Scrum SPS Exam (page: 2)
Scrum Scaled Professional
Updated on: 12-Feb-2026

Viewing Page 2 of 9

A Nexus Daily Scrum:
(choose the best two answers)

  1. Provides a single meeting where all Scrum Teams can update the Sprint Backlog.
  2. Is the same as a Scrum-of-Scrums.
  3. Provides input into each Scrum Team's individual Daily Scrums to help them better plan their days work.
  4. Is only for the Nexus Integration Team to plan their work for the next 24-hours.
  5. Is an opportunity to make integration issues transparent.

Answer(s): C,E

Explanation:

The best answers for this question are:
C) Provides input into each Scrum Team's individual Daily Scrums to help them better plan their days work. This answer is correct because the Nexus Daily Scrum is an event that helps the Scrum Teams in a Nexus to coordinate their work and identify any integration issues or dependencies that may affect their progress toward the Nexus Sprint Goal. The appropriate representatives from each Scrum Team attend the Nexus Daily Scrum and share relevant information and feedback that can help their teams plan their work for the next 24 hours 112233.
E) Is an opportunity to make integration issues transparent. This answer is also correct because the Nexus Daily Scrum is an event that enables the Scrum Teams in a Nexus to inspect the current state of the Integrated Increment and to make any integration issues or newly discovered cross-team dependencies transparent. The Nexus Daily Scrum also provides a forum for the Scrum Teams to collaborate and resolve any integration challenges or impediments that may arise during the Sprint 112244.
The other answers are not correct for the following reasons:
A) Provides a single meeting where all Scrum Teams can update the Sprint Backlog. This answer is not accurate because the Nexus Daily Scrum is not a meeting where all Scrum Teams update the Sprint Backlog, but rather an event where appropriate representatives from each Scrum Team inspect the Integrated Increment and identify integration issues or dependencies. The Sprint Backlog is updated by each Scrum Team during their own Daily Scrum, which is a separate event from the Nexus Daily Scrum 1155.
B) Is the same as a Scrum-of-Scrums. This answer is not true because the Nexus Daily Scrum is not the same as a Scrum-of-Scrums, which is a common practice for coordinating multiple Scrum Teams that is not part of the Scrum framework. The Nexus Daily Scrum is a specific event defined by the Nexus framework, which is a minimal extension of Scrum that enables multiple Scrum Teams to work together on a single product. The Nexus Daily Scrum has a clear purpose, structure, and outcome that differs from a Scrum-of-Scrums 112233.
D) Is only for the Nexus Integration Team to plan their work for the next 24-hours. This answer is not correct because the Nexus Daily Scrum is not only for the Nexus Integration Team, but also for the appropriate representatives from each Scrum Team in the Nexus. The Nexus Integration Team is a special Scrum Team that facilitates the integration and delivery of the work done by the other Scrum Teams, but it does not plan the work for them. The Nexus Daily Scrum is an event that helps all the Scrum Teams in the Nexus to coordinate their work and identify any integration issues or dependencies 1155.



Four teams in a Nexus typically integrate their work only once, late in the Sprint. The teams report that it takes many hours or days to integrate their work, which delays the Sprint's end. To address this issue, which of the following would help? (choose the best answer)

  1. Integrating more frequently.
  2. Doing more acceptance testing.
  3. Doing more exploratory testing.
  4. Using Behavior-Driven Development.
  5. Investing in more Requirements Traceability.
  6. All of the above.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The best answer for this question is A. Integrating more frequently. This answer is correct because integrating more frequently can help the Scrum Teams in a Nexus to detect and resolve integration issues or dependencies earlier and faster, and to deliver a potentially releasable product increment at the end of each Sprint. Integrating more frequently can also reduce the complexity and risk of integration, and increase the quality and feedback of value delivery 112233. The other answers are not correct for the following reasons:
B) Doing more acceptance testing. This answer is not sufficient because doing more acceptance testing does not address the root cause of the problem, which is the late integration of the work. Acceptance testing can help to verify the quality and functionality of the product increment, but it does not ensure that the integration is done early and often. Moreover, doing more acceptance testing may consume more time and resources, and delay the delivery of the product increment 44. C) Doing more exploratory testing. This answer is not helpful because doing more exploratory testing does not solve the issue of the late integration of the work. Exploratory testing can help to discover and learn more about the product increment, but it does not guarantee that the integration is done smoothly and quickly. Furthermore, doing more exploratory testing may introduce more uncertainty and variability, and hinder the delivery of the product increment 55. D) Using Behavior-Driven Development. This answer is not relevant because using Behavior-Driven Development does not directly affect the integration of the work. Behavior-Driven Development is a technique that can help to define and communicate the expected behavior and outcomes of the product increment, but it does not ensure that the integration is done frequently and effectively. Additionally, using Behavior-Driven Development may require more collaboration and coordination, and complicate the delivery of the product increment [6]. E) Investing in more Requirements Traceability. This answer is not useful because investing in more Requirements Traceability does not improve the integration of the work. Requirements Traceability is a practice that can help to track and document the origin and evolution of the product requirements, but it does not ensure that the integration is done timely and efficiently. Also, investing in more Requirements Traceability may increase the overhead and bureaucracy, and slow down the delivery of the product increment [7].
F) All of the above. This answer is not correct because none of the above answers are effective for addressing the issue of the late integration of the work. As explained above, each of the above answers has its own limitations and drawbacks, and does not directly or sufficiently help the Scrum Teams in a Nexus to integrate their work more frequently and successfully. Therefore, the best answer is A. Integrating more frequently.



During Cross-Team Refinement, the ordered Product Backlog (1 through 9) is mapped out so the Nexus can visualize dependencies. For example, PBI 5 for Team Orange is dependent on Team Red completing PBI 1.



All else being equal, which PBI is most concerning?

(choose the best answer)

  1. PBI 2, because it has the most dependencies.
  2. PBI 1, because it is on the top of the Product Backlog.
  3. PBI 1, because it is the first piece of work with a dependency.
  4. PBI 2, because there is a dependency with a different team on work that occurs within the same Sprint.

Answer(s): D

Explanation:

PBI 2 is the most concerning because it involves a cross-team dependency within the same Sprint, which can create challenges and risks for the integration and delivery of the product increment. According to the Online Nexus Guide1, dependencies should be minimized or eliminated as much as possible, and if they exist, they should be made transparent and resolved as early as possible. Cross- team dependencies within the same Sprint can cause delays, conflicts, rework, and waste, and reduce the quality and value of the product increment 234. The other answers are not correct for the following reasons:

A) PBI 2, because it has the most dependencies. This answer is not accurate because PBI 2 does not have the most dependencies, but only one dependency with PBI 1 from Team Red. PBI 3 has the most dependencies, as it depends on PBI 1, PBI 2, and PBI 4. However, PBI 3 is not as concerning as PBI 2, because its dependencies are not within the same Sprint, but across different Sprints. This means that PBI 3 can be refined and planned in advance, and the teams can coordinate and communicate their work more effectively 5.
B) PBI 1, because it is on the top of the Product Backlog. This answer is not relevant because the position of PBI 1 on the Product Backlog does not indicate its level of concern, but its priority and value. The Product Backlog is ordered by the Product Owner based on various factors, such as business value, risk, complexity, and dependencies. PBI 1 may be on the top of the Product Backlog because it is the most valuable or urgent item, or because it is a prerequisite for other items, but it is not necessarily the most concerning item 6.
C) PBI 1, because it is the first piece of work with a dependency. This answer is not true because PBI 1 is not the first piece of work with a dependency, but the first piece of work that other items depend on. PBI 1 does not have any dependencies itself, but it creates dependencies for PBI 2, PBI 3, and PBI
5. Therefore, PBI 1 is not as concerning as PBI 2, because it does not depend on any other item, and it can be completed independently by Team Red 5.



Scenario A: Nexus Sprint Review with Five Scrum Teams

There are five Scrum Teams working on a product. During the Nexus Sprint Review, the teams present the results of the Sprint. After introductions, each team takes time to present their work for inspection by individually showing the new features they have built. They are not using a shared environment. The stakeholders do not provide much feedback. The event ends and people filter out of the room.
Since teams are not using a shared environment, what is likely? (choose the best two answers)

  1. The Sprint is too short.
  2. The Nexus has not yet reached the integration phase.
  3. There is no single Integrated Increment.
  4. The Nexus Integration Team is lacking or nonexistent.

Answer(s): C,D

Explanation:

According to the Nexus Guide1, the Nexus Sprint Review is an event where the Nexus presents the Done Integrated Increment that was built over the Sprint and collects feedback from the stakeholders. The Integrated Increment is the combined work of all the Scrum Teams in the Nexus that meets the Definition of Done. The Nexus Guide also states that the Nexus Integration Team is a specialized Scrum Team that provides services and guidance to the Scrum Teams in the Nexus to ensure that the Integrated Increment is produced every Sprint. In the scenario, the teams are not using a shared environment, which implies that they are not integrating their work frequently and effectively. This means that there is no single Integrated Increment that can be inspected and adapted by the stakeholders. This also suggests that the Nexus Integration Team is lacking or nonexistent, or that it is not fulfilling its role of facilitating integration and resolving dependencies. Without a Nexus Integration Team and a shared environment, the Nexus cannot deliver a valuable product Increment that meets the Product Goal. The Sprint length and the integration phase are not relevant to the scenario. The Sprint length is determined by the Nexus based on the complexity and uncertainty of the product, and it should be less than a month. The integration phase is not a separate phase in Nexus, but a continuous activity that happens throughout the Sprint. Therefore, A and B are not correct answers.



The Scrum Teams in a Nexus find they have simply too much work each Sprint to do to deliver a valuable and useful Increment.
What could they try to improve their ability to produce an Increment for the next Sprint?

(choose the best answer)

  1. Reduce the amount of work that the teams pull into the Sprint.
  2. Ask the Nexus Integration Team to extend the Sprint to allow more time for integration.
  3. Reduce the number of Scrum Teams to reduce complexity.
  4. Add another Scrum Team to the Nexus to increase capacity.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The best way to improve the ability of the Scrum Teams in a Nexus to produce an Increment for the next Sprint is to reduce the amount of work that the teams pull into the Sprint. This will allow the teams to focus on delivering a high-quality and valuable product Increment that meets the Definition of Done and the Product Goal. Reducing the amount of work also reduces the complexity and dependencies among the teams, which makes integration easier and faster. The other options are not advisable for the following reasons:
Asking the Nexus Integration Team to extend the Sprint to allow more time for integration is not consistent with the Scrum principles and values. The Sprint length should be fixed and consistent throughout the product development, and it should be less than a month. Extending the Sprint would compromise the feedback loop, the transparency, and the adaptability of the Nexus 11.

Reducing the number of Scrum Teams to reduce complexity is not a viable solution, as it would also reduce the capacity and the productivity of the Nexus. The number of Scrum Teams in a Nexus should be based on the size and the scope of the product, and it should not exceed nine teams 11. Reducing the number of teams would also disrupt the existing team dynamics and collaboration. Adding another Scrum Team to the Nexus to increase capacity is not a good idea, as it would increase the complexity and the dependencies among the teams. Adding another team would also require more coordination and communication, which would consume more time and resources. Moreover, adding another team would not necessarily increase the value or the quality of the product Increment 22.



Viewing Page 2 of 9



Share your comments for Scrum SPS exam with other users:

SAM 12/4/2023 12:56:00 AM

explained answers
INDIA


Andy 12/26/2023 9:35:00 PM

plan to take theaws certified developer - associate dva-c02 in the next few weeks
SINGAPORE


siva 5/17/2023 12:32:00 AM

very helpfull
Anonymous


mouna 9/27/2023 8:53:00 AM

good questions
Anonymous


Bhavya 9/12/2023 7:18:00 AM

help to practice csa exam
Anonymous


Malik 9/28/2023 1:09:00 PM

nice tip and well documented
Anonymous


rodrigo 6/22/2023 7:55:00 AM

i need the exam
Anonymous


Dan 6/29/2023 1:53:00 PM

please upload
Anonymous


Ale M 11/22/2023 6:38:00 PM

prepping for fsc exam
AUSTRALIA


ahmad hassan 9/6/2023 3:26:00 AM

pd1 with great experience
Anonymous


Žarko 9/5/2023 3:35:00 AM

@t it seems like azure service bus message quesues could be the best solution
UNITED KINGDOM


Shiji 10/15/2023 1:08:00 PM

helpful to check your understanding.
INDIA


Da Costa 8/27/2023 11:43:00 AM

question 128 the answer should be static not auto
Anonymous


bot 7/26/2023 6:45:00 PM

more comments here
UNITED STATES


Kaleemullah 12/31/2023 1:35:00 AM

great support to appear for exams
Anonymous


Bsmaind 8/20/2023 9:26:00 AM

useful dumps
Anonymous


Blessious Phiri 8/13/2023 8:37:00 AM

making progress
Anonymous


Nabla 9/17/2023 10:20:00 AM

q31 answer should be d i think
FRANCE


vladputin 7/20/2023 5:00:00 AM

is this real?
UNITED STATES


Nick W 9/29/2023 7:32:00 AM

q10: c and f are also true. q11: this is outdated. you no longer need ownership on a pipe to operate it
Anonymous


Naveed 8/28/2023 2:48:00 AM

good questions with simple explanation
UNITED STATES


cert 9/24/2023 4:53:00 PM

admin guide (windows) respond to malicious causality chains. when the cortex xdr agent identifies a remote network connection that attempts to perform malicious activity—such as encrypting endpoint files—the agent can automatically block the ip address to close all existing communication and block new connections from this ip address to the endpoint. when cortex xdrblocks an ip address per endpoint, that address remains blocked throughout all agent profiles and policies, including any host-firewall policy rules. you can view the list of all blocked ip addresses per endpoint from the action center, as well as unblock them to re-enable communication as appropriate. this module is supported with cortex xdr agent 7.3.0 and later. select the action mode to take when the cortex xdr agent detects remote malicious causality chains: enabled (default)—terminate connection and block ip address of the remote connection. disabled—do not block remote ip addresses. to allow specific and known s
Anonymous


Yves 8/29/2023 8:46:00 PM

very inciting
Anonymous


Miguel 10/16/2023 11:18:00 AM

question 5, it seems a instead of d, because: - care plan = case - patient = person account - product = product2;
SPAIN


Byset 9/25/2023 12:49:00 AM

it look like real one
Anonymous


Debabrata Das 8/28/2023 8:42:00 AM

i am taking oracle fcc certification test next two days, pls share question dumps
Anonymous


nITA KALE 8/22/2023 1:57:00 AM

i need dumps
Anonymous


CV 9/9/2023 1:54:00 PM

its time to comptia sec+
GREECE


SkepticReader 8/1/2023 8:51:00 AM

question 35 has an answer for a different question. i believe the answer is "a" because it shut off the firewall. "0" in registry data means that its false (aka off).
UNITED STATES


Nabin 10/16/2023 4:58:00 AM

helpful content
MALAYSIA


Blessious Phiri 8/15/2023 3:19:00 PM

oracle 19c is complex db
Anonymous


Sreenivas 10/24/2023 12:59:00 AM

helpful for practice
Anonymous


Liz 9/11/2022 11:27:00 PM

support team is fast and deeply knowledgeable. i appreciate that a lot.
UNITED STATES


Namrata 7/15/2023 2:22:00 AM

helpful questions
Anonymous