CFA CFA-Level-II Exam (page: 14)
CFA Level II Chartered Financial Analyst
Updated on: 09-Feb-2026

Viewing Page 14 of 145

William Jones, CFA, is analyzing the financial performance of two U.S. competitors in connection with a potential investment recommendation of their common stocks. He is particularly concerned about the quality of each company's financial results in 2007-2008 and in developing projections for 2009 and 2010 fiscal years.

Adams Company has been the largest company in the industry but Jefferson Inc. has grown more rapidly in recent years. Adams's net sales in 2004 were 33-1/3% higher than Jefferson but were only 18% above Jefferson in 2008. During 2008, a slowing U.S. economy led to lower domestic revenue growth for both companies. The 10-k reports showed overall sales growth of 6% for Adams in 2008 compared to 7% for 2007 and 9% in 2006. Jefferson's gross sales rose almost 12% in 2008 versus 8% in 2007 and 10% in 2006. In the past three years, Jefferson has expanded its foreign business at a faster pace than Adams. In 2008, Jefferson's growth in overseas business was particularly impressive. According to the company's 10-k report, Jefferson offered a sales incentive to overseas customers. For those customers accepting the special sales discount, Jefferson shipped products to specific warehouses in foreign ports rather than directly to those customers' facilities.

In his initial review of Adams's and Jefferson's financial statements, Jones was concerned about the quality of the growth in Jefferson's sales, considerably higher accounts receivables, and the impact of overall accruals on earnings quality. He noted that Jefferson had instituted an accounting change in 2008. The economic life for new plant and equipment investments was determined to be five years longer than for previous investments. For Adams, he noted that the higher level of inventories at the end of 2008 might be cause for concern in light of a further slowdown expected in the U.S. economy in 2009.

The accompanying table shows financial data for both companies' Form 10-k reports for 2006- 2008 used by Jones for his analysis. To evaluate sales quality, he focused on trends in sales and related expenses for both companies as well as cash collections and receivables comparisons. Inventory trends relative to sales and the number of days' sales outstanding in inventory were determined for both companies. Expense trends were examined for Adams and Jefferson relative to sales growth and accrual ratios on a balance sheet and cash flow basis were developed as overall measures of earnings quality.



Based on the financial results of Adams and Jefferson in 2007 and 2008, the company demonstrating the lower earnings quality would be:

  1. Adams due to lower cash collection measures, possible inventory obsolescence related to higher 2008 inventories despite slowing customer demand, higher expense growth compared to Jefferson, and lower balance sheet and cash flow accrual ratios relative to Jefferson.
  2. Jefferson due to sharply higher accruals ratios and less conservative accounting methods indicated by the change in depreciation policies and the impact of changes in shipment terms on revenue recognition and inventories for the special overseas offer.
  3. Adams due to slower revenue growth, higher expense growth compared to Jefferson, possible inventory obsolescence related to higher 2008 inventories despite slowing customer demand, and lower balance sheet and cash flow based accrual ratios in 2008 compared to Jefferson.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

According to the simple measures of earnings quality, balance sheer and cash flew accruals ratios, Jefferson's earnings quality in 2008 was lower than its 2007 levels and relative to Adams. The more aggressive accounting treatment for the overseas special offer lowered the quality of revenues and may have understated inventories if some oF these customers don't take deliver)' of the shipments. Jefferson also instituted a more liberal policy toward depreciable lives versus Adams, another indicator of lower earnings quality. (Study Session 7, LOS 25.d,f)



In 2001, Continental Supply Company was formed to provide drilling equipment and supplies to contractors and oilfield production companies located throughout the United States. At the end of 2005, Continental Supply created a wholly owned foreign subsidiary, International Oilfield Incorporated, to begin servicing customers located in the North Sea. International Oilfield maintains its financial statements in a currency known as the local currency unit (LCU). Continental Supply follows U.S. GAAP and its presentation currency is the U.S. dollar.
For the years 2005 through 2008, the weighted-average and year-end exchange rates, stated in terms of local currency per U.S. dollar, were as follows:

LCU/SUS 2005 2006 2007 2008
Average 0.90 1.05 1.05 1.25
Year-end 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.50

International Oilfield accounts for its inventory using the lower-of-cost-or-rnarlcet valuation method in conjunction with the first-in, first-out, cost flow assumption. All of the inventory on hand at the beginning of the year was sold during 2008. Inventory remaining at the end of 2008 was acquired evenly throughout the year.

At the beginning of 2006, International Oilfield purchased equipment totaling LCU975 million when the exchange rate was LCU 1.00 to SI. During 2007, equipment with an original cost of LCU 108 million was totally destroyed in a fire. At the end of 2007, International Oilfield received a LCU 92 million insurance settlement for the loss. On June 30, 2008, International Oilfield purchased equipment totaling LCU 225 million when the exchange rate was LCU 1.25 to $1.
For the years 2007 and 2008, Continental Supply reported International Oilfield revenues in its consolidated income statement of S375 million and $450 million, respectively. There were no inter- company transactions. Following are International Oilfield's balance sheets at the end of 2007 and 2008:

LCU in millions 2008 2007
Cash and receivables 120.0 216.0
Inventory 631.3 650.4
Equipment 820.7 693.6
Liabilities (all monetary) 600.0 600.0
Capital stock 350.0 350.0
Retained earnings 622.0 610.0

At the end of 2008, International Oilfield's retained earnings account was equal to $525 million and, to date, no dividends have been paid. All of International Oilfield's capital stock was issued at the end of 2005.

Assuming International Oilfield is a significantly integrated sales division and virtually all operating, investing, and financing decisions are made by Continental Supply, foreign currency gains and losses that arise from the consolidation of International Oilfield should be reported in:

  1. shareholders equity.
  2. operating cash flow.
  3. net income.

Answer(s): C

Explanation:

Assuming International Oilfield is an integrated sales division and Continental Supply makes virtually ail of the decisions, the functional currency is likely the presentation currency.
Thus, the temporal method is used. Under the temporal method, remeasurement gains and losses are reported in the income statement. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.c)



In 2001, Continental Supply Company was formed to provide drilling equipment and supplies to contractors and oilfield production companies located throughout the United States. At the end of 2005, Continental Supply created a wholly owned foreign subsidiary, International Oilfield Incorporated, to begin servicing customers located in the North Sea. International Oilfield maintains its financial statements in a currency known as the local currency unit (LCU). Continental Supply follows U.S. GAAP and its presentation currency is the U.S. dollar.

For the years 2005 through 2008, the weighted-average and year-end exchange rates, stated in terms of local currency per U.S. dollar, were as follows:

LCU/SUS 2005 2006 2007 2008
Average 0.90 1.05 1.05 1.25
Year-end 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.50

International Oilfield accounts for its inventory using the lower-of-cost-or-rnarlcet valuation method in conjunction with the first-in, first-out, cost flow assumption. All of the inventory on hand at the beginning of the year was sold during 2008. Inventory remaining at the end of 2008 was acquired evenly throughout the year.

At the beginning of 2006, International Oilfield purchased equipment totaling LCU975 million when the exchange rate was LCU 1.00 to SI. During 2007, equipment with an original cost of LCU 108 million was totally destroyed in a fire. At the end of 2007, International Oilfield received a LCU 92 million insurance settlement for the loss. On June 30, 2008, International Oilfield purchased equipment totaling LCU 225 million when the exchange rate was LCU 1.25 to $1.

For the years 2007 and 2008, Continental Supply reported International Oilfield revenues in its consolidated income statement of S375 million and $450 million, respectively. There were no inter- company transactions. Following are International Oilfield's balance sheets at the end of 2007 and 2008:

LCU in millions 2008 2007
Cash and receivables 120.0 216.0
Inventory 631.3 650.4
Equipment 820.7 693.6
Liabilities (all monetary) 600.0 600.0
Capital stock 350.0 350.0
Retained earnings 622.0 610.0


At the end of 2008, International Oilfield's retained earnings account was equal to $525 million and, to date, no dividends have been paid. All of International Oilfield's capital stock was issued at the end of 2005.

Assuming that International Oilfield's equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over ten years with no salvage value, calculate the subsidiary's 2008 depreciation expense under the temporal method.

  1. $78-4 million.
  2. $95.7 million.
  3. $104.7 million.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

Temporal method; [(975 million - 108 million) / 10 years = LCU 86.7 million / 1.00 =
$86.7 million] t [(225 million / 10 years) x Vi year = LCU 11.25 million / 1.25 = $9 million] = $95.7 million. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.c)



In 2001, Continental Supply Company was formed to provide drilling equipment and supplies to contractors and oilfield production companies located throughout the United States. At the end of 2005, Continental Supply created a wholly owned foreign subsidiary, International Oilfield Incorporated, to begin servicing customers located in the North Sea. International Oilfield maintains its financial statements in a currency known as the local currency unit (LCU). Continental Supply follows U.S. GAAP and its presentation currency is the U.S. dollar.
For the years 2005 through 2008, the weighted-average and year-end exchange rates, stated in terms of local currency per U.S. dollar, were as follows:

LCU/SUS 2005 2006 2007 2008
Average 0.90 1.05 1.05 1.25
Year- end 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.50

International Oilfield accounts for its inventory using the lower-of-cost-or-rnarlcet valuation method in conjunction with the first-in, first-out, cost flow assumption. All of the inventory on hand at the beginning of the year was sold during 2008. Inventory remaining at the end of 2008 was acquired evenly throughout the year.


At the beginning of 2006, International Oilfield purchased equipment totaling LCU975 million when the exchange rate was LCU 1.00 to SI. During 2007, equipment with an original cost of LCU 108 million was totally destroyed in a fire. At the end of 2007, International Oilfield received a LCU 92 million insurance settlement for the loss. On June 30, 2008, International Oilfield purchased equipment totaling LCU 225 million when the exchange rate was LCU 1.25 to $1.
For the years 2007 and 2008, Continental Supply reported International Oilfield revenues in its consolidated income statement of S375 million and $450 million, respectively. There were no inter- company transactions. Following are International Oilfield's balance sheets at the end of 2007 and 2008:

LCU in millions 2008 2007
Cash and receivables 120.0 216.0
Inventory 631.3 650.4

Equipment 820.7 693.6
Liabilities (all monetary) 600.0 600.0
Capital stock 350.0 350.0
Retained earnings 622.0 610.0

At the end of 2008, International Oilfield's retained earnings account was equal to $525 million and, to date, no dividends have been paid. All of International Oilfield's capital stock was issued at the end of 2005.

Compute the cumulative translation adjustment reported on Continental Supply's consolidated balance sheet at the end of 2008 assuming International Oilfield is a relatively self-contained and independent, operation of Continental Supply.

  1. -$227 million.
  2. -$200 million.
  3. $298 million.

Answer(s): A

Explanation:

Under the all-current method, gains and losses that occur as a result of the translation process do not show up on the income statement but are instead accumulated in a balance sheet account called the cumulative translation adjustment account (CTA). The translation gain or loss in each year is calculated and added to the account, acting like a running total of translation gains and losses. The CTA is simply an equity account on the balance sheet. To compute the CTA for Continental's balance sheet, force the accounting equation (A = L + E) to balance with the CTA; [(120 million cash and receivables + 631.3 million inventory + 820.7 million equipment - 600 million liabilities) / 1.50] - $350 million capital stock - $525 retained earnings = -$227 million. The LCU 350 capital stock was issued at the end of 2005 at an exchange rate of LCU 1 = $1. The
$525 retained earnings figure was given in the itxt. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.c)



In 2001, Continental Supply Company was formed to provide drilling equipment and supplies to contractors and oilfield production companies located throughout the United States. At the end of 2005, Continental Supply created a wholly owned foreign subsidiary, International Oilfield Incorporated, to begin servicing customers located in the North Sea. International Oilfield maintains its financial statements in a currency known as the local currency unit (LCU). Continental Supply follows U.S. GAAP and its presentation currency is the U.S. dollar.

For the years 2005 through 2008, the weighted-average and year-end exchange rates, stated in terms of local currency per U.S. dollar, were as follows:

LCU/SUS 2005 2006 2007 2008
Average 0.90 1.05 1.05 1.25
Year- end 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.50

International Oilfield accounts for its inventory using the lower-of-cost-or-rnarlcet valuation method in conjunction with the first-in, first-out, cost flow assumption. All of the inventory on hand at the beginning of the year was sold during 2008. Inventory remaining at the end of 2008 was acquired evenly throughout the year.

At the beginning of 2006, International Oilfield purchased equipment totaling LCU975 million when the exchange rate was LCU 1.00 to SI. During 2007, equipment with an original cost of LCU 108 million was totally destroyed in a fire. At the end of 2007, International Oilfield received a LCU 92 million insurance settlement for the loss. On June 30, 2008, International Oilfield purchased equipment totaling LCU 225 million when the exchange rate was LCU 1.25 to $1.

For the years 2007 and 2008, Continental Supply reported International Oilfield revenues in its consolidated income statement of S375 million and $450 million, respectively. There were no inter- company transactions. Following are International Oilfield's balance sheets at the end of 2007 and 2008:

LCU in millions 2008 2007
Cash and receivables 120.0 216.0
Inventory 631.3 650.4
Equipment 820.7 693.6
Liabilities (all monetary) 600.0 600.0
Capital stock 350.0 350.0
Retained earnings 622.0 610.0

At the end of 2008, International Oilfield's retained earnings account was equal to $525 million and, to date, no dividends have been paid. All of International Oilfield's capital stock was issued at the end of 2005.

As compared to the temporal method, which of the following best describes the impact of the all- current method on International Oilfield's gross profit margin percentage for 2008 when stated in U.S. dollars? The gross profit margin would be:

  1. lower.
  2. higher.
  3. the same.

Answer(s): B

Explanation:

As compared to the temporal method, the all-current method will result in a higher gross profit margin percentage (higher numerator) when the local currency is depreciating as is the case in this scenario (the exchange rate has risen from LCU 1 per $1 to LCU 1.25 per $1; thus, it costs more LCUs to buy $1 which is the result of a depreciating LCU). Under the temporal method, COGS is remeasured at the historic rate; thus, COGS is not impacted by the depreciating currency.

Under the all-current method, COGS is translated at the average rate; thus, COGS is lower because of the depreciating currency. Lower COGS results in a higher gross profit margin percentage. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.d)



Viewing Page 14 of 145



Share your comments for CFA CFA-Level-II exam with other users:

Finn 5/4/2023 10:21:00 PM

i appreciated the mix of multiple-choice and short answer questions. i passed my exam this morning.
IRLAND


AJ 7/13/2023 8:33:00 AM

great to find this website, thanks
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES


Curtis Nakawaki 6/29/2023 9:11:00 PM

examination questions seem to be relevant.
UNITED STATES


Umashankar Sharma 10/22/2023 9:39:00 AM

planning to take psm test
Anonymous


ED SHAW 7/31/2023 10:34:00 AM

please allow to download
UNITED STATES


AD 7/22/2023 11:29:00 AM

please provide dumps
UNITED STATES


Ayyjayy 11/6/2023 7:29:00 AM

is the answer to question 15 correct ? i feel like the answer should be b
BAHRAIN


Blessious Phiri 8/12/2023 11:56:00 AM

its getting more technical
Anonymous


Jeanine J 7/11/2023 3:04:00 PM

i think these questions are what i need.
UNITED STATES


Aderonke 10/23/2023 2:13:00 PM

helpful assessment
UNITED KINGDOM


Tom 1/5/2024 2:32:00 AM

i am confused about the answers to the questions. do you know if the answers are correct?
KOREA REPUBLIC OF


Vinit N. 8/28/2023 2:33:00 AM

hi, please make the dumps available for my upcoming examination.
UNITED STATES


Sanyog Deshpande 9/14/2023 7:05:00 AM

good practice
UNITED STATES


Tyron 9/8/2023 12:12:00 AM

so far it is really informative
Anonymous


beast 7/30/2023 2:22:00 PM

hi i want it please please upload it
Anonymous


Mirex 5/26/2023 3:45:00 AM

am preparing for exam ,just nice questions
Anonymous


exampei 8/7/2023 8:05:00 AM

please upload c_tadm_23 exam
TURKEY


Anonymous 9/12/2023 12:50:00 PM

can we get tdvan4 vantage data engineering pdf?
UNITED STATES


Aish 10/11/2023 5:51:00 AM

want to clear the exam.
INDIA


Smaranika 6/22/2023 8:42:00 AM

could you please upload the dumps of sap c_sac_2302
INDIA


Blessious Phiri 8/15/2023 1:56:00 PM

asm management configuration is about storage
Anonymous


Lewis 7/6/2023 8:49:00 PM

kool thumb up
UNITED STATES


Moreece 5/15/2023 8:44:00 AM

just passed the az-500 exam this last friday. most of the questions in this exam dumps are in the exam. i bought the full version and noticed some of the questions which were answered wrong in the free version are all corrected in the full version. this site is good but i wish the had it in an interactive version like a test engine simulator.
Anonymous


Terry 5/24/2023 4:41:00 PM

i can practice for exam
Anonymous


Emerys 7/29/2023 6:55:00 AM

please i need this exam.
Anonymous


Goni Mala 9/2/2023 12:27:00 PM

i need the dump
Anonymous


Lenny 9/29/2023 11:30:00 AM

i want it bad, even if cs6 maybe retired, i want to learn cs6
HONG KONG


MilfSlayer 12/28/2023 8:32:00 PM

i hate comptia with all my heart with their "choose the best" answer format as an argument could be made on every question. they say "the "comptia way", lmao no this right here boys is the comptia way 100%. take it from someone whos failed this exam twice but can configure an entire complex network that these are the questions that are on the test 100% no questions asked. the pbqs are dead on! nice work
Anonymous


Swati Raj 11/14/2023 6:28:00 AM

very good materials
UNITED STATES


Ko Htet 10/17/2023 1:28:00 AM

thanks for your support.
Anonymous


Philippe 1/22/2023 10:24:00 AM

iam impressed with the quality of these dumps. they questions and answers were easy to understand and the xengine app was very helpful to use.
CANADA


Sam 8/31/2023 10:32:00 AM

not bad but you question database from isaca
MALAYSIA


Brijesh kr 6/29/2023 4:07:00 AM

awesome contents
INDIA


JM 12/19/2023 1:22:00 PM

answer to 134 is casb. while data loss prevention is the goal, in order to implement dlp in cloud applications you need to deploy a casb.
UNITED STATES