CFA CFA-Level-II Exam (page: 20)
CFA Level II Chartered Financial Analyst
Updated on: 24-Mar-2026

Viewing Page 20 of 145

Lauren Jacobs, CFA, is an equity analyst for DF Investments. She is evaluating Iron Parts Inc. Iron Parts is a manufacturer of interior systems and components for automobiles. The company is the world's second largest original equipment auto parts supplier, with a market capitalization of $1.8 billion. Based on Iron Parts's low price-to-book value ratio of 0.9* and low price-to-sales ratio of 0.15x, Jacobs believes the stock could be an interesting investment. However, she wants to review the disclosures found in the company's financial footnotes. In particular, Jacobs is concerned about Iron Parts's defined benefit pension plan. The following information for 2007 and 2008 is provided.



Iron Parts has adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans.
Jacobs wants to fully understand the impact of changing pension assumptions on Iron Parts's balance sheet and income statement. In addition, she would like to compute Iron Parts's economic pension expense.
As of December 31, 2008, the funded status of Iron Parts's pension plan was:

  1. $175 million underfunded.
  2. $240 million underfunded.
  3. $ 183 million overfunded.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Funded status equals fair value of plan assets minus PBO (395 - 635 = -240). (Study Session 6, LOS 22.c,f)



Lauren Jacobs, CFA, is an equity analyst for DF Investments. She is evaluating Iron Parts Inc. Iron Parts is a manufacturer of interior systems and components for automobiles. The company is the world's second largest original equipment auto parts supplier, with a market capitalization of $1.8 billion. Based on Iron Parts's low price-to-book value ratio of 0.9* and low price-to-sales ratio of 0.15x, Jacobs believes the stock could be an interesting investment. However, she wants to review the disclosures found in the company's financial footnotes. In particular, Jacobs is concerned about Iron Parts's defined benefit pension plan. The following information for 2007 and 2008 is provided.



Iron Parts has adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans.
Jacobs wants to fully understand the impact of changing pension assumptions on Iron Parts's balance sheet and income statement. In addition, she would like to compute Iron Parts's economic pension expense.

Which of the following best describes ihe effects of the change in Iron Parts's discount rate for 2008, all else equal?

  1. Service cost decreased and the pension plan appeared more funded.
  2. Pension expense decreased and the PBO increased.
  3. Interest cost increased and retained earnings decreased.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The discount rate increased from 3-5% to 6.0%. An increase in the discount rate will result in lower service cost. Lower service cost will result in a lower PBO. A lower PBO will result in a higher funded status (more funded). Lower service cost will result in lower pension expense and higher retained earnings. The impact on interest cost cannot be determined without more information. (Study Session 6, LOS 22.c)



Lauren Jacobs, CFA, is an equity analyst for DF Investments. She is evaluating Iron Parts Inc. Iron Parts is a manufacturer of interior systems and components for automobiles. The company is the world's second largest original equipment auto parts supplier, with a market capitalization of $1.8 billion. Based on Iron Parts's low price-to-book value ratio of 0.9* and low price-to-sales ratio of 0.15x, Jacobs believes the stock could be an interesting investment. However, she wants to review the disclosures found in the company's financial footnotes. In particular, Jacobs is concerned about Iron Parts's defined benefit pension plan. The following information for 2007 and 2008 is provided.

Iron Parts has adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans.

Jacobs wants to fully understand the impact of changing pension assumptions on Iron Parts's balance sheet and income statement. In addition, she would like to compute Iron Parts's economic pension expense.

How much did Iron Parts contribute to its pension plan during 2008?

  1. $31 million.
  2. $36 million.
  3. $53 million.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

$327 beginning balance plan assets + $37 actual return + contributions - $22 benefits paid = $395 ending balance plan assets. Solving for the contributions we get $53. (Study Session 6, LOS 22.c)



Lauren Jacobs, CFA, is an equity analyst for DF Investments. She is evaluating Iron Parts Inc. Iron Parts is a manufacturer of interior systems and components for automobiles. The company is the world's second largest original equipment auto parts supplier, with a market capitalization of $1.8 billion. Based on Iron Parts's low price-to-book value ratio of 0.9* and low price-to-sales ratio of 0.15x, Jacobs believes the stock could be an interesting investment. However, she wants to review the disclosures found in the company's financial footnotes. In particular, Jacobs is concerned about Iron Parts's defined benefit pension plan. The following information for 2007 and 2008 is provided.


Iron Parts has adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans.
Jacobs wants to fully understand the impact of changing pension assumptions on Iron Parts's balance sheet and income statement. In addition, she would like to compute Iron Parts's economic pension expense.

Which of the following best describes the effect(s) of the change in Iron Part's expected return on the plan assets, all else equal?

  1. Pension expense decreased and the PBO increased.
  2. Retained earnings increased and the pension plan appeared more funded.
  3. Net income increased.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

The higher expected return reduces pension expense. Lower pension expense results in higher net income. Higher net income results in higher retained earnings. Neither the PBO nor the funded status is affected by the expected return on plan assets. (Study Session 6, LOS 22.d)



Lauren Jacobs, CFA, is an equity analyst for DF Investments. She is evaluating Iron Parts Inc. Iron Parts is a manufacturer of interior systems and components for automobiles. The company is the world's second largest original equipment auto parts supplier, with a market capitalization of $1.8 billion. Based on Iron Parts's low price-to-book value ratio of 0.9* and low price-to-sales ratio of 0.15x, Jacobs believes the stock could be an interesting investment. However, she wants to review the disclosures found in the company's financial footnotes. In particular, Jacobs is concerned about Iron Parts's defined benefit pension plan. The following information for 2007 and 2008 is provided.



Iron Parts has adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans.
Jacobs wants to fully understand the impact of changing pension assumptions on Iron Parts's balance sheet and income statement. In addition, she would like to compute Iron Parts's economic pension expense.

If, instead of following U.S. GAAP, Iron Parts followed International Financial Reporting Standards, its pension liability reported on the balance sheet would be:

  1. higher.
  2. lower
  3. the same.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Under IFRS, Iron Parts s pension liability will be lower because the unamortized past service cost of $37 million is eliminated from the funded status. Stated differently, if we subtracted the unamortized past service cost from the PBO, the funded status would be higher by $37 million. (Study Session 6, LOS 22.e)



Viewing Page 20 of 145



Share your comments for CFA CFA-Level-II exam with other users:

ahmad hassan 9/6/2023 3:26:00 AM

pd1 with great experience
Anonymous


Žarko 9/5/2023 3:35:00 AM

@t it seems like azure service bus message quesues could be the best solution
UNITED KINGDOM


Shiji 10/15/2023 1:08:00 PM

helpful to check your understanding.
INDIA


Da Costa 8/27/2023 11:43:00 AM

question 128 the answer should be static not auto
Anonymous


bot 7/26/2023 6:45:00 PM

more comments here
UNITED STATES


Kaleemullah 12/31/2023 1:35:00 AM

great support to appear for exams
Anonymous


Bsmaind 8/20/2023 9:26:00 AM

useful dumps
Anonymous


Blessious Phiri 8/13/2023 8:37:00 AM

making progress
Anonymous


Nabla 9/17/2023 10:20:00 AM

q31 answer should be d i think
FRANCE


vladputin 7/20/2023 5:00:00 AM

is this real?
UNITED STATES


Nick W 9/29/2023 7:32:00 AM

q10: c and f are also true. q11: this is outdated. you no longer need ownership on a pipe to operate it
Anonymous


Naveed 8/28/2023 2:48:00 AM

good questions with simple explanation
UNITED STATES


cert 9/24/2023 4:53:00 PM

admin guide (windows) respond to malicious causality chains. when the cortex xdr agent identifies a remote network connection that attempts to perform malicious activity—such as encrypting endpoint files—the agent can automatically block the ip address to close all existing communication and block new connections from this ip address to the endpoint. when cortex xdrblocks an ip address per endpoint, that address remains blocked throughout all agent profiles and policies, including any host-firewall policy rules. you can view the list of all blocked ip addresses per endpoint from the action center, as well as unblock them to re-enable communication as appropriate. this module is supported with cortex xdr agent 7.3.0 and later. select the action mode to take when the cortex xdr agent detects remote malicious causality chains: enabled (default)—terminate connection and block ip address of the remote connection. disabled—do not block remote ip addresses. to allow specific and known s
Anonymous


Yves 8/29/2023 8:46:00 PM

very inciting
Anonymous


Miguel 10/16/2023 11:18:00 AM

question 5, it seems a instead of d, because: - care plan = case - patient = person account - product = product2;
SPAIN


Byset 9/25/2023 12:49:00 AM

it look like real one
Anonymous


Debabrata Das 8/28/2023 8:42:00 AM

i am taking oracle fcc certification test next two days, pls share question dumps
Anonymous


nITA KALE 8/22/2023 1:57:00 AM

i need dumps
Anonymous


CV 9/9/2023 1:54:00 PM

its time to comptia sec+
GREECE


SkepticReader 8/1/2023 8:51:00 AM

question 35 has an answer for a different question. i believe the answer is "a" because it shut off the firewall. "0" in registry data means that its false (aka off).
UNITED STATES


Nabin 10/16/2023 4:58:00 AM

helpful content
MALAYSIA


Blessious Phiri 8/15/2023 3:19:00 PM

oracle 19c is complex db
Anonymous


Sreenivas 10/24/2023 12:59:00 AM

helpful for practice
Anonymous


Liz 9/11/2022 11:27:00 PM

support team is fast and deeply knowledgeable. i appreciate that a lot.
UNITED STATES


Namrata 7/15/2023 2:22:00 AM

helpful questions
Anonymous


lipsa 11/8/2023 12:54:00 PM

thanks for question
Anonymous


Eli 6/18/2023 11:27:00 PM

the software is provided for free so this is a big change. all other sites are charging for that. also that fucking examtopic site that says free is not free at all. you are hit with a pay-wall.
EUROPEAN UNION


open2exam 10/29/2023 1:14:00 PM

i need exam questions nca 6.5 any help please ?
Anonymous


Gerald 9/11/2023 12:22:00 PM

just took the comptia cybersecurity analyst (cysa+) - wished id seeing this before my exam
UNITED STATES


ryo 9/10/2023 2:27:00 PM

very helpful
MEXICO


Jamshed 6/20/2023 4:32:00 AM

i need this exam
PAKISTAN


Roberto Capra 6/14/2023 12:04:00 PM

nice questions... are these questions the same of the exam?
Anonymous


Synt 5/23/2023 9:33:00 PM

need to view
UNITED STATES


Vey 5/27/2023 12:06:00 AM

highly appreciate for your sharing.
CAMBODIA