Amazon
Avaya
Cisco
CompTIA
CrowdStrike
EC-Council
EXIN
Fortinet
Google
ISC
ISC2
ITIL
Juniper
Microsoft
NVIDIA
Okta
Palo Alto Networks
Salesforce
All Vendors
  1. Home
  2. CFA
  3. Sustainable-Investing

CFA Sustainable-Investing Exam (page: 19)
CFA Sustainable Investing Certificate(-SIC)
Updated on: 09-Feb-2026

Viewing Page 19 of 102
Sustainable-Investing PDF 802 Questions

Asset owners can reflect ESG considerations through corporate engagement by:

  1. discussing ESG issues with an investee company's board.
  2. working with regulators to design a more stable financial system.
  3. using ESG criteria to identify investment opportunities through a thematic approach.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Asset owners can reflect ESG considerations through corporate engagement by discussing ESG issues with an investee company's board. This direct engagement allows asset owners to influence corporate behavior, encourage better ESG practices, and address specific ESG concerns that may impact long-term value creation. This approach is integral to active ownership and stewardship strategies.



Institutional investors achieve their stewardship and engagement objectives in practice through which of the following?

  1. Engaging directly with companies only
  2. Utilizing proxy voting advisory firms only
  3. Both engaging directly with companies and utilizing proxy voting advisory firms

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Institutional investors achieve their stewardship and engagement objectives by both engaging directly with companies and utilizing proxy voting advisory firms. Direct engagement involves ongoing dialogue with company management and boards to influence corporate practices. Proxy voting advisory firms provide recommendations on voting matters at shareholder meetings, helping investors make informed decisions that align with their ESG priorities.



Which of the following ESG investment approaches is most likely applicable when investing in sovereign debt?

  1. ESG tilting
  2. Collaborative engagement
  3. Active private engagement

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

ESG tilting is an investment approach applicable when investing in sovereign debt. It involves adjusting the weightings of sovereign bonds in a portfolio based on ESG scores, thereby favoring countries with better ESG performance. This method aligns investment decisions with ESG criteria while maintaining diversification and managing risk within sovereign bond portfolios.



Stock exchanges can contribute to the growth of ESG market by:

  1. supporting companies to issue more ESG-oriented bonds.
  2. increasing the disclosure requirements on ESG data by listed companies.
  3. considering ESG factors when voting on behalf of shareholders at companies' annual general meetings.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Stock exchanges can contribute to the growth of the ESG market by increasing the disclosure requirements on ESG data by listed companies. Enhanced disclosure requirements ensure that investors have access to comprehensive and comparable ESG information, which is critical for making informed investment decisions. This promotes transparency and encourages companies to improve their ESG practices.



The Kyoto Protocol established emissions targets that are:

  1. binding on all countries.
  2. voluntary for all countries.
  3. binding only on developed countries.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Kyoto Protocol Emissions Targets:

The Kyoto Protocol is an international treaty that commits its Parties to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, based on the scientific consensus that global warming is occurring and that human-made CO2 emissions are driving it.

1. Binding Targets for Developed Countries: The Kyoto Protocol established legally binding emissions reduction targets specifically for developed countries, known as Annex I countries. These targets required these countries to reduce their collective greenhouse gas emissions by an average of 5.2% below 1990 levels during the first commitment period (2008-2012).

2. Differentiated Responsibilities: The principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities" underpins the Kyoto Protocol. This principle recognizes that developed countries have historically contributed the most to greenhouse gas emissions and thus have a greater responsibility to lead in emissions reduction efforts.

3. Voluntary Participation for Developing Countries: Developing countries, referred to as non-Annex I countries, were not subject to binding emissions reduction targets under the Kyoto Protocol. Their participation in emissions reduction efforts was voluntary, reflecting their lower historical contribution to global emissions and their need for economic development.

Reference from CFA ESG Investing:

Kyoto Protocol Overview: The CFA Institute explains that the Kyoto Protocol's binding targets apply only to developed countries, with the aim of addressing climate change through legally mandated emissions reductions.

Principle of Differentiated Responsibilities: This principle is highlighted in the CFA curriculum as a fundamental aspect of international climate agreements, ensuring that countries' responsibilities are aligned with their contributions to the problem and their capacity to address it.

In conclusion, the Kyoto Protocol established emissions targets that are binding only on developed countries, making option C the verified answer.



In contrast to engagement dialogues, monitoring dialogues most likely involve:

  1. a two-way sharing of perspectives.
  2. discussions intended to understand the company, its stakeholders and performance.
  3. conversations between investors and any level of the investee entity including non-executive directors.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

In responsible investment, engagement dialogues and monitoring dialogues are two distinct approaches used by investors to interact with investee companies regarding ESG issues.

1. Engagement Dialogues: Engagement dialogues are proactive and involve a two-way sharing of perspectives between investors and the investee company. The objective is to influence and improve the company's ESG practices and performance. These dialogues often focus on specific ESG issues and seek to bring about change through constructive feedback and recommendations.

2. Monitoring Dialogues: Monitoring dialogues, on the other hand, are more about gathering information and understanding the company's operations, stakeholders, and overall performance. These dialogues are intended to provide investors with insights into how the company ismanaging ESG risks and opportunities. The focus is on ensuring that the company adheres to its stated ESG policies and commitments.

3. Nature of Monitoring Dialogues: Monitoring dialogues are typically more passive compared to engagement dialogues. They involve discussions that aim to understand the company's approach to ESG matters, its interactions with stakeholders, and its performance metrics. These conversations can occur at any level of the investee entity, including with non-executive directors, but are primarily focused on information gathering rather than influencing change.

Reference from CFA ESG Investing:

Engagement and Monitoring: The CFA Institute outlines the differences between engagement and monitoring dialogues, emphasizing that monitoring is primarily about understanding and assessing the company's ESG performance and stakeholder interactions.

Investor-Company Interactions: Understanding the nature of these interactions helps investors effectively manage their ESG integration strategies and ensures that they are well-informed about the investee company's practices.

In conclusion, monitoring dialogues most likely involve discussions intended to understand the company, its stakeholders, and performance, making option B the verified answer.



The correlation between ESG ratings of issuers by different ESG rating providers is:

  1. lower than the correlation between credit ratings of issuers by different credit rating providers.
  2. the same as the correlation between credit ratings of issuers by different credit rating providers.
  3. higher than the correlation between credit ratings of issuers by different credit rating providers.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The correlation between ESG ratings of issuers by different ESG rating providers tends to be lower compared to the correlation between credit ratings of issuers by different credit rating providers.

1. ESG Ratings Variability: ESG rating providers often use different methodologies, criteria, and weightings to assess companies' ESG performance. This can lead to significant variations in the ratings assigned to the same issuer by different ESG rating providers. Factors such as the choice of indicators, data sources, and the subjective nature of some ESG criteria contribute to these differences.

2. Credit Ratings Consistency: In contrast, credit rating providers like Moody's, S&P, and Fitch use more standardized and widely accepted methodologies to assess credit risk.
While there may still be some variation, the correlation between credit ratings from different providers is generally higher because they follow similar fundamental principles and financial metrics in their assessments.

3. Empirical Studies: Empirical studies have shown that the correlation between ESG ratings from different providers is lower compared to the correlation between credit ratings. This is due to the subjective and evolving nature of ESG criteria versus the more established and quantitative nature of credit risk assessment.

Reference from CFA ESG Investing:

ESG Ratings Methodologies: The CFA Institute discusses the differences in methodologies used by various ESG rating providers and the resulting variability in ratings. Understanding these differences is crucial for investors when interpreting and using ESG ratings.

Credit Rating Consistency: The CFA curriculum highlights the higher consistency and correlation between credit ratings from different providers, which is attributed to the standardized approaches used in credit risk assessment.



Scorecards for ESG analysis are most likely:

  1. applicable to public companies but not private companies.
  2. used when third-party research or scores are not available.
  3. inappropriate for country-level assessments of sovereign bonds.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

ESG Analysis Scorecards:

Scorecards for ESG analysis are tools used by investors to evaluate and compare the ESG performance of companies, particularly when third-party research or scores are not available.

1. Applicability: Scorecards can be used for both public and private companies. They provide a structured framework for assessing ESG factors and can be tailored to the specific context and data availability of the companies being evaluated. Thus, they are not limited to public companies alone.

2. Purpose and Use: Scorecards are particularly useful when third-party ESG research or scores are unavailable. They enable investors to conduct their own ESG assessments based on the criteria and metrics they deem important. This is often the case for smaller companies, private companies, or in markets where ESG data coverage is limited.

3. Country-Level Assessments: Scorecards can also be adapted for country-level assessments of sovereign bonds, although this is less common. They can include criteria relevant to the ESG performance of countries, such as governance quality, environmental policies, and social indicators.

Reference from CFA ESG Investing:

ESG Scorecards: The CFA Institute highlights the use of ESG scorecards as a practical tool for investors to conduct their own assessments when external ESG ratings or research are not available. This enables a more tailored and flexible approach to ESG integration.

Applicability and Flexibility: The CFA curriculum discusses the versatility of scorecards in evaluating both corporate and sovereign issuers, underscoring their utility in various contexts.

In conclusion, scorecards for ESG analysis are most likely used when third-party research or scores are not available, making option B the verified answer.



Viewing Page 19 of 102



Share your comments for CFA Sustainable-Investing exam with other users:

Finn 5/4/2023 10:21:00 PM

i appreciated the mix of multiple-choice and short answer questions. i passed my exam this morning.
IRLAND


AJ 7/13/2023 8:33:00 AM

great to find this website, thanks
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES


Curtis Nakawaki 6/29/2023 9:11:00 PM

examination questions seem to be relevant.
UNITED STATES


Umashankar Sharma 10/22/2023 9:39:00 AM

planning to take psm test
Anonymous


ED SHAW 7/31/2023 10:34:00 AM

please allow to download
UNITED STATES


AD 7/22/2023 11:29:00 AM

please provide dumps
UNITED STATES


Ayyjayy 11/6/2023 7:29:00 AM

is the answer to question 15 correct ? i feel like the answer should be b
BAHRAIN


Blessious Phiri 8/12/2023 11:56:00 AM

its getting more technical
Anonymous


Jeanine J 7/11/2023 3:04:00 PM

i think these questions are what i need.
UNITED STATES


Aderonke 10/23/2023 2:13:00 PM

helpful assessment
UNITED KINGDOM


Tom 1/5/2024 2:32:00 AM

i am confused about the answers to the questions. do you know if the answers are correct?
KOREA REPUBLIC OF


Vinit N. 8/28/2023 2:33:00 AM

hi, please make the dumps available for my upcoming examination.
UNITED STATES


Sanyog Deshpande 9/14/2023 7:05:00 AM

good practice
UNITED STATES


Tyron 9/8/2023 12:12:00 AM

so far it is really informative
Anonymous


beast 7/30/2023 2:22:00 PM

hi i want it please please upload it
Anonymous


Mirex 5/26/2023 3:45:00 AM

am preparing for exam ,just nice questions
Anonymous


exampei 8/7/2023 8:05:00 AM

please upload c_tadm_23 exam
TURKEY


Anonymous 9/12/2023 12:50:00 PM

can we get tdvan4 vantage data engineering pdf?
UNITED STATES


Aish 10/11/2023 5:51:00 AM

want to clear the exam.
INDIA


Smaranika 6/22/2023 8:42:00 AM

could you please upload the dumps of sap c_sac_2302
INDIA


Blessious Phiri 8/15/2023 1:56:00 PM

asm management configuration is about storage
Anonymous


Lewis 7/6/2023 8:49:00 PM

kool thumb up
UNITED STATES


Moreece 5/15/2023 8:44:00 AM

just passed the az-500 exam this last friday. most of the questions in this exam dumps are in the exam. i bought the full version and noticed some of the questions which were answered wrong in the free version are all corrected in the full version. this site is good but i wish the had it in an interactive version like a test engine simulator.
Anonymous


Terry 5/24/2023 4:41:00 PM

i can practice for exam
Anonymous


Emerys 7/29/2023 6:55:00 AM

please i need this exam.
Anonymous


Goni Mala 9/2/2023 12:27:00 PM

i need the dump
Anonymous


Lenny 9/29/2023 11:30:00 AM

i want it bad, even if cs6 maybe retired, i want to learn cs6
HONG KONG


MilfSlayer 12/28/2023 8:32:00 PM

i hate comptia with all my heart with their "choose the best" answer format as an argument could be made on every question. they say "the "comptia way", lmao no this right here boys is the comptia way 100%. take it from someone whos failed this exam twice but can configure an entire complex network that these are the questions that are on the test 100% no questions asked. the pbqs are dead on! nice work
Anonymous


Swati Raj 11/14/2023 6:28:00 AM

very good materials
UNITED STATES


Ko Htet 10/17/2023 1:28:00 AM

thanks for your support.
Anonymous


Philippe 1/22/2023 10:24:00 AM

iam impressed with the quality of these dumps. they questions and answers were easy to understand and the xengine app was very helpful to use.
CANADA


Sam 8/31/2023 10:32:00 AM

not bad but you question database from isaca
MALAYSIA


Brijesh kr 6/29/2023 4:07:00 AM

awesome contents
INDIA


JM 12/19/2023 1:22:00 PM

answer to 134 is casb. while data loss prevention is the goal, in order to implement dlp in cloud applications you need to deploy a casb.
UNITED STATES