CFA® CFA-Level-II Exam (page: 20)
CFA® Level II Chartered Financial Analyst
Updated on: 25-Dec-2025

Viewing Page 20 of 145

Lauren Jacobs, CFA, is an equity analyst for DF Investments. She is evaluating Iron Parts Inc. Iron Parts is a manufacturer of interior systems and components for automobiles. The company is the world's second largest original equipment auto parts supplier, with a market capitalization of $1.8 billion. Based on Iron Parts's low price-to-book value ratio of 0.9* and low price-to-sales ratio of 0.15x, Jacobs believes the stock could be an interesting investment. However, she wants to review the disclosures found in the company's financial footnotes. In particular, Jacobs is concerned about Iron Parts's defined benefit pension plan. The following information for 2007 and 2008 is provided.



Iron Parts has adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans.
Jacobs wants to fully understand the impact of changing pension assumptions on Iron Parts's balance sheet and income statement. In addition, she would like to compute Iron Parts's economic pension expense.
As of December 31, 2008, the funded status of Iron Parts's pension plan was:

  1. $175 million underfunded.
  2. $240 million underfunded.
  3. $ 183 million overfunded.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Funded status equals fair value of plan assets minus PBO (395 - 635 = -240). (Study Session 6, LOS 22.c,f)



Lauren Jacobs, CFA, is an equity analyst for DF Investments. She is evaluating Iron Parts Inc. Iron Parts is a manufacturer of interior systems and components for automobiles. The company is the world's second largest original equipment auto parts supplier, with a market capitalization of $1.8 billion. Based on Iron Parts's low price-to-book value ratio of 0.9* and low price-to-sales ratio of 0.15x, Jacobs believes the stock could be an interesting investment. However, she wants to review the disclosures found in the company's financial footnotes. In particular, Jacobs is concerned about Iron Parts's defined benefit pension plan. The following information for 2007 and 2008 is provided.



Iron Parts has adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans.
Jacobs wants to fully understand the impact of changing pension assumptions on Iron Parts's balance sheet and income statement. In addition, she would like to compute Iron Parts's economic pension expense.

Which of the following best describes ihe effects of the change in Iron Parts's discount rate for 2008, all else equal?

  1. Service cost decreased and the pension plan appeared more funded.
  2. Pension expense decreased and the PBO increased.
  3. Interest cost increased and retained earnings decreased.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

The discount rate increased from 3-5% to 6.0%. An increase in the discount rate will result in lower service cost. Lower service cost will result in a lower PBO. A lower PBO will result in a higher funded status (more funded). Lower service cost will result in lower pension expense and higher retained earnings. The impact on interest cost cannot be determined without more information. (Study Session 6, LOS 22.c)



Lauren Jacobs, CFA, is an equity analyst for DF Investments. She is evaluating Iron Parts Inc. Iron Parts is a manufacturer of interior systems and components for automobiles. The company is the world's second largest original equipment auto parts supplier, with a market capitalization of $1.8 billion. Based on Iron Parts's low price-to-book value ratio of 0.9* and low price-to-sales ratio of 0.15x, Jacobs believes the stock could be an interesting investment. However, she wants to review the disclosures found in the company's financial footnotes. In particular, Jacobs is concerned about Iron Parts's defined benefit pension plan. The following information for 2007 and 2008 is provided.

Iron Parts has adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans.

Jacobs wants to fully understand the impact of changing pension assumptions on Iron Parts's balance sheet and income statement. In addition, she would like to compute Iron Parts's economic pension expense.

How much did Iron Parts contribute to its pension plan during 2008?

  1. $31 million.
  2. $36 million.
  3. $53 million.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

$327 beginning balance plan assets + $37 actual return + contributions - $22 benefits paid = $395 ending balance plan assets. Solving for the contributions we get $53. (Study Session 6, LOS 22.c)



Lauren Jacobs, CFA, is an equity analyst for DF Investments. She is evaluating Iron Parts Inc. Iron Parts is a manufacturer of interior systems and components for automobiles. The company is the world's second largest original equipment auto parts supplier, with a market capitalization of $1.8 billion. Based on Iron Parts's low price-to-book value ratio of 0.9* and low price-to-sales ratio of 0.15x, Jacobs believes the stock could be an interesting investment. However, she wants to review the disclosures found in the company's financial footnotes. In particular, Jacobs is concerned about Iron Parts's defined benefit pension plan. The following information for 2007 and 2008 is provided.


Iron Parts has adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans.
Jacobs wants to fully understand the impact of changing pension assumptions on Iron Parts's balance sheet and income statement. In addition, she would like to compute Iron Parts's economic pension expense.

Which of the following best describes the effect(s) of the change in Iron Part's expected return on the plan assets, all else equal?

  1. Pension expense decreased and the PBO increased.
  2. Retained earnings increased and the pension plan appeared more funded.
  3. Net income increased.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

The higher expected return reduces pension expense. Lower pension expense results in higher net income. Higher net income results in higher retained earnings. Neither the PBO nor the funded status is affected by the expected return on plan assets. (Study Session 6, LOS 22.d)



Lauren Jacobs, CFA, is an equity analyst for DF Investments. She is evaluating Iron Parts Inc. Iron Parts is a manufacturer of interior systems and components for automobiles. The company is the world's second largest original equipment auto parts supplier, with a market capitalization of $1.8 billion. Based on Iron Parts's low price-to-book value ratio of 0.9* and low price-to-sales ratio of 0.15x, Jacobs believes the stock could be an interesting investment. However, she wants to review the disclosures found in the company's financial footnotes. In particular, Jacobs is concerned about Iron Parts's defined benefit pension plan. The following information for 2007 and 2008 is provided.



Iron Parts has adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans.
Jacobs wants to fully understand the impact of changing pension assumptions on Iron Parts's balance sheet and income statement. In addition, she would like to compute Iron Parts's economic pension expense.

If, instead of following U.S. GAAP, Iron Parts followed International Financial Reporting Standards, its pension liability reported on the balance sheet would be:

  1. higher.
  2. lower
  3. the same.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Under IFRS, Iron Parts s pension liability will be lower because the unamortized past service cost of $37 million is eliminated from the funded status. Stated differently, if we subtracted the unamortized past service cost from the PBO, the funded status would be higher by $37 million. (Study Session 6, LOS 22.e)



Viewing Page 20 of 145



Share your comments for CFA® CFA-Level-II exam with other users:

Salesforce consultant 1/2/2024 1:32:00 PM

good questions for practice
FRANCE


Ridima 9/12/2023 4:18:00 AM

need dump and sap notes for c_s4cpr_2308 - sap certified application associate - sap s/4hana cloud, public edition - sourcing and procurement
Anonymous


Tanvi Rajput 10/6/2023 6:50:00 AM

question 11: d i personally feel some answers are wrong.
UNITED KINGDOM


Anil 7/18/2023 9:38:00 AM

nice questions
Anonymous


Chris 8/26/2023 1:10:00 AM

looking for c1000-158: ibm cloud technical advocate v4 questions
Anonymous


sachin 6/27/2023 1:22:00 PM

can you share the pdf
Anonymous


Blessious Phiri 8/13/2023 10:26:00 AM

admin ii is real technical stuff
Anonymous


Luis Manuel 7/13/2023 9:30:00 PM

could you post the link
UNITED STATES


vijendra 8/18/2023 7:54:00 AM

hello send me dumps
Anonymous


Simeneh 7/9/2023 8:46:00 AM

it is very nice
Anonymous


john 11/16/2023 5:13:00 PM

i gave the amazon dva-c02 tests today and passed. very helpful.
Anonymous


Tao 11/20/2023 8:53:00 AM

there is an incorrect word in the problem statement. for example, in question 1, there is the word "speci c". this is "specific. in the other question, there is the word "noti cation". this is "notification. these mistakes make this site difficult for me to use.
Anonymous


patricks 10/24/2023 6:02:00 AM

passed my az-120 certification exam today with 90% marks. studied using the dumps highly recommended to all.
Anonymous


Ananya 9/14/2023 5:17:00 AM

i need it, plz make it available
UNITED STATES


JM 12/19/2023 2:41:00 PM

q47: intrusion prevention system is the correct answer, not patch management. by definition, there are no patches available for a zero-day vulnerability. the way to prevent an attacker from exploiting a zero-day vulnerability is to use an ips.
UNITED STATES


Ronke 8/18/2023 10:39:00 AM

this is simple but tiugh as well
Anonymous


CesarPA 7/12/2023 10:36:00 PM

questão 4, segundo meu compilador local e o site https://www.jdoodle.com/online-java-compiler/, a resposta correta é "c" !
UNITED STATES


Jeya 9/13/2023 7:50:00 AM

its very useful
INDIA


Tracy 10/24/2023 6:28:00 AM

i mastered my skills and aced the comptia 220-1102 exam with a score of 920/1000. i give the credit to for my success.
Anonymous


James 8/17/2023 4:33:00 PM

real questions
UNITED STATES


Aderonke 10/23/2023 1:07:00 PM

very helpful assessments
UNITED KINGDOM


Simmi 8/24/2023 7:25:00 AM

hi there, i would like to get dumps for this exam
AUSTRALIA


johnson 10/24/2023 5:47:00 AM

i studied for the microsoft azure az-204 exam through it has 100% real questions available for practice along with various mock tests. i scored 900/1000.
GERMANY


Manas 9/9/2023 1:48:00 AM

please upload 1z0-1072-23 exam dups
UNITED STATES


SB 9/12/2023 5:15:00 AM

i was hoping if you could please share the pdf as i’m currently preparing to give the exam.
Anonymous


Jagjit 8/26/2023 5:01:00 PM

i am looking for oracle 1z0-116 exam
UNITED STATES


S Mallik 11/27/2023 12:32:00 AM

where we can get the answer to the questions
Anonymous


PiPi Li 12/12/2023 8:32:00 PM

nice questions
NETHERLANDS


Dan 8/10/2023 4:19:00 PM

question 129 is completely wrong.
UNITED STATES


gayathiri 7/6/2023 12:10:00 AM

i need dump
UNITED STATES


Deb 8/15/2023 8:28:00 PM

love the site.
UNITED STATES


Michelle 6/23/2023 4:08:00 AM

can you please upload it back?
Anonymous


Ajay 10/3/2023 12:17:00 PM

could you please re-upload this exam? thanks a lot!
Anonymous


him 9/30/2023 2:38:00 AM

great about shared quiz
Anonymous