOK), the Korean government's central bank. She also obtains two research reports from brokerage firms with operations in Korea, and incorporates portions of the text and charts from these reports into her research report.
Olson describes Han Chemical in her research report as "low risk," even though she knows that the operating risk of the chemical industry is above average and that Han has a higher debt-to-equity ratio than its average competitor. She justifies this to her supervisor by saying that since the market for rayon feedstocks is tight, an investment in Han has a very low risk of suffering a loss in the near term. Olson's supervisor accepts her explanation as valid and the report is issued to the firm's clients.
Shortly after issuing her research report, Olson visited Han Chemical's operations in New Jersey. During her conversation with the firm's vice president of operations, who is also one of Bern's personal trust clients, she was told in confidence that Han Chemical's profit margins are higher than its competitors, partly because they routinely discharge untreated chemical waste into the Delaware River in order to reduce production costs. Such action is a direct violation of U.S. environmental laws.
When Olson returns from her trip to New Jersey, Wolfgang Hundt, director of research at Bern Securities, requests a meeting. Hundt has developed a compliance procedure and has provided relevant written information to employees. Every quarter, he issues written reminders regarding the program to Olson and her peers, so when Olson tells Hundt of Han's chemical dumping, he immediately begins an investigation into the violation.

Olson's characterization of the risks associated with an investment in Han Chemical is:

  1. acceptable since it is clearly an opinion.
  2. acceptable since it is supported with facts regarding industry supply and demand.
  3. unacceptable since she has not provided enough information for investors to assess Han's risk.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Olson's report mischaracterizes the level of risk inherent in the investment. As such, this constitutes a violation of Standard V(B) Communication with Clients and Prospective Clients. Olson has also violated Standard 1(C) Misrepresentation by misleading investors as to the true nature of the risk associated with an investment in Han Chemical. (Study Session L, LOS l.b)



Hilda Olson covers the chemical industry for Bern Securities. Based on conversations with two executives of InterChem, a major producer of synthetic fabrics, she issues a generalized sector report claiming that "according to a survey of industry executives, rayon feedstocks will be in short supply for at least the next 12 months." In addition, Olson recommends Han Chemical, a major producer of rayon, which has routinely reported higher profits than its competitors and should be well positioned to gain further from reduced supply. In her efforts to learn more about Han Chemical and support her recommendation, Olson scrambles to compile a research report on the firm. She reproduces financial data provided in a research report by Standard & Poor's (S&P) and the Bank of Korea (BOK), the Korean government's central bank. She also obtains two research reports from brokerage firms with operations in Korea, and incorporates portions of the text and charts from these reports into her research report.
Olson describes Han Chemical in her research report as "low risk," even though she knows that the operating risk of the chemical industry is above average and that Han has a higher debt-to-equity ratio than its average competitor. She justifies this to her supervisor by saying that since the market for rayon feedstocks is tight, an investment in Han has a very low risk of suffering a loss in the near term. Olson's supervisor accepts her explanation as valid and the report is issued to the firm's clients.
Shortly after issuing her research report, Olson visited Han Chemical's operations in New Jersey. During her conversation with the firm's vice president of operations, who is also one of Bern's personal trust clients, she was told in confidence that Han Chemical's profit margins are higher than its competitors, partly because they routinely discharge untreated chemical waste into the Delaware River in order to reduce production costs. Such action is a direct violation of U.S. environmental laws.
When Olson returns from her trip to New Jersey, Wolfgang Hundt, director of research at Bern Securities, requests a meeting. Hundt has developed a compliance procedure and has provided relevant written information to employees. Every quarter, he issues written reminders regarding the program to Olson and her peers, so when Olson tells Hundt of Han's chemical dumping, he immediately begins an investigation into the violation.

With regard to the information Olson received from Han Chemical's Vice President of Operations, the most appropriate course of action for Olson to take would be to:

  1. not divulge such information in her client research since she now lacks independence and objectivity.
  2. divulge the information to her employer because, even though received in confidence, it involves an illegal act.
  3. divulge the information in her client's research department in order to demonstrate due diligence in performing her research.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

In most cases, it would be a violation of CFA Institute Standards to divulge information, which was transmitted in confidence. However, under Standard III(E) Preservation of Confidentiality, an exception is made for information pertaining to an illegal act. Especially since she has issued a research report and buy order for Han, she is compelled under the Standard to divulge such information. She should address the matter with Bern's chief compliance officer as the first step in the process. (Study Session 1, LOS Lb)



Share your comments for Test Prep CFA® Level 3 exam with other users:

S
Sneha
8/17/2023 6:29:00 PM

this is useful

S
sachin
12/27/2023 2:45:00 PM

question 232 answer should be perimeter not netowrk layer. wrong answer selected

T
tomAws
7/18/2023 5:05:00 AM

nice questions

R
Rahul
6/11/2023 2:07:00 AM

hi team, could you please provide this dump ?

T
TeamOraTech
12/5/2023 9:49:00 AM

very helpful to clear the exam and understand the concept.

C
Curtis
7/12/2023 8:20:00 PM

i think it is great that you are helping people when they need it. thanks.

S
sam
7/17/2023 6:22:00 PM

cannot evaluate yet

N
nutz
7/20/2023 1:54:00 AM

a laptops wireless antenna is most likely located in the bezel of the lid

R
rajesh soni
1/17/2024 6:53:00 AM

good examplae to learn basic

T
Tanya
10/25/2023 7:07:00 AM

this is useful information

N
Nasir Mahmood
12/11/2023 7:32:00 AM

looks usefull

J
Jason
9/30/2023 1:07:00 PM

question 81 should be c.

T
TestPD1
8/10/2023 12:22:00 PM

question 18 : response isnt a ?

A
ally
8/19/2023 5:31:00 PM

plaese add questions

D
DIA
10/7/2023 5:59:00 AM

is dumps still valid ?

A
Annie
7/7/2023 8:33:00 AM

thanks for this

A
arnie
9/17/2023 6:38:00 AM

please upload questions

T
Tanuj Rana
7/22/2023 2:33:00 AM

please upload the question dump for professional machinelearning

F
Future practitioner
8/10/2023 1:26:00 PM

question 4 answer is c. this site shows the correct answer as b. "adopt a consumption model" is clearly a cost optimization design principle. looks like im done using this site to study!!!

A
Ace
8/3/2023 10:37:00 AM

number 52 answer is d

N
Nathan
12/17/2023 12:04:00 PM

just started preparing for my exam , and this site is so much help

C
Corey
12/29/2023 5:06:00 PM

question 35 is incorrect, the correct answer is c, it even states so: explanation: when a vm is infected with ransomware, you should not restore the vm to the infected vm. this is because the ransomware will still be present on the vm, and it will encrypt the files again. you should also not restore the vm to any vm within the companys subscription. this is because the ransomware could spread to other vms in the subscription. the best way to restore a vm that is infected with ransomware is to restore it to a new azure vm. this will ensure that the ransomware is not present on the new vm.

R
Rajender
10/18/2023 3:54:00 AM

i would like to take psm1 exam.

B
Blessious Phiri
8/14/2023 9:53:00 AM

cbd and pdb are key to the database

A
Alkaed
10/19/2022 10:41:00 AM

the purchase and download process is very much streamlined. the xengine application is very nice and user-friendly but there is always room for improvement.

D
Dave Gregen
9/4/2023 3:17:00 PM

please upload p_sapea_2023

S
Sarah
6/13/2023 1:42:00 PM

anyone use this? the question dont seem to follow other formats and terminology i have been studying im getting worried

S
Shuv
10/3/2023 8:19:00 AM

good questions

R
Reb974
8/5/2023 1:44:00 AM

hello are these questions valid for ms-102

M
Mchal
7/20/2023 3:38:00 AM

some questions are wrongly answered but its good nonetheless

S
Sonbir
8/8/2023 1:04:00 PM

how to get system serial number using intune

M
Manju
10/19/2023 1:19:00 PM

is it really helpful to pass the exam

L
LeAnne Hair
8/24/2023 12:47:00 PM

#229 in incorrect - all the customers require an annual review

A
Abdul SK
9/28/2023 11:42:00 PM

kindy upload

AI Tutor 👋 I’m here to help!